SecurityTrails Blog

SecurityTrails Blog

By SecurityTrailsTechnologyTech News
Download on the App Store

SecurityTrails Blog episodes

  • August Product Update: Exposed Admin Panels, Risk Rules API, Risk History by Host, and more!
    At SecurityTrails we continuously upgrade, improve and enhance the quality of user experience in our Attack Surface Intelligence platform.
    Today, we are thrilled to announce several Attack Surface Intelligence updates we've recently been working on: Risk History by Host, Risk Rules API, Search for Signatures, and other upgrades! Keep reading to learn more.
    Admin Panel detections in Inventory
    A great new feature from our latest release is Admin Panels, located within the Inventory tab. This option will help you locate administrator panels in mere seconds. This allows security teams to find exposed control panels from popular technologies and software, which may be out of compliance with policies, and therefore, adding unnecessary risk to your organization. Among its many highlights, the Admin Panel feature:
    Works on deep paths. Works on IPs without hostnames. Includes firewalls, enterprise software, developer tools, and CMS's. Adds new signatures frequently and automatically.
    On that interface, you'll find a Counts by Panel summary, where you'll find the top exposed panels, along with the number of affected IP addresses and hostnames. Scrolling down, you'll also find the full list of panels we found, along with a description, the port where it was found, the affected service, and a quick target link so you can jump right into each one of them:
    Risk Rules API
    The new Risk Rules API allows users to get immediate data for CVEs, including vulnerability name, description, risk severity (classification), affected hostnames, technical references found on the Internet, and project metadata such as ID, title and snapshot creation date.
    Risk History by Host
    The new Risk History by Host feature is the perfect tool for keeping an historical tracking of your current vulnerabilities and misconfigurations. By listing them, you'll know when they appeared for the very first time, and most importantly when they were cleared (fixed, patched) and no longer showing on the Risk Rules report. As shown in the above screenshot, you can also filter the Risk History by Severity or Event type (added or cleared), and even export the results into a CSV file.
    End-user ability to search signatures
    This new feature gives Attack Surface Intelligence users the ability to search for risk signatures, so customers can determine whether to check for a certain vulnerability or if a misconfiguration is present on our Attack Surface Intelligence checks, as shown in the following screenshot. SecurityTrails periodically releases updates that improve the performance, security, and logic of your experience in Attack Surface Intelligence. By enhancing the usability of the Attack Surface Intelligence interface, we create a new environment that allows you to identify and prevent threats much more effortlessly. Why don't you try it yourself and facilitate your most thorough and effective way of protection?
    Book your demo now!
    3 min
  • The CVE Approach: A Reductionist Way to Handle the Attack Surface
    As recently as the 1990s, the information security industry lacked a fundamental mechanism to deal with the notion of sharing both hardware and software vulnerabilities using any sort of meaningful taxonomy.
    Previous efforts—largely encumbered by vendor-specific naming convention inconsistencies or by the lack of a community consensus around establishing classification primitives—were centered on multidimensional methods of identifying security problems without regard for interoperability; in a seminal progress report, MITRE will later refer to this budding cacophony of naming schemas as the vulnerability "Tower of Babel." Over the years, a community-led effort formally known as the [Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (or CVE) knowledge base, will grow to become the vulnerability enumeration product that finally bridged the standardization gap.
    A (very) brief history of CVE
    In 1999, as David E. Mann and Steven M. Christey (The MITRE Corporation) were trying to gather momentum for a publicly disclosed alternative to early attempts by organizations at sharing any discovered computer flaws, the internet was already buzzing with a growing number of cybersecurity threats. Consequently, CVE's meteoric rise through corporate networks clearly meant that the industry was ripe for a departure from siloed databases and naming conventions to a more centralized approach involving a unified reference system. Thus, CVE evolved as a practical evaluation tool—a sort of dictionary, if you will—to describe common vulnerabilities across diverse security platforms without incurring the penalty of having a multitude of references attributed to the same exposure. Its subsequent endorsement will come in many forms, including being the point of origin of countless new CVE-compatible products and services originating from the vendor community at large.
