
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
This segment discusses the author's "Language Insufficiency Hypothesis" manuscript, focusing on how vague language, particularly in legal contexts, masks power dynamics. The author argues that terms like "reasonableness" are strategically ambiguous, allowing institutions to maintain control. This manipulation of language, the post contends, is a key feature of professional discourse, obscuring the exercise of power behind a facade of objectivity. The author uses Foucault's concept of power relations to frame their analysis and suggests that this intentional vagueness is prevalent across many professional fields. Ultimately, the post advocates for a more critical understanding of how language shapes social reality and power structures.
This segment discusses the author's "Language Insufficiency Hypothesis" manuscript, focusing on how vague language, particularly in legal contexts, masks power dynamics. The author argues that terms like "reasonableness" are strategically ambiguous, allowing institutions to maintain control. This manipulation of language, the post contends, is a key feature of professional discourse, obscuring the exercise of power behind a facade of objectivity. The author uses Foucault's concept of power relations to frame their analysis and suggests that this intentional vagueness is prevalent across many professional fields. Ultimately, the post advocates for a more critical understanding of how language shapes social reality and power structures.