Opposition parties doubt judicial commission into Saps debacle will lead to accountability
Opposition parties have expressed scepticism following President Cyril Ramaphosa's announcement of a new judicial commission of inquiry, expressing concerns about whether it will lead to accountability and prosecutions.
Last week, KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner Lieutenant-General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi made allegations of corruption, political interference, and malfeasance, specifically accusing Police Minister Senzo Mchunu of unilaterally disbanding the Political Killings Task Team and redirecting 121 active investigation dockets to the office of National Deputy Commissioner Lieutenant General Shadrack Sibiya, where they have allegedly been neutralised.
In response, Ramaphosa on Sunday announced the establishment of the commission to investigate the allegations and he placed Mchunu on a leave of absence with immediate effect, appointing Professor Firoz Cachalia as acting Minister of Police.
Oppositions parties including ActionSA, Inkatha Freedom Party (IFP), Democratic Alliance (DA), Economic Freedom Fighters and the uMkhonto weSizwe Party have been calling for Mchunu's removal from Cabinet since Mkhwanazi publicly made his claims.
Ramaphosa announced that the inquiry will be chaired by acting Deputy Chief Justice Mbuyiseli Madlanga, and will be assisted by Advocate Sesi Baloyi and Advocate Sandile Khumalo.
He said the Commission would have the power to refer matters for immediate criminal investigation and urgent decisions on prosecution.
ACCOUNTABILITY AND TRANSPARENCY
GOOD Party secretary-general Brett Herron said the appointment of a commission was not good enough, calling on Ramaphosa to empower the Special Investigating Unit (SIU) to conduct a "swift, independent" probe under the Prevention and Combating of Corrupt Activities Act.
Herron explained that the SIU has the legal mandate, investigative muscle, and track record to pursue complex corruption matters involving public officials.
"The appointment of a commission, while well-intentioned, is too slow, too cumbersome, and too costly. We have walked this road before, most notably with the Zondo Commission and we have seen that a commission of inquiry cannot replace a criminal investigation," he said.
He noted that the judicial commission could not suspend, charge, or arrest anyone. It could only make recommendations.
"…and until it does, those implicated remain in place, leaving the system vulnerable and trust further diminished. Only Minister Senzo Mchunu has been placed on special leave, likely earning a ministerial salary for sitting at home," Herron said.
DA leader John Steenhuisen said his party welcomed the announcement of Mchunu's leave of absence.
"These allegations provided the President with an opportunity to show bold and firm leadership. Instead, he has once again outsourced executive responsibility to a commission, and South Africans have grown cynical of talk shops, task teams and commissions which they see as buying time and avoiding accountability," he said.
Steenhuisen warned that his party would not accept a years-long process that gathered damning evidence only to deliver zero accountability.
"The country cannot afford another elaborate filing cabinet of findings that gather dust while the politically connected escape justice," he said.
He promised that the DA would hold Ramaphosa to account on all findings and recommendations made by the committee, and that it would fight in Cabinet and Parliament for swift and visible action.
He said Parliament must not be sidelined and that the work of Parliament to hold the executive to account must continue unabated and undeterred.
IFP national spokesperson Mkhuleko Hlengwa called on the commission to act with urgency and transparency, and for all implicated parties to fully cooperate.
He said the allegations of criminality, corruption, collusion and interference within the Saps were deeply alarming and warranted a respo...