    In addition, as the CVE initiative grew, so did the number of identifiers (or CVE entries) officially received and processed through several refinement phases and advisory boards—from a modest 321 entries back in 1999 to over 185K as of this year; the list keeps growing. A second major catalyst for integration orients us toward operating systems and their inclusion of CVE-related information to deal with software bugs and the inherent asymmetries that arise from product release to patching, as it is well understood that the presence of any high-impact vulnerabilities exponentially increases the probability of a serious breach. Finally, CVEs are the cornerstone of threat-informed defense and vulnerability management strategies in a digital world visibly marked by the presence of miscreants in practically every area, combining these under the banner of the MITRE ATT&CK® framework.
    This sort of objectivity distills and contextualizes the impact of security vulnerabilities together with adversarial tactics against the risk assessment backdrop, providing defenders with a unique opportunity to plan any mitigation responses accordingly. But, what qualifies as a CVE? In short, a vulnerability becomes a single CVE when the following three criteria are met:
    The reporting entity, product owner, hardware, or software vendor must acknowledge and/or document the vulnerability as being a proven risk and explain how it violates any existing security policies. The security flaw must be independently fixable; that is, its context representation does not involve references or dependence on any additional vulnerabilities. The flaw affects a discrete codebase, or in cases of shared libraries and/or protocols that cannot be used securely; otherwise, multiple CVEs will be required.
    After the remainder of the vetting process is complete, every vulnerability that qualifies as a CVE is assigned a unique ID by a body of numbering authorities (or CNAs) and posted on the CVE website for public distribution.
    CVE and the attack surface
    With the frantic expansion of the attack surface beginning some years ago came the visibility i...
    8 min
  • The Role of Cloud Misconfigurations & the Attack Surface in the 2022 Verizon Deebir
    Note: The audio version doesn't include code or commands. Those parts of the post can be seen in the text version.
    This year's 15th installment of the Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR) features yet another impressive dataset of corporate breaches and exposures marked by an overriding postulate: attack surfaces matter and they should dictate a large portion of your risk assessment strategy.
    First launched in 2008, the DBIR's 2022 version has been significantly expanded, from a modest amount of 500 cases, to include 5212 breaches and 23896 incidents examined through the lens of the VERIS 4A's (Actor, Action, Asset, and Attribute) framework. Its timeline section looks at comprehensive aspects such as discovery time, any attacker actions taken pre, and post-breach, and the number of actions per breach. Additionally, there is a pattern-matching initiative to help organizations navigate through some of the most concerning incidents while providing a handful of preliminary security controls.
    Industry verticals included in this 2022 report include Accommodation and Food Services (72), Arts, Entertainment and Recreation (71), Educational Services (61), Financial and Insurance (52), Healthcare (62), Information (51), Manufacturing (31 to 33), Mining, Quarrying, and Oil & Gas Extraction + Utilities (21 + 22), Professional, Scientific and Technical Services (54), Public Administration (92), Retail (44-45), and Very Small Businesses (10 employees or less). The report highlights threats from different regions of the world such as Asia Pacific, Europe, Middle East, Africa, Northern America, Latin America, and the Caribbean, with SecurityTrails playing the role of intelligence contributor as in the recent past.
    Summary of key findings
    Through a series of carefully-selected and correlated investigative scenarios, a collective effort that the DBIR refers to as "creative exploration", albeit without bias, the report's findings continue to highlight several areas of interest from where cybercrime continues to drive profit. For example, identity theft and fraud motivate an important sector of transnational cybercrime, with some of the most explicit cases centered on the use of ransomware, no surprise there. However, a bustling amount of incidents, where default or stolen credentials are being leveraged, extended the attack paths with relative ease, opportunistic or not, the problem showed evidence of being compounded by a growing lack of adequate visibility into publicly-facing assets and (any) corresponding vulnerabilities. At the tail end of the distribution, the vulnerability-to-breach ratios remained particularly significant.
    To put it in the DBIR's own parlance, this is where attackers are looking (it's a numbers game!); a sustainable environment with enough incentives as miscreants come hard on the heels of struggling security teams. Important, too, are the enticing circumstances applicable to different industries. In other words, and perhaps not surprisingly, attacks based on a specific business model are likely to be more successful in the long run. An observed convergence between the human element and system misconfigurations remained just above the 5th percentile (a decrease from 2020), but it drove an estimated 13% of overall system breaches, with misconfigured cloud storage instances leading the trend.
