In Episode 27, we established that the unborn is biologically human and alive.
But that still leaves another question:
Does being biologically human and alive make the unborn a person with the same basic right to life as you and me?
In Episode 28 of Practical Apologetics, we look at the philosophical question of personhood.
Using Scott Klusendorf’s SLED argument, we examine whether size, level of development, environment, or degree of dependency are enough to justify treating one human being as less valuable than another.
We also look at what happens when human value becomes conditional on traits like intelligence, independence, health, usefulness, wantedness, or convenience.
That takes us into some difficult historical and modern examples, including eugenics, Nazi Germany’s Aktion T4 program, and concerns surrounding Canada’s Medical Assistance in Dying system.
The question underneath all of it is simple:
If some human beings get to decide which other human beings count as persons, who draws the line?
Sources:
The Case for Life by Scott Klusendorf
Abortion: A Rational Look at an Emotional Issue by R. C. Sproul
United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, “Euthanasia Program and Aktion T4”
Health Canada, Sixth Annual Report on Medical Assistance in Dying in Canada
Canadian Human Rights Commission, What We Learned: Housing for People with Disabilities
Support Practical Apologetics:
https://ko-fi.com/practicalapologetics
Read more from Practical Apologetics:
https://practicalapologetics.substack.com/