Project Geekology

Send us Fan Mail

Resident Evil (2002) is dumb fun, but does that make it a good Resident Evil movie?

We’re heading back to the early 2000s to revisit Paul W.S. Anderson’s video game adaptation, and we’ve got some thoughts. Between the Umbrella Corporation, the Red Queen, zombie dogs, and that absolutely brutal laser hallway, there’s plenty to talk about. But for a movie based on a franchise known for its characters, puzzles, and survival horror, how much does this one actually get right?

Jen goes in completely blind, bringing some fresh reactions to the zombie chaos, questionable movie logic, and a few moments that are unintentionally hilarious. Meanwhile, we get into what makes this movie such a time capsule of early 2000s action horror and whether being entertaining is enough to make up for straying so far from the games.

So, does Resident Evil deserve its place in video game movie history, or is it just a guilty pleasure with a familiar name slapped on it?

Listen now, then tell us: should video game movies stick to the source material, or is a good movie all that matters?

Twitter handles:
Project Geekology: https://twitter.com/pgeekology
Anthony's Twitter: https://twitter.com/odysseyswow
Dakota's Twitter: https://twitter.com/geekritique_dak

Instagram:
https://instagram.com/projectgeekology?igshid=1v0sits7ipq9y

YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/@projectgeekology

Geekritique (Dakota):
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCBwciIqOoHwIx_uXtYTSEbA

Support the show

Send us Fan Mail

When a movie is this iconic, it’s easy to quote it and never really look at what’s on the screen. We hit play on Ghostbusters (1984) and try to answer a tougher question: does it still work in 2026, or are we just running on nostalgia and a perfect theme song?

We talk through why the original Ghostbusters remains a comfort watch and a legit piece of smart blockbuster craft. The mix of paranormal horror, dry comedy, and fast moving plot still clicks, and the “science” sells itself through confident techno babble, proton packs, containment units, and all. We also get into the practical effects that keep aging well, from the haunted library to Slimer’s quick but lasting impact, and of course the Stay Puft Marshmallow Man turning the finale into a sticky disaster.

Then we bring modern eyes to the characters and the vibe. Peter Venkman reads very differently now, and we unpack what 80s comedies treated as romantic persistence versus what feels like workplace creepiness today. We also debate Winston’s late arrival, the EPA guy as a low key big bad, Rick Moranis as an all time scared pipsqueak, and why Sigourney Weaver brings gravity to everything she touches.

If you love movie rewatch podcasts, 80s comedy, Ghostbusters lore, or film analysis that’s equal parts jokes and critique, this one’s for you. Subscribe, share the episode with a fellow Ghostbusters fan, and leave us a five star review so we know it’s a juicy one.

Twitter handles:
Project Geekology: https://twitter.com/pgeekology
Anthony's Twitter: https://twitter.com/odysseyswow
Dakota's Twitter: https://twitter.com/geekritique_dak

Instagram:
https://instagram.com/projectgeekology?igshid=1v0sits7ipq9y

YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/@projectgeekology

Geekritique (Dakota):
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCBwciIqOoHwIx_uXtYTSEbA

Support the show

Send us Fan Mail

Aang is back, and we’re heading straight into the world of Avatar!

We’re diving into Avatar Aang: The Last Airbender and breaking down the latest adventure in the Avatar universe. From the return of familiar characters and the world of bending to the story, animation, and everything in between, we’re talking about what works, what doesn’t, and whether this new chapter lives up to the legacy of the original series.

Does this movie do Aang and the gang justice, or does it struggle to recapture the magic? Join us as we revisit one of our favorite animated worlds and see where the Avatar franchise goes next.

Yip Yip! Tune in and let us know what you thought of Avatar Aang: The Last Airbender!

Twitter handles:
Project Geekology: https://twitter.com/pgeekology
Anthony's Twitter: https://twitter.com/odysseyswow
Dakota's Twitter: https://twitter.com/geekritique_dak

Instagram:
https://instagram.com/projectgeekology?igshid=1v0sits7ipq9y

YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/@projectgeekology

Geekritique (Dakota):
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCBwciIqOoHwIx_uXtYTSEbA

Support the show

Send us Fan Mail

Marty McFly in the Wild West sounds like a gimmick until you rewatch Back to the Future Part III and realize it’s doing something the trilogy hadn’t tried yet: slowing down. We talk through why that pace shift matters, how the 1885 setting changes the whole vibe, and why Part III might be more satisfying than people give it credit for, even when the villains get a little more camp and the characters feel a bit more like heightened versions of themselves. 

Before we saddle up, we also catch up on real-world nerd life: Anthony’s been deep in Final Fantasy demos and Nintendo news, Dakota’s building an app that maps fictional events to real calendar dates across movies and TV, and Rich is balancing Comic Con costume plans with hype for Insomniac’s Wolverine and some very “dad-brain” thoughts about GTA. It’s a fun lead-in because it connects to the bigger theme: what makes entertainment feel joyful instead of cynical. 

