Leading creation science evidence reveals major problems with Big Bang theory that scientists can't ignore. Discover why inflation theory fails scientific method and alternative cosmologies that fit biblical creation better. Princeton and Harvard physicists expose Big Bang flaws in this Science Conversations episode.

Join Dr. John Ashton and Kaysie Vokurka as they examine the scientific evidence challenging mainstream cosmology. Learn about the 2017 Scientific American paper "Pop Goes the Universe" where top astrophysicists questioned inflation theory's validity.

KEY TOPICS COVERED:
• Why Big Bang theory cannot be falsified
• Alternative cosmology models and evidence
• Fine tuning of the universe pointing to intelligent design
• Scientific community's emotional vs logical arguments
• Biblical creation vs secular scientific theories

This episode is part of our ongoing Science Conversations series examining creation science evidence and biblical worldview perspectives on origins.

Check out our other podcasts:
www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts

Leading astronomers expose fatal problems with Big Bang theory including dark matter, cosmic background radiation issues, and evidence for supernatural creation. Discover why this cosmological model relies on unobserved fudge factors and contradicts astronomical observations.

Key topics covered:
- Dark matter and dark energy as unproven constructs
- New Scientist open letter from top astronomers including Hilton Arp
- Alternative explanations for cosmic microwave background radiation
- Supernova remnant evidence supporting young universe
- Fully formed spiral galaxies contradicting Big Bang predictions
- Planetary magnetic field measurements indicating recent creation

This Science Conversations episode reveals how the Big Bang theory survives only through adjustable parameters while growing astronomical evidence supports biblical creation accounts. Perfect for those interested in creation science, biblical cosmology, and alternative scientific perspectives.

Check out our other podcasts:
www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts

Scientists REJECT Big Bang theory due to impossible mathematical odds! Discover why leading physicists found fatal flaws in this cosmological model. Universe fine-tuning reveals evidence for design.

Join Kaysie Vokurka in Science Conversations as she explores fundamental problems with Big Bang cosmology. From the mysterious "singularity" and fourth-dimensional hyperspace, to Fred Hoyle’s legendary critique, learn why the odds of our universe forming by chance are mathematically impossible.

Key topics include:

Expert analysis breaks down the complex physics and mathematics that challenge naturalistic explanations for the universe’s origin—revealing why the evidence points toward supernatural creation.

Check out our other podcasts:
www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts

Carbon-14 dating controversy: measurable carbon-14 found in dinosaur fossils, coal, and billion-year-old diamonds. Discover why these findings challenge radiometric dating and the evolution timeline.

Unlock the shocking science behind carbon-14 dating! This episode explores how measurable carbon-14 has been found in materials supposedly millions or even billions of years old—like coal, dinosaur fossils, and diamonds. Dr. John Ashton reveals why these results challenge conventional geological timelines and support young earth creation science. Learn about key issues with radiometric dating, including cosmic ray formation, Earth's magnetic field, atmospheric carbon variations, and calibration problems. Plus, real-world dating errors from European artifacts and fossil wood!

Join Kaysie Vokurka for Science Conversations as we dig into the facts, the flaws, and the fascinating evidence that’s rewriting the story of Earth’s age.

Check out our other podcasts: https://studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrnwpXvR9xDYr8WqGvjQ/content/podcasts

How accurate is radiometric dating? Discover shocking problems with radiometric dating methods, wild inconsistencies in rock ages, and why rocks of known age often test as millions or billions of years old. Science Conversations exposes the truth about radiometric dating accuracy with real scientific evidence and critical thinking.

Join host Kaysie Vokurka as she interviews a leading scientist to reveal:
• Why different radiometric dating methods (rubidium-strontium, potassium-argon, lead-lead, samarium-neodymium) produce wildly different ages for the same rock sample.
• Documented cases where rocks of known historical age (like Hawaiian lava flows and Mount St. Helens) are dated as billions of years old.
• How selection bias and “cherry-picking” of results shape the accepted geological timeline.
• Evidence from top institutions (Australian National University, peer-reviewed textbooks) challenging the reliability of radiometric dating.
• The need for a critical reevaluation of dating methods in modern science.

If you’re passionate about science, critical thinking, or want to understand the real evidence behind radiometric dating, this episode is for you. Subscribe for more Science Conversations exploring science, faith, and evidence-based discussion.

Check out our other podcasts:
www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/podcasts

Radiometric dating accuracy questioned as creation scientist exposes carbon dating flaws, geological dating problems, and uniformitarian assumptions. Major scientific evidence challenges millions of years timeline with erosion rates, catastrophic geology, and biblical flood model supporting young earth creation science.

