In Part 2 of Selling the Cloud, conversation with Kristina Jaramillo, President of Personal ABM, dives deeper into how ABM becomes a true revenue engine when it’s embedded across the entire go-to-market team.
Kristina focuses on post-sale motion; how ABM supports retention and expansion, closes the sales-marketing gap, and helps GTM teams drive value beyond the initial deal. She also shares how executive alignment, buyer enablement, and account-specific orchestration lead to stronger pipeline outcomes.
What You’ll Learn:
- ABM for Retention and Expansion: Why post-sale ABM delivers faster ROI and stronger pipeline impact.
- Marketing-Sales Orchestration: How marketing enables—not just hands off—the selling conversation through strategic content and insights.
- Leadership Alignment for Revenue: The importance of CRO-CMO collaboration and how it drives true go-to-market accountability.
- Multi-Channel Buyer Relevance: How to use platforms like LinkedIn to drive engagement beyond generic outreach.
- Revenue-Led Metrics: What to actually measure in ABM, from NRR and deal influence to buyer group engagement.
Key Topics:
- ABM’s role in revenue beyond acquisition
- Moving from pipeline handoff to full-cycle enablement
- How to align GTM leadership across sales and marketing
- Using account insights, not just intent data
- Orchestrating account experiences across buyer groups
- Redefining the marketer’s role in late-stage deals
Guest Spotlight: Kristina Jaramillo
Kristina is President of Personal ABM and host of the ABM Done Right podcast. She works with B2B tech and SaaS companies to move beyond automation-driven tactics and build strategic, account-relevant go-to-market programs that generate real revenue growth.
Resources & Mentions:
- Podcast: ABM Done Right
- Go-to-market strategist to follow: Sangram Vajre
- Recommended Books:
- The Challenger Sale
- The Challenger Customer
- The JOLT Effect
🎧 Listen now and follow Selling the Cloud for more GTM insights from leading voices in enterprise growth. Subscribe wherever you get your podcasts.
KK Anderson (00:01.573)
Hello and welcome to today's episode of Selling the Cloud podcast. We're excited to welcome Christina Jaramillo, president of Personal ABM. Christina is a trailblazer in strategic account marketing. Her firm specializes in helping tech and SaaS companies evolve their go-to-market strategies to land and expand six and seven figure enterprise accounts. Unlike
many ABM programs focused on automation and intent signals, Christina's approach centers on creating highly relevant one-to-one experiences that influence every stage of the buying journey and drive real revenue outcomes. And so today, Christina is going to share with us what it really takes to succeed in the enterprise space, especially for mid-market companies trying to move up market.
So today we're gonna explore four themes with Christina. First, we'll talk about redefining your ideal customer profile, your ICP, and enterprise buyer personas. And we'll talk about how do you align that? Your targeting, your messaging, and how do you get that message right with enterprise priorities? Second, we're gonna talk about fixing flawed ABM programs.
Why are so many intent-based, persona-based, ABN programs failing? And how can you rebuild them around account-specific insights and business cases? Third, we're gonna talk about what's not working anymore in B2B marketing. Okay, spray and pray email sequences, generic content, we all know it's no longer cutting it. So we're gonna talk about things that we can do instead. And then finally, fourth,
We're gonna talk about turning the marketing to sales handoff, turning the marketing to sales handoff into a handshake. We all know that there's usually some kind of an island or a gap between marketing and sales. And the real trick is closing that gap. And Christina is gonna talk to us about how we can support that handshake. This episode is packed with practical insights for revenue leaders looking to break into larger accounts.
KK Anderson (02:21.889)
improve win rates, and align sales and marketing. Let's dive in. Welcome, Christina, to Selling the Cloud.
Kristina Jaramillo (02:29.602)
Thank you so much for having me. I'm looking forward to the conversation.
KK Anderson (02:32.077)
Yes, we are so excited that you are here today. So let's jump into the first topic, which is redefining your ICP and your enterprise buyer personas. And you've said in our conversations that so many companies that are trying to move up market fail to really, truly redefine their ideal customer profile. So start with.
maybe describing what's the difference between an ICP when you're targeting a mid-market buyer or an enterprise buyer.
