
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Explanations are key in project management.
They state why and how a goal will be reached (and e.g. why not in another way)
Also, people can improve and align on explanations (not on isolated statements in a plan or report that show no direct link with the explanation for succes)
Many projects only contain isolated statements (of actions/ TO DOs/ Status/ ...) with explanatory power: without explaining why those things will lead to result (goal achievement) ... and why not other things.
Discussion on my Linkedin slide: https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6683960594212671488/
Episode about “what is an idea” … or “what is a relevant definition for an idea”.
Classical: an idea is a short, action focused statement. E.g. “let’s go to the gym” … or “let’s make a plan first”.
Ideas should not be isolated single statements. They are more. They should be evolving into broader and broader accounts of “how you want to solve a problem”.
Why?
An explanation grows in a particular way: the good parts are kept, the bad parts are replaced. But the entire thing is and should still be the idea. Or the explanation if you want.
It’s wrong to say: we need 1 idea and then the execution is just brainless automated follow-up. In and during execution you need new ideas and improve them as well … all of this is also part of the entire idea to solve the problem.
Episode on this slide I posted on Linkedin:
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6680377988816617472/?commentUrn=urn%3Ali%3Acomment%3A(activity%3A6680149857430196224%2C6680377879110410240)
Emergence: all phenomena that have complex causality in the way they “appear”
Examples of emergent phenomena in organisations:
The issue: you cannot control for emergence to happen
But what can you do ? … That’s what this episode is about.
Episode about this slide I posted on Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6680084290505592832/
Dealing with the difference between good and bad cultures in organisations, and especially with how good or bad cultures “grow”/ “get created” … (i.e. the drivers)
Governance = answers to the “who should rule/ decide/ do … about what?” question
Why do we consider it as a dogma? It has the potential to solve everything
Why can it never be “the” solution to all problems?
What is missing therefore ?
We all know that criticism doesn’t work when it’s about people.
We know it should be about content, content of people’s ideas.
But then ? How should we provide criticism (or feedback) to content ?
From the publisher's feed