    How Attack Surface Intelligence helps prevent DBIR’s most popular threats
    As we can see from the key findings from the 2022 DBIR, lack of visibility into public-facing assets is one of the most prominent problems inhibiting security teams from preventing threats to their organizations. Since we introduced Risk Rules, our main goal was to help security teams find an easy way to generate a complete and dynamic inventory of all their digital assets, as well as identify CVEs and critical misconfigurations over all their hosts. And when it comes to asset discovery, as you see from the following screenshot, A-S-I is particula...
    7 min
  • The Role of Cloud Misconfigurations & the Attack Surface in the 2022 Verizon DBIR
    Note: The audio version doesn't include code or commands. Those parts of the post can be seen in the text version.
    This year's 15th installment of the Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR) features yet another impressive dataset of corporate breaches and exposures marked by an overriding postulate: attack surfaces matter and they should dictate a large portion of your risk assessment strategy.
    First launched in 2008, the DBIR's 2022 version has been significantly expanded, from a modest amount of 500 cases, to include 5212 breaches and 23896 incidents examined through the lens of the VERIS 4A's (Actor, Action, Asset, and Attribute) framework. Its timeline section looks at comprehensive aspects such as discovery time, any attacker actions taken pre, and post-breach, and the number of actions per breach. Additionally, there is a pattern-matching initiative to help organizations navigate through some of the most concerning incidents while providing a handful of preliminary security controls.
    Industry verticals included in this 2022 report include Accommodation and Food Services (72), Arts, Entertainment and Recreation (71), Educational Services (61), Financial and Insurance (52), Healthcare (62), Information (51), Manufacturing (31 to 33), Mining, Quarrying, and Oil & Gas Extraction + Utilities (21 + 22), Professional, Scientific and Technical Services (54), Public Administration (92), Retail (44-45), and Very Small Businesses (10 employees or less). The report highlights threats from different regions of the world such as Asia Pacific, Europe, Middle East, Africa, Northern America, Latin America, and the Caribbean, with SecurityTrails playing the role of intelligence contributor as in the recent past.
    Summary of key findings
    Through a series of carefully-selected and correlated investigative scenarios, a collective effort that the DBIR refers to as "creative exploration", albeit without bias, the report's findings continue to highlight several areas of interest from where cybercrime continues to drive profit. For example, identity theft and fraud motivate an important sector of transnational cybercrime, with some of the most explicit cases centered on the use of ransomware, no surprise there. However, a bustling amount of incidents, where default or stolen credentials are being leveraged, extended the attack paths with relative ease, opportunistic or not, the problem showed evidence of being compounded by a growing lack of adequate visibility into publicly-facing assets and (any) corresponding vulnerabilities. At the tail end of the distribution, the vulnerability-to-breach ratios remained particularly significant.
    To put it in the DBIR's own parlance, this is where attackers are looking (it's a numbers game!); a sustainable environment with enough incentives as miscreants come hard on the heels of struggling security teams. Important, too, are the enticing circumstances applicable to different industries. In other words, and perhaps not surprisingly, attacks based on a specific business model are likely to be more successful in the long run. An observed convergence between the human element and system misconfigurations remained just above the 5th percentile (a decrease from 2020), but it drove an estimated 13% of overall system breaches, with misconfigured cloud storage instances leading the trend.
    How Attack Surface Intelligence helps prevent DBIR’s most popular threats
    As we can see from the key findings from the 2022 DBIR, lack of visibility into public-facing assets is one of the most prominent problems inhibiting security teams from preventing threats to their organizations. Since we introduced Risk Rules, our main goal was to help security teams find an easy way to generate a complete and dynamic inventory of all their digital assets, as well as identify CVEs and critical misconfigurations over all their hosts. And when it comes to asset discovery, as you see from the following screenshot, A-S-I is particula...
    7 min
  • Prepare, Detect, Respond: Reduce Your Risk of Cyber Attack with Attack Surface Intelligence
    With the rise in cybersecurity attacks targeting individuals and corporations alike, it's become increasingly important not only to ensure preparedness for cybersecurity attacks but to set up processes for early detection and response as well.
