ReadMultiplex.com Podcast.

Got something to say to this podcast? Send a voicemail, and you might hear yourself on the next episode!

A person who needed a photograph adjusted once opened a program, selected tools from a menu, and saved a file. The same person who needed a column of figures totaled once launched a spreadsheet and entered formulas. Both actions delivered the result the person already knew how to describe. The program existed only because the computer required the description to be translated into a sequence of operations it could execute.

The binary was never the work. It was the tax the machine charged for refusing ordinary language.

That translation is no longer required for most work. A model that observes how a closed program behaves, compares the results against published file formats and test cases, and emits equivalent operations in another language can reconstruct the program. In early October 2026 Brandon Thomas of ArtCraft directed Claude Opus 5.5 agents to produce clean-room reimplementations of seven Adobe applications in Rust. The repositories appeared between 30 September and 1 October. PhotoCraft, the Photoshop equivalent, reached roughly 45,000 GitHub stars within ten days; the seven repositories together exceeded 86,000 by 11 October. The majority of commits carry a co-author line for the model. The project states that it studied behavior and public specifications only and did not copy proprietary code.

Read more at: ReadMultiplex.com

Support this work by buying us a coffee: https://ko-fi.com/brianroemmele

Got something to say to this podcast? Send a voicemail, and you might hear yourself on the next episode!

There is a kind of loss that does not announce itself. No fire. No headline. A tape deck stops tracking. A dye disc develops unreadable errors on its innermost tracks. A hard drive spins down in a drawer and never spins up. A photo service changes its terms, and the export path disappears. A cloud account sits dormant, invisible, until an automated policy—not a human decision—deletes it. A university lab migrates servers, and the graduate student's dataset is not on the list.

For most of my working life, I have been in the business of moving records out of that kind of custody. My career began where most preservation work actually begins: not in a vault, but wherever the last working reader still sat. Payphone rooms from the late 1970s onward, where I installed and maintained machines whose only record of a call was a paper tape, a coin box, or a line card that a later owner would throw out. Garage benches. Stacks of media that had already outlived the machine that wrote them. Later, the work moved to hard drives and digital accounts. The rooms changed. The failure did not.

The task was never to admire a format. It was to move a record onto something that could still be read before the window closed.

The digital age does not remember everything. It generates an enormous volume of data, retains a thin slice of it, and then fails, quietly, to keep even that slice. Two numbers have to be kept apart, because they are often collapsed into one slogan.

It is almost a certainty you are and will continue to lose your data: Images, videos, test and everything else, gone.

But there is something you can do..

Read more at: ReadMultiplex.com

Support this work by buying us a coffee: https://ko-fi.com/brianroemmele

Got something to say to this podcast? Send a voicemail, and you might hear yourself on the next episode!

A swarm of AI agents flagged a 27-year-old cousin of Prussian blue as a candidate for next-generation computer memory. Don R. Swanson showed in 1986 how such hidden links form, and how anyone can hunt for them.

The Man Who Read Two Shelves At Once

Imagine a library with two rooms. In the first room sit hundreds of papers explaining that a certain substance thins the blood, calms the platelets and relaxes the blood vessels. In the second room sit hundreds of papers explaining that a certain disease grows worse when the blood is thick, the platelets are sticky and the vessels clamp down. The researchers in each room are diligent, and they publish carefully. They simply never walk down the hall.

In 1986 a professor at the University of Chicago walked down the hall. His name was Don R. Swanson, and the papers he published that year gave a name to what he found in the space between the two rooms: undiscovered public knowledge.

Read more at: ReadMultiplex.com

Support this work by buying us a coffee: https://ko-fi.com/brianroemmele

Got something to say to this podcast? Send a voicemail, and you might hear yourself on the next episode!

You do not build a Grok Bot. You hire one. The difference is the whole article..

A chatbot answers a question and forgets the room. A Grok Bot has a name, a job, a conversation that persists, and a cloud computer with a browser, a filesystem, and a terminal. It can sign into the tools you already use, finish a multi-step piece of work, and come back with a result instead of instructions for you to finish. That is an employee. Treat the setup like a hire, or you will hand a stranger the company card on day one and spend the next month supervising the mess.

