Before the fireworks faded this year and Rascal (my canine companion) had finally calmed down, I found myself caught in the sparks of something else entirely: a clash of narratives surrounding H.R.1, dubbed by some the “Big Beautiful Bill.” I’d heard plenty of heated rhetoric from Democratic leaders condemning the bill as a blatant handout to the wealthy and fossil fuel interests. But then I read a very different take—this time from a thoughtful Trump-supporting acquaintance who spoke glowingly of the bill’s promise for energy independence and economic revival.

So I did what I often do when something doesn’t sit quite right on either side.

I paused. I got quiet. And I chose to look for myself.

Not through the lens of party loyalty. Not through the red vs. blue tribalism that dominates our national conversation. But through the deeper lens of One Cause—a project I’ve been living, writing, and inviting others into since the last election.

Because the truth is, we don’t just need new policies. We need a new foundation for policymaking itself.

A worldview that doesn’t pit us against each other or against the planet we depend on—but one that recognizes our interdependence and shared future.

And this bill? Whether you love it or hate it, it reveals exactly what happens when we legislate from a dysfunctional and unsustainable worldview.

Let’s unpack that.

What Is the “Big Beautiful Bill” Really About?

H.R.1, officially titled the “Lower Energy Costs Act,” is a sweeping piece of legislation aimed at ramping up fossil fuel extraction, deregulating environmental protections, and accelerating the permitting process for energy development—including oil, gas, and mining.

Its supporters frame it as a bold move toward energy independence and economic prosperity. Its critics argue it’s a catastrophic giveaway to fossil fuel corporations, furthering environmental degradation and inequality. From the surface, it’s a political clash like any other.

But let’s go deeper.

What if the real issue isn’t just the bill’s content—but the worldview beneath it?

The Four Great Untruths at Work

As part of One Cause, I’ve identified what I call the Four Great Untruths—core assumptions that quietly shape much of our modern life, including our political systems. They’re not just wrong. They’re dangerously out of alignment with Indigenous wisdom of the ages, modern science, and the living systems we depend on.

Let’s see how each shows up in H.R.1:

1. We Are Separate from Nature

This untruth justifies treating the Earth as a resource pit rather than a living partner. H.R.1 reinforces this by stripping away environmental safeguards and fast-tracking extraction as if the land were inert, disposable, and unfeeling.

2. More Is Always Better

The bill celebrates growth—especially fossil-fueled economic growth—without acknowledging limits or consequences. It promotes more drilling, more mining, more consumption as if expansion were the same as prosperity.

3. The Earth’s Resources Are Infinite

Nowhere does H.R.1 reckon with planetary boundaries. There’s no mention of climate tipping points, ecological degradation, or the cost to future generations. It’s the legislative equivalent of raiding Earth’s savings account with no plan to repay.

4. Technology Will Save Us

The bill leans heavily on innovation and deregulation, assuming that if we just remove enough “red tape,” market forces and tech will fix what’s broken—without needing to rethink the deeper patterns that created the problem in the first place.

This isn’t to demonize those who support the bill. It’s to shine light on the operating system beneath it.

And to ask: what if we chose a different foundation?

The Four Great Truths: A Compass for Regenerative Governance

Now imagine a bill shaped not by domination, scarcity, and short-term thinking—but by life-affirming truths grounded in ancient wisdom, ecological science, and human dignity.

These are the Four Great Truths we explore in One Cause:

1. Interconnectedness

All life is connected. We flourish together or not at all. Policy grounded in this truth would account for the well-being of watersheds, pollinators, ecosystems, and future generations—not just GDP.

2. Sufficiency

There is enough for everyone when we use wisely and share fairly. Rather than hoarding or extraction, sufficiency prioritizes equity, access, and regenerative design.

3. Reciprocity with Nature

We are part of nature’s web, not outside it. True freedom isn’t the right to exploit, but the opportunity to give back. Policy aligned with this truth would build soil, restore forests, and invest in life-giving systems.

4. Humanity as Stewards, Not Masters

We are not rulers over nature, but caretakers within it. Governance rooted in stewardship sees leadership as service—not domination—and future-proofing as sacred responsibility.

These truths aren’t partisan. They’re planetary.

They’re not “left” or “right.” They’re forward.

And we desperately need politics that reflect them.

So What Are We Legislating For?

Maybe that’s the real question this July 4th: Not just what we’re celebrating—but what we’re voting for. Organizing for. Teaching our children about.

Are we defending a system that’s unraveling the very fabric of life?

Or are we willing to co-create a new foundation—one rooted in truth, not ideology?

I don’t know exactly what that next system looks like. But I know this: it won’t emerge from cynicism or despair. It will emerge from bold honesty, radical responsibility, and fierce love—for Earth, for each other, and for all generations to come.

Mini-Mission: Read with New Eyes

This week, take a few minutes to read one piece of legislation—not from outrage or allegiance, but from curiosity.

Then ask yourself:

* What worldview does this reflect?

* Who or what benefits?

* Who or what is left out?

* How would this be different if we legislated from the Four Great Truths?

Then share your reflections. With a friend. On social media. Or even better, with your local representative.

Share Your Dream for a Regenerative FutureClick to add your vision. Your voice matters.

Let’s turn governance into a conversation worth having.

Final Reflection

This isn’t about red vs. blue. It’s about life vs. collapse. Unity vs. division. Possibility vs. business-as-usual.

It’s time we moved from extractive politics to purposeful politics.

And the shift begins not in Washington—but right here.

In our hearts, our homes, our homesteads, our circles of care.

Because the most radical thing we can do right now is believe that a better system is possible.

And then, brick by brick, truth by truth, build it.

Subscribe for Future Purposeful Politics & One Cause Posts. We’re building a new path—together. Join us.

PS: For the Young (and Young at Heart)As I reflected on all of this, I found myself imagining a future walk through the woods with my grandson, Logan. He’s only four now, but I picture him at ten or twelve, asking, “Grand-Dude, what kind of world are we making?”

That image inspired me to craft a companion piece—a version of this message told with curiosity, playfulness, and muddy boots. One for the kids. One for the classrooms. One for the Eco-Guardians in training.

I’ll be sharing it early next week. I hope you’ll read it aloud with a young one in your life—or maybe with the still-young part of your own heart. Stay tuned.

P.S.S.

David Attenborough’s Ocean: The world’s leading natural historian draws on a lifetime of knowledge to reveal how Earth’s vast, interconnected waterways can be restored.

https://www.hulu.com/movie/ocean-with-david-attenborough-1d8f1a4a-72dc-4532-a0e0-d35daa00d3a7

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit wbradfordswift.substack.com/subscribe