Kristina Jaramillo (03:08.344)
Yeah. So first off, I'm going to say that most companies don't necessarily have a ICP in the first place. They might have an ideal customer segments or a total relevant market, which is has sales and marketing teams guessing where they should be prioritizing accounts, where they should be focusing on. So your ICP is your ideal customer. So they're the ones that should be the ones that are predictive of accounts landing, expanding with you, because they align with you. They're going to align with you in a couple of ways. It's operationally.
executionally and culturally. These are the ones that are strategically ready for your solution as well and ready to implement with success. They're the ones that have a key strategic priority in place that your solution, your platform, whatever you're selling can play a role in. So no matter how much pain you solve, an enterprise is really not going to move forward with a deal if it doesn't fit into their existing strategic priorities.
These are the ones that you have a differentiated situational story to tell. So we all know enterprise deals are inherently longer and they're getting longer, you know, currently, and they're more complex. They require more time, more resources and focus. So you don't want to be wasting your time and your team's time on accounts that are most likely not going to move forward or they're going to get stuck in indecision or churn after a deal is closed. So it's really important that we redefine our ICP and keep optimizing that ICP.
because the market changes, your business changes, your customers and your focus changes. So your ICP definition is really going to make sure that you are winning or losing deals and how accounts enter or leave the pipeline. So traditionally, I still see a lot of organizations focusing their enterprise ICP on pretty generic broad.
So like industry, company size, revenue, technographics, maybe a superficial look alike. So I've seen stats saying that when you do things like that, you're cutting your win rate by at least 60%. I've seen even closer to 70. And while companies, I know it's kind of scary, but while companies are building their pipeline with these enterprise accounts, win weights are dropping. And it's a lot because companies are spending time on enterprises that...
Kristina Jaramillo (05:28.95)
are not likely to land and if they do, they might turn. And if they land, they might not ever expand. So account-based go-to market, which we specialize in, is about aligning that complete marketing function with sales, with customer success, so that we focus on the ICP as a team versus just that total relevant market, which is what a lot of companies I've seen have focused on. The ICP that you focus on are the accounts that are predictive of landing and expanding with you.
So we need to focus on what are those characteristics of those key enterprises? What are characteristics of enterprises that are strategically ready for you? So for example, most companies are not yet structured to succeed with AI. They might want to move forward. They might be very interested. They might be looking, but they're not set up if they bought an AI solution to maybe use it to its full potential. So there's a risk return, even though there could be greater success.
So what we really need to think about is where are we relevant, where our competitors are relevant, and then think about the strategic priorities where we should be looking for in a prospect. And then the situations where we have that differentiated situational story to tell. So it requires more work and it's not something that just kind of sits in a pitch deck somewhere or in a slide somewhere, it never gets revamped.
KK Anderson (06:53.093)
Wow, that's quite a lot. So...
you know, as you are shifting and, and I guess it's way more than just segmenting is what I'm hearing you say. Right. It's more around the strategic priorities. And so, so like, what are some of those blind spots that companies have?
Kristina Jaramillo (07:07.47)
Yes, that's why we need to be real.
Kristina Jaramillo (07:17.656)
think they either let marketing define it or let sales define it, or they each have their own version of it. And there's, it's not like a cohesive one that you should be able to ask someone in both sides of the team and even customer success. And they should have very similar, if not identical definitions. And I think that's why there's that disconnect in pipeline numbers and revenue numbers and closed deals and things like that. It's so that we know.
KK Anderson (07:22.906)
out.
Kristina Jaramillo (07:46.39)
It's not a matter of like aligning all these teams internally, the go-to marketing. It's really about orchestrating and moving together as one. So whatever marketing does influences sales and then sales influences customer success. And it goes all the way again, when you do up in a circle, because customer marketing would get involved if that's something that your organization has. it's, it's everyone agreeing on it. And again, that whole revisiting it, not just letting it kind of be a stagnant thing.
KK Anderson (08:12.411)
So how do you determine what those strategic priorities are that your target market might have in common, know, over and above just typical thermographics?
