Professors Tess Wilkinson-Ryan and Dave Hoffman discuss the offer, the acceptance, and the battle of the forms in Judge Easterbrook's 1997 Hill vs. Gateway decision.

Professors Tess Wilkinson-Ryan and Dave Hoffman from the University of Pennsylvania discuss the Wisconsin promissory estoppel decision in Hoffman vs. Red Owl.

Professors Tess Wilkinson-Ryan and Dave Hoffman discuss the Peerless interpretation chestnut of Raffles vs. Wichelhaus.

Professors Tess Wilkinson-Ryan and David Hoffman puzzle over the restitutionary remedy in a 1944 excavation case, U.S. for Susi Contracting vs. Zara Contracting.

Professors Tess Wilkinson-Ryan and Dave Hoffman from the University of Pennsylvania Law School discuss an uncle's promise in Hamer vs. Sidway. 

Professors Tess Wilkinson-Ryan and David Hoffman of the University of Pennsylvania Law School discuss illusory promises in De Los Santos vs. Great Western Sugar Co.

Professors Tess Wilkinson-Ryan and Dave Hoffman of the University of Pennsylvania Law School discuss expectation damages in Tongish vs. Thomas.

Professors Tess Wilkinson-Ryan and David Hoffman from the University of Pennsylvania Law School discuss the classic case of Lucy vs. Zehmer.

Professors Tess Wilkinson-Ryan and Dave Hoffman discuss Jacob & Youngs vs. Kent.

Professors Tess Wilkinson-Ryan and David Hoffman of the University of Pennsylvania Law School talk Parol Evidence in Masterson vs. Sine.