Remsen Bible Fellowship, 07/16/2024
Mark 12:18 And Sadducees came to him, who say that there is no resurrection. And they asked him a question, saying, 19 “Teacher, Moses wrote for us that if a man’s brother dies and leaves a wife, but leaves no child, the man must take the widow and raise up offspring for his brother. 20 There were seven brothers; the first took a wife, and when he died left no offspring. 21 And the second took her, and died, leaving no offspring. And the third likewise. 22 And the seven left no offspring. Last of all the woman also died. 23 In the resurrection, when they rise again, whose wife will she be? For the seven had her as wife.”
24 Jesus said to them, “Is this not the reason you are wrong, because you know neither the Scriptures nor the power of God? 25 For when they rise from the dead, they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like angels in heaven. 26 And as for the dead being raised, have you not read in the book of Moses, in the passage about the bush, how God spoke to him, saying, ‘I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob’? 27 He is not God of the dead, but of the living. You are quite wrong.”
From the third chapter of Mark onward, Jesus was making enemies with the rulers and leaders of the Jewish people. This was due, not to his actions, but to their resentment of what his actions implied. This escalates in chapters 11 & 12 as he clears the temple, and condemns the chief priests, elders, and scribes. When they ask where he received his authority, he told the parable of the tenants against them: he calls them wicked and unfaithful servants. He calls himself the Son of God, the stone rejected by the builders.
We saw in our text last week that two contrary factions--the Pharisees and Herodians--came to Jesus and tried to skewer him on the horns of a dilemma, asking whether or not they ought to pay taxes to Caesar. Rather than caving to their question or quivering in fear, Jesus says, “sure - give Caesar back the coin with his image on it. And while you’re at it, give to God that which has his image.” In other words, he was calling people--and the Jewish leaders, especially--to offer their whole lives to God. Which was a damning indictment, because they of course would have claimed that they already did so. But they weren’t offering it all to God - they were busy lining their pockets and worshiping their desires. They weren’t devoted wholly to the Lord as he requires.
In our text today, we meet another segment of the Jewish leadership: the Sadducees. The Sadducees were a priestly class; however, they did not hold to the entire Old Testament as scripture. The only considered the first five books of the Bible to be inspired, the books of Moses: Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy.
This meant that the Sadducees didn't believe in a whole bunch of things that are taught in the Old Testament pretty clearly: including the doctrine of the resurrection. This is what made them sad, you see [simple way to remember the Sadducees, not believing in the resurrection made them sad, you see]. This failure to believe in the resurrection of the dead stood in sharp contrast with the Pharisees who did believe in the resurrection. This is a contrast and argument which the apostle Paul would exploit at a later time, in Acts chapter 23.
While Matthew mentions the Sadducees on numerous occasions in his gospel account, both Luke and Mark mention them only once: in this particular conflict. Like the Pharisees and Herodians whom Jesus has just silenced, the Sadducees believe they have a question which will put Jesus on the spot and expose him or make him look the fool. As we’ve come to expect, the opponents of Jesus come with questions, but they aren’t the genuine questions of someone seeking the truth. They are the disingenuous questions of a brood of vipers.
Let’s re-read verses 18-23,
Mark 12:18, And Sadducees came to him, who say that there is no resurrection. And they asked him a question, saying, 19 “Teacher, Moses wrote for us that if a man’s brother dies and leaves a wife, but leaves no child, the man must take the widow and raise up offspring for his brother. 20 There were seven brothers; the first took a wife, and when he died left no offspring. 21 And the second took her, and died, leaving no offspring. And the third likewise. 22 And the seven left no offspring. Last of all the woman also died. 23 In the resurrection, when they rise again, whose wife will she be? For the seven had her as wife.”
Listen to how Mark himself sets this up: he's giving you clues so that you know how to read this question. They “say there is no resurrection” - and yet they're about to ask a question about the resurrection. Often when reading the Bible you'll get these hints--in the text, no training needed except to pay attention--“here's how to read what’s about to happen.” So when you read your Bible, read carefully and attentively.
The question itself is centered around the practice of levirate marriages and practices codified in the law of Moses. In Deuteronomy 25:5-10 we find the laws concerning this, but we see the practice in scripture even back into Genesis. It was a common practice in the ancient near east, when a man died and he did not have any children, for his brother to take the widow and father a child in the name of his brother. Normally a man’s children would have inherited all that he had: name, possessions, all of it. And so if he died childless, really the only way to keep the family name from being blotted out was for the brother to father a child in his stead. This seems very foreign and strange to us in the 21st century west, but in a world where women relied on their husbands and then sons for protection and provision this had a real functional purpose and utility. In a society where things were not kind to a woman with no heirs and no property, this provided her with both of those things. It was a form of shelter in the case of tragically losing her spouse.