This is article is written for someone who has never made a Bot. One boring role. A job description. A trial in text. Three runs. Then a report that lands in the Grok Bot app and in email, where you can file it.

Why this is a hiring manual, not a demo

I did not arrive at that sentence by reading a product page. I arrived at it by staffing a company that has no human employees in the operating line.

The Zero-Human Company started as a garage question I had been carrying since the first machines I trusted with real work: what happens if the org chart is made of agents, the chief executive is a model you can audit, and the human job is to hire, bound, and fire roles rather than to do the roles? The early form was Zero-Human @ Home, a distributed lab in the spirit of SETI@Home and the first Bitcoin miners. Spare machines, a university node, laser-disc and DVD-ROM archives a library had given up on, a human in the loop only to change the disks. In March 2026 that network had sixteen live employees and had already crashed eleven times. Two of those crashes were mine. That was the useful part. A fleet that falls over at sixteen will not survive a thousand, and it will not survive a burst.

That is the experience this article is built on. I am a massive advocate for local, open source AI and continue to urge this as the ultimate destination. however you need fast access to powerful tools to learn and grow. Grok Bot is powerful. Grok Bot, which xAI shipped in August 2026, is the first time a person with no garage AI, no lab and no university node can hire in something close to the same shape: a named employee, a persistent computer, a schedule, an approval gate, a report that files itself. The model is not the hard part. The management is the hard part. I learned that by doing it before there was a marketplace template for it. You do not need a thousand employees to learn it. You need one boring hire, run the way we run the thousand.

Read more at: ReadMultiplex.com

Support this work by buying us a coffee: https://ko-fi.com/brianroemmele

Got something to say to this podcast? Send a voicemail, and you might hear yourself on the next episode!

There is a technology that keeps coming back. It appears in a 1920s laboratory, vanishes under institutional fire, reappears in a 1990 patent, lives for decades in garages and small clinics, and then, in 2026, shows up on a catheter inside a living vein. The latest version is a magnetically driven millirobot whose cilia stir circulating tumor cells out of the bloodstream in real time. The idea behind it is older than most of the people who will read this sentence. For a century, medicine has treated the body as a chemical factory. Drugs in, symptoms out. That model built modern hospitals and saved millions of lives. It also left an entire class of observations on the cutting-room floor: that cells run on voltage, that pathogens have electrical surfaces that can be altered without poisoning the host, that frequency and current can change inflammation, mitosis, and circulating load. Those observations never disappeared. They were simply declared inconvenient.

This article traces that lineage from Royal Raymond Rife through Morris Fishbein’s AMA scams and campaign of ridicule, the 1990 Einstein College HIV-current experiments, Bob Beck’s open-source protocol, Hulda Clark’s zapper, Jerry Tennant’s millivolt measurements, Carolyn McMakin’s frequency pairs, Novocure’s Tumor Treating Fields, histotripsy, and the CiliaVine robot now being discussed alongside William Shatner and his daughter. It is written as history and as a map. It is not a prescription.

I am not a doctor. Anyone considering any of these approaches should read the primary papers, weigh them against conventional care, and consult a licensed professional who actually knows this literature and the patient’s specific case. What follows is the record of a technology that refused to stay buried—and of the people who kept building it anyway.The first time I held a working blood-electrification circuit in my hands I was standing in a cold garage in the early 1990s, soldering iron still warm, following photocopied schematics that had arrived in a plain envelope from Bob Beck himself. The plans were simple: a handful of op-amps, a few resistors, a pair of silver electrodes, and a 9-volt battery. Yet the idea they encoded felt older than the century. It felt like something that had been waiting in the walls of American medicine for decades, repeatedly pushed back into the shadows.

This was just a thread in a tapestry of what we will see was suppressed protocols that impacted three generations. Today we are finally seeing some break in the storm clouds that was falsely casted on this avenue of research and we will show a major breakthrough as announced by William Shatner and Melanie Shatner Gretsch No-time-but-now pod podcast on the work of of Dr. Azra Raza MD, oncologist, researcher, and Columbia Medical professor about what’s next in the fight against cancer.

