The judgment of Abella, Moldaver, Karakatsanis, Wagner and Gascon JJ

One: Overview – (0:00:19)

Two: Background – (0:01:34)

A: The Parties – (0:01:36)

B: TWU’s Proposed Law School – (0:02:55)

C: The LSBC’s Decision Not to Approve TWU’s Proposed Law School – (0:04:03)

Four: Analysis – (0:06:09)

A: Questions on Appeal – (0:06:11)

B: The Scope of the LSBC’s Statutory Mandate – (0:07:00)

1: Whether Freedom of Religion Is Engaged – (0:12:20)

2: Overlapping Charter Protections – (0:15:33)

3: Proportionate Balancing – (0:16:08)

Five: Disposition – (0:25:49)

The dissenting reasons of Côté and Brown JJ – (0:26:04)

One: Introduction – (0:26:10)

J: Proportionality – The Infringement Was Not Proportionate – (0:30:33)

1: The LSBC Approval Decision Does Not Balance the TWU Community’s Section 2 sub a- Rights With a Relevant Statutory Objective – (0:30:37)

2: The LSBC Approval Decision Substantially Interferes With Freedom of Religion – (0:31:35)

3: Approving TWU’s Proposed Law School Is Not Against the LSBC’s Public Interest Mandate – (0:33:45)