    The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, commonly known as the C-I-S-A, is an agency of the United States government that actively watches for cybersecurity threats and provides ways to secure various organizations (including other governmental agencies), families, and individuals. The C-I-S-A Shields Up program is a cybersecurity effort aimed at combating state-sponsored and other retaliatory cybersecurity attacks launched against organizations and individuals based in the United States. Shields Up outlines clear cybersecurity procedures for dealing with the most targeted methods of cybersecurity attacks, usually directed at organizations, families, and individuals including, notably, corporate leaders.
    Protection for families and individuals
    It's becoming more and more commonplace for everyone in a household to have their own set of personal devices. These include mobile phones, tablets, laptops, and desktops. Devices like mobile phones and tablets offer themselves as easy targets for cybersecurity attacks. Their in-app advertisements and other web-based campaigns can lead to malware being downloaded onto a device, making it imperative to follow certain cybersecurity practices to ensure that you and your family members remain safe. With basic mobile phones and tablets being sold with over 64G-128GB of on-device storage, one can imagine the amount of identifiable, personal, and easily usable information that each device can hold. The C-I-S-A's Shields Up program outlines a list of steps for individuals and families to follow in the interest of preparing themselves for and staying secure from cybersecurity-related threats.
    Protection for corporate leaders
    When it comes to cyberattacks, phishing attacks, and ransomware, corporate leaders like company directors, financial heads and CEOs are among the most targeted members of organizations. CEOs and other company leaders are commonly attacked as their systems and email accounts generally hold more useful information than others in a company. Following the guidelines laid out by the C-I-S-A's Shields Up program helps corporate leaders and CEOs stay safe and secure in the face of cybersecurity-related threats.
    Protection for organizations
    While protection for organizations is usually handled by cybersecurity experts, the most common sources of cybersecurity attacks on organizations originate from basic points of entry, such as VPN entry points, remote desktops, and other areas typically left unsecured. Fortunately, Shields Up outlines a list of steps that organizations can follow to stay secure against cybersecurity-related threats.
    How can Attack Surface Intelligence help your organization?
    Preparation
    The SecurityTrails Attack Surface Intelligence, A-S-I platform helps transform your security process from being reactive to proactive, and therefore preventive. This allows your organization to be better prepared for any possible cyberattacks and to stay ahead of cybercriminals. With automation being the key strength in heading off attacks, A-S-I ensures that persistent monitoring, CVE detection, and parsing of your organization's virtual assets is no longer a long and tedious process.
    A-S-I platform features and subjects include:
    Automatic detection and listing of IP addresses belonging to your organization. ASN, networks on which your organization's assets are hosted. Full domain and subdomain mapping. Detection of dev and staging subdomains. Open ports within your organization, for critical services such as databases. Self-signed SSL certificates issued within your organization. Web server vendors and versions used within your organization. Risk detection, and much more!
    Consider the very first step of any cybersecurity proc...
    8 min
  • Monitoring Your Digital Assets for Compliance
    Following the trends set forth by our post-pandemic world, organizations continue to accelerate digitalization and reliance on technology to improve decision making while increasing the efficiency of their communications, all in their efforts to simply optimize business operations. Additionally, the rise in popularity of remote work has enhanced workforce flexibility and satisfaction as well as business continuity. But nothing great can come without risk.
    As organizations IT infrastructures grow to accommodate all of these advancements, digital assets and resources continue to expand too, and not often flowing neatly into easily visible and monitored areas. Furthermore, the growth of cyber threats aimed at those digital assets make fighting various types of cybercrime a priority for every organization.
    The compliance side of the digital transformation coin
    As cybersecurity threats continue to grow, so do data loss prevention trends. This phenomenon is led by government-imposed regulations such as GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS, and the growing myriad of new security policies imposed by various agencies for the handling of sensitive assets. The cost associated with lacking an efficient and effective compliance program is growing too. Along with the reputational damage organizations can suffer, studies have shown that organizations can lose an average of $4 million in revenue due to a single non-compliance event. In order to properly adhere to these regulations, organizations need to understand the full scope of their IT infrastructure, which includes knowing what assets they have, where they're located and who is responsible for them. And with today's complex IT infrastructure that includes both on-prem and cloud environments as well as forgotten and shadow infrastructures, this comes as a challenge.