So the Sadducees take this practice, and they run a hypothetical. And the hypothetical situation is what we read: starting with brother one, and going all the way through brother seven, none of them produce an heir through this woman before they all die (and eventually she does as well). Well, come the resurrection, whose wife is she? Theologians often love hypotheticals, and so do lawyers. Retired Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer was famous for his hypothetical questions. And while sometimes hypothetical questions or situations seem silly or extreme, they truly can be useful in getting to the logic underneath a particular principle or rule or law. They can lay bare an argument by taking it to an extreme. This is a common practice in what is called presuppositional apologetics: you take the arguments of your opponent at face value--don't try to argue with their argument--take what they're saying, and then apply it consistently and see if they actually like where it goes.
The Sadducees think they’re doing this - they’re going to take Jesus’ silly belief in the resurrection, run it through the hypothetical grinder of a woman who is apparently more deadly than the angel of death, and see how he likes his doctrine then. But, like Jesus’ previous opponents, they underestimate the wisdom and genius of Jesus. Jesus says, (loosely translating) “Not so fast, wise guys.”
There are three aspects of Jesus’ response that I want you to notice.
The resurrection is true, trust God with the details.
Look again at verses 24-27,
Mark 12:24, Jesus said to them, “Is this not the reason you are wrong, because you know neither the Scriptures nor the power of God? 25 For when they rise from the dead, they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like angels in heaven. 26 And as for the dead being raised, have you not read in the book of Moses, in the passage about the bush, how God spoke to him, saying, ‘I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob’? 27 He is not God of the dead, but of the living. You are quite wrong.”
The first and most obvious aspect of what Jesus says is that the resurrection is real and true. We see this in his statement on verse 27: God is “not God of the dead, but of the living.” And he refers to these men--men who have died--Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob as living. There is a resurrection. The Sadducees are “quite wrong” to doubt life after death. But they don’t understand the power of God, or the Scriptures. They don’t even understand their truncated five book version of the Scriptures! They think this world and its constraints, its definitions, the visible realities of the way things are right now have to define everything out into eternity. They were modern materialists ahead of their time. But as they play the hypothetical game of resurrection, they say, “well in the resurrection (if it's real) there must be marriage, right?” Wrong, says Jesus.
Jesus’ words here are a stumbling block for some people who love marriage. We love the things that come with marriage--children, companionship, intimate friendship, sex--these are all great gifts of God that are part of a marriage relationship. But Jesus says in the resurrection they're not marrying or giving in marriage. Rather, they are like the angels in heaven. By this he means that our life in eternity will be everlasting, we will not die. And we will have no need for procreation and thus, for no need for sex.
And this will remove the primary function of marriage. In our society we think of marriage first of all in terms of affectionate companionship. But in the Bible, while marriage does have this companionship purpose, it is fundamentally ordered to the fulfillment of humanity’s dominion mandate: “fill the earth and subdue it.” Marriage is ordered toward procreation and the raising of children. This doesn’t mean that’s the only reason for marriage or that childless couples are somehow outside of God’s will (depending upon why they are childless). However, this procreative shape is fundamental to the creational and biblical nature of marriage. True marriage must honor this procreative design in its very shape. This is why anything outside of a one man one woman monogamous union cannot and does not honor God. You need to learn to turn a deaf ear to our culture on this matter, and attune your ear to the word of God, and the plain reality of the world he made.
Marriage has a point. And that point is the having and rearing of children. And in the resurrection this will no longer be relevant. Marriage is something which God designed for this age, in this world.
In the age to come, in the resurrection, there will be no more marrying or giving in marriage when all who are part of the bride of the Lamb, those who have trusted in Christ for salvation, enter into the eternal state with him. Have you trusted Jesus personally for salvation? Have you recognized your sinful state before God, and repented of your wickedness? Have you trusted in Jesus atoning and sacrificial death in your place? Have you trusted in his power to give you the same bodily resurrection the Father gave him after three days in the grave? If not, friend I would urge you to do so now. Now is the time, today is the day of salvation.
And if you have trusted in Jesus for salvation and life, then this resurrection life, one where will be “like the angels in heaven” is what awaits you.
But, you may ask, what about my relationship with my spouse? Is everything we’re building here as we invest in our relationship just going to burn and be meaningless in the end? I don’t think so. Marriage points to the greatest reality in the universe, the everlasting union of Christ and his bride. Paul tells us this in Ephesians 5,
Ephesians 5:31 “Therefore a man shall leave his father and mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh.” 32 This mystery is profound, and I am saying that it refers to Christ and the church.
If you like the way things are now, it’s because God made marriage very good. Even after the fall, it remains one of his greatest blessings to us on earth. Human marriage is a temporary reality--a gloriously temporary reality--meant to point to an even more glorious union that lasts forever between the Son and his bride, the church.
I’ve often thought of the message the theologian and pastor Jonathan Edwards had for his wife as he lay dying, “Give my kindest love to my dear wife, and tell her that the uncommon union, which has so long subsisted between us, has been of such nature, as I trust is spiritual, and therefore will continue forever.” I think he’s on the right track.
Earthly marriage is really important. So important that I intend to devote a whole mini-series of sermons to it in September. But that importance is relative in the light of eternity in the presence of God.
