
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
FOUR days after both the Lomachenko-Lopez and Ritson-Vazquez fights were tainted by some controversial scorecards, Matt Christie and Alex Steedman ask that age-old question: What's up with boxing judges?
Points they consider:
- Room for subjectivity?
- The issue of point of view
- How to score a fight
- Should more be done from governing bodies in regard to bad performance?
- Is the Board right to silence their officials?
Also up for discussion, in no particular order, is: Further analysis of Loma-Lopez and their respective futures; Joshua-Pulev; the WBC and their many champions; Danny Williams' victory over Mark Potter; Crawford-Brook.
Thanks for listening (and if you like what you hear please take a moment to rate, subscribe and review).
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
4.6
2121 ratings
FOUR days after both the Lomachenko-Lopez and Ritson-Vazquez fights were tainted by some controversial scorecards, Matt Christie and Alex Steedman ask that age-old question: What's up with boxing judges?
Points they consider:
- Room for subjectivity?
- The issue of point of view
- How to score a fight
- Should more be done from governing bodies in regard to bad performance?
- Is the Board right to silence their officials?
Also up for discussion, in no particular order, is: Further analysis of Loma-Lopez and their respective futures; Joshua-Pulev; the WBC and their many champions; Danny Williams' victory over Mark Potter; Crawford-Brook.
Thanks for listening (and if you like what you hear please take a moment to rate, subscribe and review).
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
38 Listeners
79 Listeners
29 Listeners
984 Listeners
170 Listeners
99 Listeners
73 Listeners
73 Listeners
696 Listeners
17 Listeners
258 Listeners
29 Listeners
12 Listeners
9 Listeners
12 Listeners