Read more at: ReadMultiplex.com

Support this work by buying us a coffee: https://ko-fi.com/brianroemmele

Got something to say to this podcast? Send a voicemail, and you might hear yourself on the next episode!

In 1995, Neil Postman published a book with a Janus-faced title. The End of Education meant two things at once: that schooling as we knew it was coming to an end, and that schooling had lost its ends — its purposes, its reasons, its gods. He argued that a school without a transcendent narrative is not a school at all. It is a holding pen with a curriculum. Thirty-one years later, the holding pen has Wi-Fi, and every student carries in their pocket a machine that can do their homework, write their essays, and answer every question on the test — while understanding none of it. Postman did not live to see the smartphone classroom or the chatbot term paper. He died in 2003. But he described, with surgical precision, the spiritual machinery that would make those things not just possible but inevitable. He told us which gods we were worshipping, what they would do to our children, and what we would need to believe instead.

Neil Postman did not write a book about school reform. He wrote a warning about what happens when a civilization forgets why it teaches its young. Thirty-one years later the warning is no longer theoretical. It is the room we are sitting in.

Read more at: ReadMultiplex.com

Support this work by buying us a coffee: https://ko-fi.com/brianroemmele

Got something to say to this podcast? Send a voicemail, and you might hear yourself on the next episode!

For over a decade a small group have planned to become the central authority to “protect you” from AI. It sounds like a bad movie script, but understand that when you read this, all of this is taking place. So let's break down the mechanics of the public script, because once you see the pattern, I swear you cannot unsee it. It's everywhere once you look not with conspiracy but with evidence. Step one. Name an unbounded apocalyptic catastrophe. Step two. Attach a very short, very terrifying countdown clock to it. Step three, demand centralized political permission to build or continue development in that sector. And step four, this is the kicker, when the catastrophe inevitably doesn't arrive on schedule, you don't apologize. You just move the clock and ask for more money. It feels exactly like a doomsday cult. You know, like the people who gather on a mountaintop all wearing Nike sneakers on a Tuesday because the leader said a spaceship is coming to destroy the Earth.

And then Wednesday morning rolls around. The sun comes up, no spaceship. But they don't disband. They don't admit they were wrong. The leader just says, our unified prayers bought us a brief window of time. The spaceship is actually coming next month, but we need stricter rules and larger donations to ensure we survive. This mountaintop analogy perfectly captures the psychological trap here. When a group's identity, and frankly their financial structure, are tied to an impending apocalypse, a failed prediction doesn't result in them re-evaluating their core belief. It results in them doubling down on the urgency.

And this isn't just an AI phenomenon, this lens examines the historical base rates of these exact types of apocalyptic predictions. The clocks that would not pay.And the methodology of how these historical predictions failed is identical to how the current AI doom predictions will fail. We look at the trail of failures that destroyed generations it starts with a massive cultural touchstone from 1968, Paul Ehrlich's book, The Population Bomb. Ehrlich, a biologist, predicted that the battle to feed all of humanity was already over. He said that in the 1970s and 80s, hundreds of millions of people would starve to death regardless of any crash programs embarked upon at that time. And people just accepted this as fact. It was treated as a mathematical, scientific inevitability by the press and policymakers. We drive past the “No Nukes” anti enegery deception that sent the US on to a deeper connection to petrochemical energy. None of this is new, the new mask goes on the same corpse of dead end ideology.

Read more at: ReadMultiplex.com

Support this work by buying us a coffee: https://ko-fi.com/brianroemmele

Got something to say to this podcast? Send a voicemail, and you might hear yourself on the next episode!

Imagine a man who can win almost any war he is handed, and still cannot win the war inside his own name. Imagine a civilization so abundant it no longer needs soldiers of its own, so it borrows other people’s genius for violence and calls the arrangement morality. Imagine a chair that is not furniture. This is the cold thunder Iain M. Banks unleashes in Use of Weapons (https://amzn.to/4wmKNvq), the novel that asks the question The Player of Games only circled: after scarcity is solved, who gets used, and what does the using do to the user?