Join Kaysie Vokurka on Science Conversations as we investigate the fundamental problems with radiometric dating. This episode unpacks the circular reasoning, key assumptions, and scientific inconsistencies that challenge the supposed reliability of geological dating. Discover how catastrophic events, erosion rates, and the biblical flood model present a radically different timeline.

Key Topics:
• Radiometric dating assumptions & limitations
• Circular reasoning in geological dating
• Uniformitarian vs catastrophic geology
• Erosion rates vs deep time
• Isochron dating methodology flaws
• Young earth evidence from creation science

Related Content:
• Creation Science Evidence
• Biblical Flood Geology
• Young Earth Scientific Evidence

Check out our other podcasts:
studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts

Groundbreaking DNA research is shattering the evolutionary timeline! In this eye-opening episode of Science Conversations, Dr. John Ashton reveals explosive scientific evidence showing life on Earth simply cannot be millions of years old.

What You’ll Discover:

• DNA’s Time Limit: Human DNA accumulates 90,000 errors in just 6,000 years. By 6 million years, 3% of our genetic code would be damaged—making long-term survival impossible.
• Genetic Decay Accelerates: Over 10,000 genetic diseases now catalogued, and the number keeps rising.
• Soft Tissue Shockers: Collagen, muscle fiber, and DNA fragments found in dinosaur fossils supposedly 70 million years old—biologically impossible!
• Living Bacteria in Ancient Salt: Viable bacteria discovered in “250 million year old” salt crystals—contradicting evolutionary dating.
• Mitochondrial Mayhem: Just 1% of genes control 10% of our DNA’s function, and errors here rapidly lead to organism failure.
• Mutation Rates Confirm Young Life: Dr. John Sanford (Cornell University) calculates a maximum realistic age for life on Earth: 10,000–100,000 years, more closely matching the biblical creation timeline.

Why You Haven’t Heard This in School:

Mainstream science textbooks rarely mention these findings, but top journals like Nature are publishing the data. The evidence is converging on a young Earth, supporting the Bible’s account and challenging the radiometric dating methods taught as fact.

Don’t miss the finale of our radiometric dating series! Subscribe for more faith-affirming, evidence-based science that reveals God’s truth.

Check out our other podcasts:

Browse all playlists here www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists

The evidence is overwhelming: radiometric dating methods simply don’t match up with real-world geological data. In part 2 of this explosive series, Kaysie Vokurka and Dr. John Ashton dig even deeper into the evidence that’s shaking the foundations of evolutionary timelines.
What You’ll Discover in This Episode:

• Why erosion rates prove continents couldn’t possibly survive for billions of years
• Ocean sediment thickness reveals Earth’s true age (not the claimed 2.5 billion years)
• Volcanic evidence that completely upends evolutionary dating
• Where all the missing sediment went—according to biblical flood geology
• How Grand Canyon rocks show impossible preservation over supposed millions of years

Dr. Ashton shares jaw-dropping calculations: at current volcanic output rates (1 cubic mile per year), Earth should be buried under 12 miles of volcanic material if it were truly billions of years old. Instead, measurements show only 34 million years’ worth—a massive discrepancy that mainstream science can’t explain.

The Biblical Flood Model Explains the Evidence:

• Rapid sedimentation during catastrophic global events
• Massive volcanic activity during the “fountains of the deep”
• Mountain uplift explains marine fossils found at high elevations
• Fossil preservation demands rapid, large-scale burial

Key Evidence Highlighted:

• Tambora volcano (1815): 25–70 cubic miles ejected in a single event
• Lake Taupo: 260 cubic miles of material released
• Historical lava flows radiometrically dated at millions of years when actually decades old

This is part 2 of 3 in our radiometric dating investigation. Subscribe for more faith-affirming science content that challenges evolutionary assumptions with real evidence.

Check out our other podcasts:
Browse all playlists here www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists

The age of the earth and radiometric dating. Evolutionary theory depends on assumed long ages of the earth, with fossil bearing strata estimated to be hundreds of millions of years old. Radiometric dating results appear to support and validate these long timeframes. Does all available data converge with this? Other evidence, such as continental and mountain erosion rates, does not align with these long time-periods and instead presents a much younger earth. How does this impact evolutionary assumptions?

Check out our other podcasts:

https://www.youtube.com/@3abnaustraliaradio885/playlists

The great flood of Noah. The book of Genesis records the lifespan of key individuals that lived on earth before the flood. It also accurately records when the flood occurred and the age of key individuals after the flood. While the age of those who lived before the flood averaged 900 years, the ages of those living after the flood dropped dramatically to 100-200 years within a few generations. How realistic are these lifespan records? Is there any evidence that supports these ages, along with a dramatic age reduction in a post-flood world scenario?

Check out our other podcasts:
studio.youtube.com/channel/UCXugrn…ontent/podcasts