    The more assets an organization has, the harder it is to gain a full view of them. Managing numerous assets makes spotting security misconfigurations or policy violations among them that much more difficult. Persistent monitoring of their infrastructure, however, can provide real-time visibility into an organization's ever-changing digital assets, allowing them to identify any compliance gaps. And rather than relying upon various types of disparate tooling to achieve this, when having to identify, inventory, classify and monitor digital assets can only add to an already complex environment, a single platform to provide that kind of unified attack surface monitoring process arrives as a solution.
    Leading your compliance efforts with ASR
    Our leading platform Attack Surface Reduction (ASR) provides organizations with much-needed attack surface monitoring and a comprehensive understanding of all their digital assets as well as their location, ownership, services, and the technologies running on them, all to keep security teams aware of any potential security risks disrupting regulatory compliance.
    How can ASR guide your compliance efforts?
    Know the location of your every asset
    A large number of organizations employ both an incomplete asset discovery process and an obsolete asset inventory. And like we always say: you can't protect what you can't see. A forgotten or unknown asset is impossible to secure, offering a sure path to a security event, regulatory penalties and fines. With Attack Surface Reduction, you'll be able to gain a complete view across your external infrastructure, allowing you to improve your security posture and lead your compliance program. ASR provides you with a single source of truth regarding the location of each of your internet-connected assets, and reveals any new changes that have been made within your infrastructure, including when and where any new asset is discovered. This way, any shadow or forgotten infrastructure, easy entry points for malicious actors, and easy risks of failure to comply with government and industry regulations, is immediately discovered by ASR.
    Detect immediate risks and out-of-policy assets...
    8 min
  • 5 Steps to Protect Your Enterprise’s Attack Surface
    With the increases in cyber attacks and vulnerabilities detected every day, it's become even more challenging to stay on top of every aspect of your organization's security.
    Securing your organization is no longer as simple as it was in the past, thanks to the rise in various types of attacks, including targeted attacks towards employees in the form of phishing emails, DNS hijacking, and organizations prioritizing application availability and spreading servers, cloud deployments over various cloud providers. Also, tech stacks and software libraries used in your applications are growing larger with various dependencies, leading to further complexities with regard to an organization's overall security.
    How the attack surface grows with any organization
    With the advent of the global pandemic, remote working has become the go-to solution for organizations all over the world. This, in turn, has yielded consequences such as the rise in social engineering attacks, and other forms of targeted attacks. This is because each employee of an organization has become even more targetable while working in a non-maintained home networking environment. For example, if an employee works from home, the employee is often connected to the internet with an ISP-provided WiFi router and modem. These devices frequently run with firmware that is vulnerable or outdated, as they don't receive updates as often as enterprise-based networking gear. So if the same employee works from an office, where enterprise-grade firewalls and networking gear are used, a certain amount of risk is eliminated, risk that could originate from compromised networking gear.
    While VPNs provide a great amount of security for accessing a corporation's internal assets, there is always a risk of malware entering the employee's work devices through compromised networking gear at home, whenever the VPN connection is disconnected or disrupted.
    Looking beyond an organization's employees
    With increasing demands in the reliability and availability of an organization's products, today's organizations have been forced to spread assets over various cloud providers. In the past, a single cloud provider would most likely handle a complete application end-to-end, but spreading an application across multiple cloud vendors has caused a notable increase in the size of the attack surface, with each cloud provider handling ACLs differently, at times, even working with differences in UI or the way certain tasks are handled within a cloud provider. And with multiple cloud vendors, the number of attack vectors increases as well. One cloud vendor getting compromised can lead to the entire application getting compromised. Putting the size of an organization aside, the tech stacks and libraries it uses can also lead to security-based issues. While using popular software libraries is generally considered a good idea, a vulnerability among them can lead to much larger issues.
    Consider the recent impact of the vulnerability in the Log for J library, a simple yet widely used logging tool. This led to multiple compromises of web applications, all of which needed immediate patching as a large number of the organizations affected had these applications operating on the public internet. Simply put, your attack surface is as spread out as your organization is, and on all fronts. The more widespread your resources (such as employees, cloud servers, tech stack, libraries, etc.) are, the larger your attack surface grows.
    How can you safeguard your attack surface?
    To begin using SecurityTrails Attack Surface Reduction (ASR), head over to your account and click on "Access Surface Browser".
