*Please note that the introduction to this case incorrectly states that it is R. v. Stinchcombe

The Background Facts – (0:02:16)

The Accident – (0:02:37)

The ASD demand – (0:02:51)

The DRE demand – (0:03:34)

The demand for a sample – (0:04:10)

The pre-trial disclosure – (0:04:46)

The disclosure application – (0:05:11)

The training manual – (0:05:22)

The rolling logs – (0:06:32)

The curriculum vitae – (0:07:06)

The Decision of the Trial Judge – (0:08:20)

The Decision of the Motion Judge – (0:11:42)

The Grounds of Appeal – (0:14:53)

Ground #1: The First Party Disclosure Issue – (0:15:28)

The rolling logs – (0:15:57)

The arguments on appeal – (0:17:18)

The governing principles – (0:23:37)

The disclosure regimes – (0:23:51)

The DRE – (0:28:24)

The admissibility of DRE evidence – (0:29:25)

Section 657.3 of the Criminal Code – (0:32:21)

The principles applied – (0:32:51)

The relevance of the rolling log – (0:35:20)

The applicable disclosure regime – (0:37:26)

Possession or control of the log – (0:38:01)

The log as fruits of the investigation – (0:38:33)

The log as obviously relevant – (0:39:33)