In Part 7 I walked with Bora Horza Gobuchul through the Idiran war and showed the Culture from the outside, a machine civilization that looked to an old warrior like the end of meaning. In Part 33 I stood with Jernau Morat Gurgeh on Chiark Orbital and watched paradise curdle into boredom until a game became a weapon and a weapon became a soul. Now Banks turns the lens on the hidden hand itself. Special Circumstances. Contact’s shadow. The department that does not play Azad on a public board. It plays people.

Picture the Abundance Interregnum not as a gentle dawn and not even as Gurgeh’s tournament. Picture it as a weapons locker whose door has just come unlocked. AI agents are no longer toys. Humanoid bodies are no longer demos. Local models in garages can already plan, persuade, fabricate, and coordinate. The question is no longer whether we will have power. The question is whether we will become the Culture’s Minds, or whether we will become Zakalwe: brilliant, useful, and secretly broken, running other people’s missions because we cannot face our own.

Elon Musk has said the Culture books are a pretty good prediction of the future he is building. SpaceX drone ships carry Banks names. That future is not only Orbitals and matter printers. It is also Special Circumstances. It is the temptation to treat a person, or an agent, or a swarm, as a tool that happens to talk. Use of Weapons is the book that refuses to let that temptation stay pretty.

Read more at: ReadMultiplex.com

Support this work by buying us a coffee: https://ko-fi.com/brianroemmele

Got something to say to this podcast? Send a voicemail, and you might hear yourself on the next episode!

They Laughed At Me When I Said

They laughed. That is the part I want you to remember first, because the laugh is the sound a dying consensus makes when it still thinks it owns the future.

In 2012 I stood in front of a venture group and said that nanofabrication—true atom-by-atom assembly, not 3D printing, not sintering, not melting plastic into the shape of a wrench—would produce working discoveries before 2030, and that the path to a replicator was no longer science fiction. Their “expert” told the room my entire talk should be disqualified. There were no atomic-layer nanofabricators, he said. There never would be on any timeline a serious investor should care about. A hundred years, if ever.

I have heard that same sentence about useful AI that would pass a Turing Test. I have heard it about the personal computer, about the internet in every home, about a robot that could walk into a room and do useful work. The expert is long gone. I am still here. And Oak Ridge National Laboratory just published the receipt.

What Oak Ridge Actually Did

On September 3, 2026, ORNL announced what researchers at the Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences had already proven in ACS Nano: an artificial intelligence can now see individual molecules on a surface, decide how to move them, and build a working material atom by atom—then keep doing it for more than twenty-five hours without a human hand on the controls.

They built the very first crude nanofabricator .

Read more at: ReadMultiplex.com

Support this work by buying us a coffee: https://ko-fi.com/brianroemmele

Got something to say to this podcast? Send a voicemail, and you might hear yourself on the next episode!

The Same Founder Sold Apple the Face — Then Sold Apple the Unspoken Word

How Aviad Maizels’ second Cupertino exit turns PrimeSense’s light-coding lineage into connectionless intent reading on iOS.

Apple’s purchase of Q AI has been reported as just another AI shopping trip: whispered speech, noisy rooms, a $1.5–$1.6 billion price, Siri that finally works in a subway. That is the public layer. It is not the story. It's a story is a 13-year circle.

In November 2013 Apple confirmed it had bought PrimeSense, the Tel Aviv company whose structured-light sensor had given Microsoft’s original Kinect its depth eye, for about $360 million. Four years later that same optical grammar — near-infrared light coding a face, a camera reading the distortion — shipped as the TrueDepth array behind Face ID. I wrote that arc as it was forming: PrimeSense was never a gaming leftover. It was the first tile in an Israeli sensing stack Apple was assembling for identity, emotion, and Voice First devices that would not need a password.

I talked about this before anyone understood on Quora and my research was syndicated as [Apple’s RealFace Acquisition and What It Really Means.

This is the continued story..

Read more at: ReadMultiplex.com

Support this work by buying us a coffee: https://ko-fi.com/brianroemmele