In part six, I call for an investigation based on an unreported boundary violation that allegedly happened during the study based on a participant’s report. This boundary violation has been known by members of the Hopkins research team for years, but not only has it not been acknowledged, but the subject has been financially rewarded. I describe how I came to see it was a de facto psychedelic “baptism” of a Christian clergy into the psychedelic worldview of a researcher who has publicly asserted for decades that he wishes to integrate psychedelics into religion. Given what we know about the spiritual motivations driving this psychedelic research, the widely-observed nature of psychedelic hypersuggestibility, and the flagrant disregard for healthy boundaries in the researcher environment, I believe what happened in this study put the autonomy, agency, and dignity of research subjects in serious jeopardy.