I used to wake up excited to do research.
I chased goals. I loved the climb.
I believed in the system.
But years of rejection change you.
You start to see the game for what it is.
If you’re at the right school, with the right team, and the right editor, you can make it work.
If not—you’re on your own.
I’ve been on my own for a long time.
The mentors I had during my PhD—brilliant, supportive, challenging—were a rare gift. I’ve never been able to recreate that environment. And I’ve tried.
Finding competent, motivated people who care more about the work than about status?
Extraordinarily difficult.
So you push on alone. You get rejected again. And again. And again.
Until one day, you stop caring about the game entirely.
That’s where I am now.
I still work. I still produce. But the spark is gone.
And here’s the hard truth—many people in academia feel exactly the same.
The only difference is, we don’t talk about it.
That’s why I’ve been building the R3ciprocity platform.
Not for the few who already “make it” in the system.
But for the rest of us—who want to keep going, but need something better:
More feedback.
More positivity.
Small, steady steps toward papers and grants that can’t be easily rejected.
Because some days, the hardest part isn’t the work—it’s finding a reason to start.