Hi Everyone!
Here’s a simple but often overlooked fact:
Each one of us is unique.
We each have a unique history and lifestyle. As runners, we all have unique foot mechanics, unique training and racing histories, and unique running goals for the future.
Why is it then that so many experts in the running world say there’s one approach, or one shoe, that is good for EVERY single person?
That’s just not true.
What is true? Try these two statements:
1. There is NO SINGLE running shoe or approach to running that is perfect for EVERY SINGLE runner on the planet.
2. There IS appropriate foot wear for every single runner on the planet.
When I am scouring the research, or reading a book, or checking out an online journal and find that a professional in the field states that every single person should do “this” or do “that,” it instantly raises a red flag.
For me, given my passion about and on the topic of running, red flags fly frequently regarding pat, undiscriminating recommendations about running shoes.
Use this shoe…or go without shoes…
My problem with this advice comes in when the experts promote the idea that what is good for some runners is good for ALL. At Pursuit Athletic Performance, our mission is to make sure runners get the straight scoop on what is ultimately going to be best for them, as individuals. If you want to say it is my agenda to try and set the record straight on what I believe are MYTHS, then so be it, I accept that freely.
Fast forward…
On September 15th, I read a blog post written by well-known and highly-respected triathlon coach, Ben Greenfield. You can find Ben Greenfield Fitness here. I know Ben, having met him at a USA Triathlon Coaching Conference in Colorado Springs some years ago, and again at the Ironman World Championships in Kona last year. I have a great deal of respect for Ben, and know he speaks to a vast audience.
I was really taken aback, however, when I read the opening sentence to his blog post "Barefoot Running Is Healthy, Ancestral And Good For Your Feet – But Is There Such A Thing As Minimalist Cycling Shoes?" The sentence reads:
As you may have heard, there are a ton of benefits you get when you switch to minimalist running shoes or go barefoot……instead of constantly making your feet weak by protecting them with a bubble of built-up, fancy footwear. But is there a natural, ancestral way of treating your feet when you're riding a bike? Or are cyclists and triathletes doomed?
My first reaction to this statement was quick and simple: He’s flat out wrong here.
Ben then goes on to recommend the potential benefits of a custom made cycling shoe made by a company called Rocket 7. I see that as a contradiction. Isn’t having a bike shoe custom made really having a version of an “orthotic” made for your feet? Yes, in fact, it is.
To me, custom shoes are a far cry from “minimalist cycling.” and it presents a contradiction. On the one hand, Ben is promoting that it is better to go “natural” for running (and cycling as well based upon the title of the post). Yet, he recommends the potential benefits of what, in essence, is a custom made foot-bed for a shoe that is ATTACHED to the bike pedal.
In my opinion, there is nothing remotely “minimalist” about being clipped into a bike pedal with high-end bike shoes, let alone taking it one step further and using a custom made foot bed.
I decided to reply to the post.
In my response, I told Ben that while I enjoy his blog, and very often learn some new things while reading,