Then we get into the good stuff: the 1955 setup, Doc’s letter, Marty’s jump to 1885, the “gasoline hasn’t been invented” problem, and that iconic push to hit 88 miles per hour. We dig into Clara Clayton, the ravine name change, Hill Valley’s repeating family traits across generations, and the ending that still leaves one big question hanging: where does Doc Brown go next after rolling through town on a time-traveling steam engine? 

If you love movie reviews, the Back to the Future trilogy, 1980s adventure movies, or just want a reason to revisit Part III, queue this up. Subscribe, share the episode with a friend who thinks Part III is the weak one, and leave us a five-star review.

Twitter handles:
Project Geekology: https://twitter.com/pgeekology
Anthony's Twitter: https://twitter.com/odysseyswow
Dakota's Twitter: https://twitter.com/geekritique_dak

Instagram:
https://instagram.com/projectgeekology?igshid=1v0sits7ipq9y

YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/@projectgeekology

Geekritique (Dakota):
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCBwciIqOoHwIx_uXtYTSEbA

Support the show

Send us Fan Mail

Jack Sparrow is back, and this time he owes Davy Jones a very big debt.

We’re diving into Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest and talking about everything that makes this sequel so much fun. Jack Sparrow, Davy Jones, the Kraken, Will Turner, Elizabeth Swann, and plenty of pirate chaos.

We get into the movie’s wild action, creepy creatures, hilarious moments, and some of the choices that make Dead Man’s Chest stand out from the rest of the franchise.

Is it better than The Curse of the Black Pearl? Does Davy Jones steal the movie? And just how terrifying is that Kraken?

Grab your rum and come sail with us as we revisit one of the biggest pirate adventures of the 2000s.

Twitter handles:
Project Geekology: https://twitter.com/pgeekology
Anthony's Twitter: https://twitter.com/odysseyswow
Dakota's Twitter: https://twitter.com/geekritique_dak

Instagram:
https://instagram.com/projectgeekology?igshid=1v0sits7ipq9y

YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/@projectgeekology

Geekritique (Dakota):
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCBwciIqOoHwIx_uXtYTSEbA

Support the show

Send us Fan Mail

Green Lantern (2011) has a reputation that hits before the opening credits, so we did the only fair thing: we rewatched it and talked it out like movie nerds with long memories. Along the way, we detour through real life updates, including a genuinely wild parenting discovery where a single voice command and the right song can calm a crying newborn in minutes, plus a quick run of recent rewatches that reminded us how much style matters when a superhero movie commits to a look.

Then we get into the main event: Hal Jordan, the Green Lantern Corps, and a movie that wanted to launch a bigger DC shared universe years before that idea fully solidified on the DC side. We break down what still works, including the unapologetically comic book scale, the willpower versus fear theme, and the fun of seeing Lantern mythology on screen. We also dig into what holds it back, like the heavy CGI feel, the infamous mask design, and a plot that splits attention across Hector Hammond and Parallax in ways that do not always click together.

We also debate the big question people still argue about: is Ryan Reynolds miscast, or is the writing and tone doing him no favors? And yes, we talk Sinestro, because his “maybe we need stronger tools” angle is uncomfortably convincing for a supposed hero. If you’ve ever wondered whether Green Lantern (2011) is truly terrible or just a victim of timing, hit play, share your take with us, and please subscribe and leave a review.

Twitter handles:
Project Geekology: https://twitter.com/pgeekology
Anthony's Twitter: https://twitter.com/odysseyswow
Dakota's Twitter: https://twitter.com/geekritique_dak

Instagram:
https://instagram.com/projectgeekology?igshid=1v0sits7ipq9y

YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/@projectgeekology

Geekritique (Dakota):
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCBwciIqOoHwIx_uXtYTSEbA

Support the show

Send us Fan Mail

Mortal Kombat (1995) isn’t exactly a “great” movie. But man, is it fun.

We’re going back to the 90s for a full nostalgia-fueled look at the movie that gave us memorable characters, ridiculous fights, and one of the greatest video game movie theme songs ever.

We talk arcade culture, trading fatality codes, Johnny Cage’s ridiculous charisma, Raiden, Shang Tsung, and the things that somehow work way better than they should.

We also get into the practical sets, locations, fight scenes, and why Mortal Kombat still has a charm that some modern blockbusters seem to be missing.

It may not be perfect, but it absolutely knows what it wants to be.

And yes... we’re talking about that theme song.

Listen now, and TEST YOUR MIGHT!

Twitter handles:
Project Geekology: https://twitter.com/pgeekology
Anthony's Twitter: https://twitter.com/odysseyswow
Dakota's Twitter: https://twitter.com/geekritique_dak

Instagram:
https://instagram.com/projectgeekology?igshid=1v0sits7ipq9y

YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/@projectgeekology

Geekritique (Dakota):
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCBwciIqOoHwIx_uXtYTSEbA

Support the show

Send us Fan Mail

Nolan turns one of the oldest adventure stories into a modern IMAX gut punch, and we have a lot of feelings about it. We start with some real life chaos, including newborn sleep shifts, late-night watches, and the odd comfort of slipping back into games like Final Fantasy when your schedule makes no sense. From there, we pivot into The Odyssey, the Homeric epic that basically taught Western storytelling how to build a hero’s journey, and what it means when a filmmaker as confident as Christopher Nolan decides to reshape it.