    Next, click on the "Projects" option in the navbar. Once there, click on "Create a New Project". Give your project a name and enter the domain name of your organization, then click on "Create Project".
    Now, let's take a look at five ways in which your organization can leverage the power of the SecurityTrails ASR tool:
    1. Asset mapp...
    10 min
  • 5 Steps to Protect Your Enterprise’s Attack Surface
    With the increases in cyber attacks and vulnerabilities detected every day, it's become even more challenging to stay on top of every aspect of your organization's security.
    Securing your organization is no longer as simple as it was in the past, thanks to the rise in various types of attacks, including targeted attacks towards employees in the form of phishing emails, DNS hijacking, and organizations prioritizing application availability and spreading servers, cloud deployments over various cloud providers. Also, tech stacks and software libraries used in your applications are growing larger with various dependencies, leading to further complexities with regard to an organization's overall security.
    How the attack surface grows with any organization
    With the advent of the global pandemic, remote working has become the go-to solution for organizations all over the world. This, in turn, has yielded consequences such as the rise in social engineering attacks, and other forms of targeted attacks. This is because each employee of an organization has become even more targetable while working in a non-maintained home networking environment. For example, if an employee works from home, the employee is often connected to the internet with an ISP-provided WiFi router and modem. These devices frequently run with firmware that is vulnerable or outdated, as they don't receive updates as often as enterprise-based networking gear. So if the same employee works from an office, where enterprise-grade firewalls and networking gear are used, a certain amount of risk is eliminated, risk that could originate from compromised networking gear.
    While VPNs provide a great amount of security for accessing a corporation's internal assets, there is always a risk of malware entering the employee's work devices through compromised networking gear at home, whenever the VPN connection is disconnected or disrupted.
    Looking beyond an organization's employees
    With increasing demands in the reliability and availability of an organization's products, today's organizations have been forced to spread assets over various cloud providers. In the past, a single cloud provider would most likely handle a complete application end-to-end, but spreading an application across multiple cloud vendors has caused a notable increase in the size of the attack surface, with each cloud provider handling ACLs differently, at times, even working with differences in UI or the way certain tasks are handled within a cloud provider. And with multiple cloud vendors, the number of attack vectors increases as well. One cloud vendor getting compromised can lead to the entire application getting compromised. Putting the size of an organization aside, the tech stacks and libraries it uses can also lead to security-based issues. While using popular software libraries is generally considered a good idea, a vulnerability among them can lead to much larger issues.
    Consider the recent impact of the vulnerability in the Log for J library, a simple yet widely used logging tool. This led to multiple compromises of web applications, all of which needed immediate patching as a large number of the organizations affected had these applications operating on the public internet. Simply put, your attack surface is as spread out as your organization is, and on all fronts. The more widespread your resources (such as employees, cloud servers, tech stack, libraries, etc.) are, the larger your attack surface grows.
    How can you safeguard your attack surface?
    To begin using SecurityTrails Attack Surface Reduction (ASR), head over to your account and click on "Access Surface Browser".
    Next, click on the "Projects" option in the navbar. Once there, click on "Create a New Project". Give your project a name and enter the domain name of your organization, then click on "Create Project".
    Now, let's take a look at five ways in which your organization can leverage the power of the SecurityTrails ASR tool:
    1. Asset mapp...
    10 min
  • February Product Updates: ASR Technologies & SurfaceBrowser IP-Blocks Downloads
    We've been hard at work getting our product updates ready and we're thrilled to kick them off for 2022. Today, we're announcing new feature launches and updates for our Attack Surface Reduction (ASR)] and Surface Browser platforms.
    Detailed Application View
    In November, we rolled out our beta Explorer tab, bringing with it new and exciting capabilities. One of which was improved visual web app identification with the use of home page screenshots, allowing you to visualize screenshots of all assets. Today, we introduce you to Detailed Application View, a new feature of the Beta Explorer Screenshots page. Access to Beta Explorer will allow you to test this significant upgrade by clicking on an item, which will bring up a window that provides even more detailed information on a given application: screenshots and detected technologies.
    IP-Blocks Downloads
    During the last year, the IP-Blocks Downloads feature within Surface Browser was being brought back into production. Now we're excited to finally re-release this important asset, complete with improved performance of the Downloads operation. Access to the reworked feature in Surface Browser can be gained via the following path: /app/sb/domain/[domain]/ip-blocks. As always, you'll be able to download IP-Blocks results in both JSON and CSV format.
