<div>The judgment of McLachlin C.J. and Binnie, LeBel, Deschamps, Fish, Abella, Charron and Rothstein JJ.</div>
<div>A: Introduction – (0:00:19)</div>
<div>2: Section 15 sub 2 – (0:02:21)</div>
<div>a: Has as Its Object – (0:14:24)</div>
<div>b: Amelioration – (0:21:33)</div>
<div>c: Disadvantaged – (0:23:16)</div>
<div>3: Application of Section 15 sub 2 to This Case – (0:24:03)</div>

The judgment of McLachlin C.J. and Binnie, LeBel, Deschamps, Fish, Abella, Charron and Rothstein JJ. A: Introduction – (0:00:19) 2: Section 15 sub 2 – (0:02:21) a: Has as Its Object – (0:14:24) b: Amelioration – (0:21:33) c: Disadvantaged – (0:23:16) 3: Application of Section 15 sub 2 to This Case – (0:24:03)

The judgment of McLachlin C.J. and Binnie, LeBel, Deschamps, Fish, Abella, Charron and Rothstein JJ.
A: Introduction – (0:00:19)
2: Section 15 sub 2 – (0:02:21)
a: Has as Its Object – (0:14:24)
b: Amelioration – (0:21:33)
c: Disadvantaged – (0:23:16)
3: Application of Section 15 sub 2 to This Case – (0:24:03)

Prof. Burningham – November 20 – Kapp, 2008 SCC

We’re transforming legal learning through immersive audio streaming. Find out more about us on our website: dicta.dev

Share Prof. Burningham – November 20 – Kapp, 2008 SCC

Sign up to save your podcasts

Prof. Burningham – November 20 – Kapp, 2008 SCC

Prof. Burningham – November 20 – Kapp, 2008 SCC