We get into the adaptation choices that sparked the most debate: the tone shift toward horror, the Cyclops sequence that feels more nightmare than myth, and the Cersei transformation scene that is so disturbing partly because it looks practical and physical. We also talk about translation and accessibility through the lens of Emily Wilson, plus the bigger question of what changes are harmless trims versus changes that rewrite the entire point of the story. Along the way we argue about the missing “Nobody” energy, the way temptation and crew motivation are framed, and how a star-studded cast can either elevate a scene or pull you out of ancient Greece when the actor is too recognizable.

The core of our critique is Odysseus himself. In the original Odyssey, he travels from boastful cunning to humbled survivor, and that arc powers the meaning of homecoming and even the roots of “nostalgia.” When the movie starts him emotionally “finished,” we think the journey risks losing its reason for being, even if the filmmaking is undeniably brilliant. If you care about Greek mythology, Homer, movie adaptations, and how the hero’s journey works when you change one key beam, you will have opinions right along with us.

Subscribe for more deep dives, share this with the friend who loves Nolan or hates book-to-film changes, and leave a review so more listeners can find the show. What is one adaptation change you will never forgive?

Twitter handles:
Project Geekology: https://twitter.com/pgeekology
Anthony's Twitter: https://twitter.com/odysseyswow
Dakota's Twitter: https://twitter.com/geekritique_dak

Instagram:
https://instagram.com/projectgeekology?igshid=1v0sits7ipq9y

YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/@projectgeekology

Geekritique (Dakota):
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCBwciIqOoHwIx_uXtYTSEbA

Support the show

Send us Fan Mail

SPIDER-MAN: BRAND NEW DAY — FULL SPOILER REVIEW

Spider-Man: Brand New Day gives Peter Parker a fresh start—but that doesn't mean things get any easier.

After No Way Home, Peter is alone, forgotten by the people he loves, and fully committed to being Spider-Man. We go FULL SPOILERS on what that new life means and whether Brand New Day really feels like the beginning of a new era for Tom Holland's Spider-Man.

We break down:

THE PUNISHER
Jon Bernthal's Frank Castle gets plenty of screen time, laughs, and unexpected heart. We dig into his strange friendship with Peter and why Frank becomes such an important part of Peter's story.

JEAN GREY
Sadie Sink's big reveal as Jean Grey changes the conversation completely. We break down her role, her powers, and what her arrival means for the MCU's future.

THE CRAZY STUFF
Hulk, Damage Control, The Hand, Scorpion, Peter's organic webbing, and that wild post-credit scene all get put under the microscope.

PETER PARKER'S NEW LIFE
What's really going on with Peter's life after No Way Home? We talk about his missing day job, the Staten Island connection, his relationship with MJ, and the very practical question: how is Peter paying for all of this Spider-Man tech?

Seen the movie? Hit play and join the conversation.

Subscribe, share the episode with a fellow Marvel fan, and leave us a five-star review so more web-slingers can find Project Geekology.

Twitter handles:
Project Geekology: https://twitter.com/pgeekology
Anthony's Twitter: https://twitter.com/odysseyswow
Dakota's Twitter: https://twitter.com/geekritique_dak

Instagram:
https://instagram.com/projectgeekology?igshid=1v0sits7ipq9y

YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/@projectgeekology

Geekritique (Dakota):
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCBwciIqOoHwIx_uXtYTSEbA

Support the show

Send us Fan Mail

Is the new Masters of the Universe the He-Man movie fans have been waiting for?

The 2026 Masters of the Universe movie takes a big swing at bringing He-Man into live action, but does it actually work? We’re breaking down Prince Adam’s journey to Earth, Skeletor’s very particular brand of evil, Alison Brie’s Evil-Lyn, Idris Elba, and the movie’s surprisingly weird sense of humor.

We also get into the bigger questions surrounding the reboot: how much should it change from the original, why the box office may have struggled, and whether moving to Amazon Prime so quickly hurt its chances.

And yes, we’re talking Orko, the final battle, the post-credits scenes, and that She-Ra tease.

So did Masters of the Universe finally get He-Man right, or is Eternia better left in the past? Listen and find out.


Twitter handles:
Project Geekology: https://twitter.com/pgeekology
Anthony's Twitter: https://twitter.com/odysseyswow
Dakota's Twitter: https://twitter.com/geekritique_dak

Instagram:
https://instagram.com/projectgeekology?igshid=1v0sits7ipq9y

YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/@projectgeekology

Geekritique (Dakota):
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCBwciIqOoHwIx_uXtYTSEbA

Support the show