    Activity Heatmap
    Surface Browser scores even more improvements, including Activity Heatmap, now added to /app/sb/domain/[domain]/activity. By using this feature you'll be able to view all newly observed assets created by day for a given domain. This provides a chronological representation of your organization's surface area, letting you visualize exactly when each asset was added to your infrastructure.
    Conclusion
    From the Detailed Application View which will provide deeper data points, to the IP Blocks Download which allows export of our data, to the Activity Heatmap which improves visualization and input into your ever-evolving external infrastructure, new features and improvements in ASR and Surface Browser will provide more functionality, more data and a better user experience overall. Take advantage of these new developments, and benefit from a new perspective into all of your digital assets, infrastructure and potential security risks. Book a demo and discover all you can do with Attack Surface Reduction!
    3 min
  • A CISO’s Perspective on Attack Surface Reduction: Security Trails Fireside Chat with Terence Runge
    2021 was a tumultuous period for cybersecurity: it was a record year for the number of reported data breaches. And who can forget Log for j vulnerability, Colonial Pipeline and Kaseya ransomware?
    Combine that with the continuous growth of cloudification and remote worker sprawl as well as constant supplier diversification and mergers and acquisitions, and you get dynamic attack surfaces in organizations that can be highly challenging to manage. With the ever-changing IT environment organizations must now handle, CISOs and business leaders are turning to new strategies and solutions to help them manage and reduce their organizations' attack surface. To learn how modern CISOs are tackling these new challenges, we were joined by Terence Runge, a seasoned CISO and CISSP with over 20 years of experience working with various cybersecurity companies, and one of the early adopters of our Attack Surface Reduction platform. "I discovered some private IP addresses being published to public DNS and wanted to know how prevalent it was in the company. I have done some work in this area with open source tools, and had an idea that there were around 1,200 or so exposed systems.
    Lo and behold, Security trails got involved and discovered that there were several thousands and that the attack surface is very dynamic, growing each day." In the January edition of Security trails Fireside Chat, our VP of Sales Scott Donnelly sat down with Terence Runge for a session on the CISO's perspective on attack surface reduction. Key topics included:
    What the attack surface looks like in this ever-changing world. How supplier risk assessments can drive attack surface understanding. Enforcing policies for remote workers in large organizations. Why asset inventory is a must for efficient attack surface reduction.
    How a CISO handles the continuously changing attack surface
    Defining an attack surface from the CISO's perspective starts with considering all systems and services that adversarial attackers can discover from their vantage point, then use to infiltrate your network. But going beyond systems and services, Terence also covers other assets associated with the organization: "An attack surface can be made up of any properties associated with the company, and with past acquisitions, as well as any code, public open repositories, keys, passphrases, secrets, both belonging to the company but also to their customers."
    Third-party risk
    All of the properties that make up the attack surface are changing every day. Furthermore, many events in an organization can change their attack surface, such as M&As, where findings from a security assessment led by analysis of the target organization's attack surface can make or break the deal. Suppliers are also an important third party in an attack surface. Regarding supplier security, Terence puts location, where they're hosting data and cyber hygiene, at the top of the checklist. "When assessing a new supplier, we go further than a regular check and look at their attack surface. We do this for several reasons: one is that we will potentially be entrusting them with either access to our systems or our data so we need to know if they have exposures."
    Securing the remote workforce
    Another important aspect of modern, dynamic attack surfaces are remote workers and the implementation of policies as a CISO in a remote world. Terence highlights strong authentication as the main story for a remote workforce. Utilizing multi-factor authentication, single sign-on, VPNs and similar processes for authenticating users is key for Terence, but other basics for device authentication should not be forgotten: "Device encryption, policies applied. all of this creates what we call a 'Reltio Authorized Device', a RAD device."
    Scanning cloud assets
    For any modern IT environment, cloud assets are an expected part of the attack surface. And scanning and enumerating these cloud assets has its own set of challenges, depending on both the size of t...
    6 min

About SecurityTrails Blog

From the publisher's feed

Listen to all the articles we release on our blog while commuting, while working or in bed.