
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


This is very worthwhile 36 minutes if you’ve ever thought “there’s so much conflicting nutrition information, I don’t know who to believe.”
Nutrition science and research is complicated, but understanding the bigger picture and using it as an anchor can help significantly.
I break down why the single nutrient approach to nutrition research isn’t the vibe and what we need to do to acknowledge synergy and paint a more complete picture. We also talk about what makes a healthy diet “healthy” and what’s most important to consider. We end by talking about the great protein debate and what the evidence really says using a method called Nutritional Geometry to draw equitable conclusions across papers.
I hope you enjoy this episode. If you do, I’d appreciate it if you could take a second to write a review and give the podcast a 5 star rating, or, simply share this episode with a friend. <3
Link to freebies & Programs
By Emily BostinThis is very worthwhile 36 minutes if you’ve ever thought “there’s so much conflicting nutrition information, I don’t know who to believe.”
Nutrition science and research is complicated, but understanding the bigger picture and using it as an anchor can help significantly.
I break down why the single nutrient approach to nutrition research isn’t the vibe and what we need to do to acknowledge synergy and paint a more complete picture. We also talk about what makes a healthy diet “healthy” and what’s most important to consider. We end by talking about the great protein debate and what the evidence really says using a method called Nutritional Geometry to draw equitable conclusions across papers.
I hope you enjoy this episode. If you do, I’d appreciate it if you could take a second to write a review and give the podcast a 5 star rating, or, simply share this episode with a friend. <3
Link to freebies & Programs