Every time I hear of a new case of cancer or a cancer death it saddens me because I know that it just doesn’t have to happen. Preventing cancer is simple but not easy. In this episode of ‘Living outside the Matrix’ we look at the theory of cancer that the mainstream medical fraternity refuses to acknowledge. It is a theory of cancer that explains all of the available evidence and contradicts none of it.

Professor Thomas Seyfried has developed the ideas of Nobel Prize winner Otto Heinrich Warburg (1883 – 1970) and found the truth that cancer is entirely preventable and manageable. He prefers not to use the word ‘cure’. However, when we examine the evidence and do not allow the dogma of the medical fraternity to obstruct rational thinking, a cure for cancer is exactly what we have by definition! A means of remedial treatment to restore health – permanently.

There is absolutely no need to fear cancer or to die from cancer, or to lose a loved one from cancer. Once we hear this information we must process it and absorb it so that it becomes knowledge. Once we have the knowledge and are prepared to implement it, preventing cancer is almost a certainty.

The Mainstream View

Preventing cancer is the claimed goal of all cancer research, however the views of the mainstream espoused by all of the institutions including Cancer research UK, The cancer research Institute and even the General Medical Council, is entrenched in dogma and  will not see the writing on the wall.

Since the declaration of war on cancer in 1971 billions of dollars and pounds have been spent pursuing a remedy based on an incorrect premise. Namely, that cancer is a genetic disease. It isn’t. The amazing contribution to humanity offered by Professort Seyfried is to collate the disparate evidence known as the ‘Nuclear Transfer Experiments’ into one document and to expose it to the two theories side by side. This was done in a published peer reviewd paper.

This mainstream view, the dogma in the Matrix, holds that it is genetic mutations within the nucleus of a cell that is the cause of cancer. However, this is contradicted by the evidence.

The genetic material of a cell is contained within the nucleus. So if the nucleus of a cancer cell is put into a normal healthy cell it would be expected to develop into a cancerous cell. But it doesnt. Also, if the nucleus of a healthy cell is put into a canerous cell, it continues to be cancerous.This because the problem is in cells mitochondria being compromised in their respiratory capability.

Furthermore, the genetic mutations found in cancer cells have been shown to be downstream effects of the damaged respiratory capability of the cell and its subsequent reliance on fermentation for fuel. The fermentation process produces far more Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) also known as free radicals. According to Professor Seyfried this is what causes the genetic mutations. They are an effect not the cause.

The truth of Cancer as a Metabolic Disease

It may sound bold to claim to have the truth about cancer. However when a theory explains all of the available evidence and contradicts none of it, it is safe to say we have found the truth. The official view does not achieve this and and therefore cannot be rationally considered the truth.

According to Wikipedia “Otto Heinrich Warburg was a German physiologist, medical doctor, and Nobel laureate. He was the sole recipient of the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1931. In total, he was nominated for the award 47 times over the course of his career.” He was the first to propose the theory of cancer as a metabolic disease, and it is his work that Professor Thomas Seyfried has developed and built upon.

Warburg proposed that cancer was caused by damage to the respiration of the cell. This caused the cell to switch to an ancient alterna...