The US Supreme Court (SCOTUS) is nothing if not consistently inconsistent.

Unfortunately, in the US there is little in the way of protection from this particular band of nine religiously-dressed, unelected individuals; a fact made all the more clear when they issue two opposed opinions based on almost identical legal premises and arguments.

YouTube should love the number of times we say "vaccine mandates"...in Virtual Legality.

CHECK OUT THE VIDEO AT: https://youtu.be/02nq9kw8u4o

#Vaccines #Mandates #SCOTUS

***

WANT TO SUPPORT THE CHANNEL

PATREON - https://www.patreon.com/VirtualLegality

STREAMLABS - https://streamlabs.com/richardhoeg

STORE - https://teespring.com/stores/hoeg-law-store

***

CHAPTERS

00:00 Introduction

05:01 The OSHA Opinion

18:39 The OSHA Concurrence (Major Questions)

27:43 The OSHA Dissent

32:34 The Healthcare Workers Decision

47:16 Pulling the Purse Strings (South Dakota v Dole)

56:40 The Healthcare Dissent (Major Questions; Notice and Comment)

1:00:29 Conclusion

***

Discussed in this episode:

National Federation of Independent Business v OSHA

SCOTUS - January 13, 2022

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21a244_hgci.pdf

Biden v Missouri

SCOTUS - January 13, 2022

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21a240_d18e.pdf

South Dakota v. Dole

483 U.S. 203 (1987)

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/483/203/

***

"Virtual Legality" is a continuing series discussing the law, video games, software, and everything digital, hosted by Richard Hoeg, of the Hoeg Law Business Law Firm (Hoeg Law).

CHECK OUT THE REST OF VIRTUAL LEGALITY HERE:

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL1zDCgJzZUy9YAU61GoW-00K0TJOGnPCo

DISCUSSION IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS LEGAL ADVICE. INDIVIDUALS INTERESTED IN THE LEGAL TOPICS DISCUSSED IN THIS VIDEO SHOULD CONSULT WITH THEIR OWN COUNSEL.

***

Twitter: @hoeglaw

Web: hoeglaw.com