In Jesus’ view, the question wholly missed the point, and assumed the Sadducees had come up with some out-there scenario that God had failed to think of. They didn’t know God’s power. Friends, do you know the power of God? Then, even if you have questions about how all of this eternal life and resurrection stuff works, you can look at what is clearly revealed in the Scriptures and conclude: God is big enough and smart enough to handle the details.
The question of the Sadducees is irrelevant because it is based on their faulty assumption that the resurrection isn’t a real thing, and so they hadn’t really thought through what it would be like. But their mistake was an avoidable one.
The Bible is True, Pay Attention to the Details.
The second aspect of Jesus’ response that I want to examine is how Jesus could know--and how he expected the Sadducees should know!--the reality of the resurrection. Jesus believed in the resurrection because the Bible teaches the reality of resurrection life! And he chastises the Sadducees for not knowing it.
How Jesus answers these men is illuminating. He could have gone to a number of texts that seem to make resurrection explicit, like Daniel 12 or Isaiah 26:
Daniel 12:2, And many of those who sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt.
Isaiah 26:19, Your dead shall live; their bodies shall rise.
You who dwell in the dust, awake and sing for joy!
For your dew is a dew of light,
and the earth will give birth to the dead.
However, instead of quoting these sources, which were not accepted by the Sadducees, he plays on their “home turf”, as it were. He quotes Exodus 3:6,
Exodus 3:6, And he said, “I am the God of your father, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob.” And Moses hid his face, for he was afraid to look at God.
How does Jesus prove the resurrection from this self-identification of the Lord? By the tense of a verb! When God appears to Moses at the burning bush, and Moses is wondering, “what in the world is going on?”, God didn’t say, “I was the God of your father, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob.” Rather, he said, “I am.” He refers to himself in the present tense, as currently being their God, though Jacob had been dead for nearly 400 years. Implication? Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob have not ceased to exist. They are, in some real sense, among the living.
This means that death is not the final answer. The Sadducees were wrapped up in a view of the world that only took into account this world. Friends, we need to care about this world. God has given you real obligations, real work, and offers real joy and satisfaction in the world. But if your view of the world is limited to this fleeting life, then you’re just going to be chasing the wind.
How can you have a right perspective on this life under the sun? By turning to the book. Open up God’s word and pay attention--careful attention!--to what it says.
Where do you look for help? Where do you turn when you are facing a problem at work, or in your marriage, or in parenting, or in dealing with a difficult family member or neighbor? Do you look for self-help books on Amazon? Do you type your problem into a google search, or on youtube, or in Instagram and tiktok reels?
Friends, we have the inspired word of God at our fingertips. We have answers to our most profound questions and problems right in front of us. But it will require an attention to detail and thoughtful engagement that demands far more than what we usually give. We want 30 second clips of this or that influencer to help us through life. God has given us the word - to read, to meditate upon, and to put into practice. One of my favorite passages is Psalm 1,
Psalm 1:1-3, Blessed is the man
who walks not in the counsel of the wicked,
nor stands in the way of sinners,
nor sits in the seat of scoffers;
2 but his delight is in the law of the LORD,
and on his law he meditates day and night.
3 He is like a tree
planted by streams of water
that yields its fruit in its season,
and its leaf does not wither.
In all that he does, he prospers.
Friends, do you look attentively and expectantly to the word of God? Do you chew on the word throughout your day, contemplating how to put his words into practice in your life? Do you rest your hope for the future on airy fairy fleeting feelings, or on the rock solid truth of the word of God? It is inspired, profitable, and life-giving: every last noun, verb, and adjective of it. Jesus could argue for the reality of the resurrection based upon the tense of a verb. If you gave God’s word such meticulous attention, what doubts and questions would be put rest in your heart and mind?
Blind Unbelief is Sure to Err
This brings us to our final point: blind unbelief is sure to err. The Sadducees were not interested in hearing Jesus’ response, they were not interested in receiving the resurrection from the dead that they so desperately needed, They thought they could use their cunning to outmaneuver Jesus and make themselves appear wise. They didn’t believe, and their unbelief was a form of blindness.
Their confidence in their own power, their own intelligence, and their own positions of authority prevented them from humbly bowing to Jesus and receiving his instruction and his gracious rule in their lives. Are you trusting in something or someone other than Jesus? Do you let other voices, or your circumstances, or your pride crowd out the voice of God as revealed through the Scriptures?
Blind unbelief is the best way to describe the Sadducees in Mark 12. I take that term--blind unbelief--from the final verse of my favorite poem, “God Moves in a Mysterious Way” by William Cowper. After discussing in the poem how God moves in ways that often defy our expectations and understanding, Cowper makes clear at the end how necessary it is to prioritize trust in God above our own immediate perceptions, which are faulty, at best.
Blind unbelief is sure to err,
and scan His work in vain;
God is His own interpreter,
and He will make it plain.
May God grant us the eyes--the faith--to look to his word to interpret our circumstances and to answer our questions.
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit remsenbible.substack.com