Kristina Jaramillo (08:25.154)
Yeah, so what we typically do is we'll go to the customers that are the best customers. So the ones that are getting the most value, the ones that are using the platform or solution the most, and the ones that have great stories and examples to sell, and then kind of go by that. What do they look like before they came to us? Would they look like six months into implementation, 12 months, 18, whatever, and then try to go backwards. the approach that I'm talking about is a very narrow approach. So it's not.
necessarily scalable right away. It's what we've learned from this type of approach to scale our campaigns, scale our outreach, scale our nurture sequences. So we want to make sure that if we're selling six figure deals, that's our high end maybe. We want to look at what is that account that has closed at that and has all these characteristics that I just spoke about. And how can we kind of
target organizations that may be similar, but also we tell their relevant story. So we're not just telling the industry or persona story, we tell that account story. And then we can kind of scale back or scale that kind of approach and do it for like the one to few and one to many type of ABM approaches there are.
KK Anderson (09:37.659)
And so Define for me, I heard you say we tell the account story. So just for the person that's listening for our audience, just give a quick background on this whole concept of tier one, tier two, tier three, or one to many, one to few, one to one.
Kristina Jaramillo (09:54.014)
Okay. So to, yeah, yeah. One to many is more like demand gen in general, what people know demand gen to be. So you're basically trying to fill the pipeline. One to few is maybe they've engaged and they progressed a little further in their journey. So they're a little more relevant as you get further and further down. like from the one to many to one to few to one to one, you're getting more and more relevant. And one to one is I've heard people describe it as it has to be like an earned approach because
It requires a lot of attention. It requires a lot of input and resources. So it's basically for a one-to-one, you're learning what that account is, what is important to them as an account and how that trickles down. So what is the C-suite or what is the board saying at that account that's going to trickle down into the department that you're selling to? Like, how's that going to affect operations, customers, P &L, growth, anything that you can kind of tie your solution to?
And this type of approach again is for those bigger level accounts that we know are more, we've identified as part of our RCP, but we also know that they are more aligned with us. They have a strategic priority we can speak to and play a role in and just getting more and more relevant to them. So if you're targeting a bank, for instance, cause I have an example about this that I might get to later.
You want to tell the bank story, not a financial services story that has X amount of revenue, X amount of employees and customers, and X amount of locations. You want to tell that particular named bank account story. What's going on there? What are their initiatives for the next 12 to 18 months? What are they investing in? So are they more likely to be going into that digital transformation? Have they already done it? Where are they as an account?
And again, this approach is very labor intensive, but it reaps the benefits if it's one of those bigger deals. So this might not be, this approach I'm saying is not for every organization, but there are aspects of it that you can use it if you're selling a $25,000 solution or a hundred or multimillion dollar solution, hundred thousand.
KK Anderson (12:00.571)
Okay, so question. So when we think about enterprise accounts, we've got a lot of personas, a lot of different stakeholders that cross-functionally we may need to be selling to. So if you're doing that one-to-one approach, let's take your bank, for example, is there a number of stakeholders that you would market to? How do you adapt messaging and content based on your outreach strategy?
Kristina Jaramillo (12:31.278)
Well, when you redefine your ICP, so like if you're moving from a selling to mid market to enterprise, chances are your personas either change and if they don't change, it definitely expand. So I like to have at least three to five people engage and personas are going to change from even organization because we all know that everyone has different titles or different roles they play in every organization. So I would like to have a couple of people engage from influencer to if we can identify a decision maker or even a blocker or a challenger we can identify.
KK Anderson (12:48.741)
Yeah.
Kristina Jaramillo (13:01.08)
But we need to figure out what they typically look like and then the content that would be relevant to them. So if you're selling a solution, like a sales and marketing tech into an enterprise selling team, the AE is not going to have the same priorities as the CRO. So we want to make sure we're speaking to all those decision makers and all those influencers and speaking what's important to them, but what's important to them as a team. like the CRO is obviously going to care about things that are more tied to.
the business as a whole, team as a whole, whereas the AE might not, or even a director of sales might not. So we got to make sure that we're talking to their particular, like what's going to make them successful and how is your solution going to help them be better at their job? And also how is your solution better than competitors you've identified? Like where are the gaps and impacts in those competitors and where do you fit in better? Or how do you see those competitor gaps are going to impact?
the team and also, you know, in various ways, not just very in a revenue based way. And we need to make sure that we're speaking to that so that the team can make a decision and not get stuck in that indecision kind of like, it's a pain, but it's not a big enough pain for me. That means you haven't made that relevant connection. they could acknowledge it, but don't move forward.
KK Anderson (14:26.139)
Okay. And so that messaging, especially in that one-to-one approach, has got to be customized by person, super labor intensive. So what about in a one-to-few approach or a one-to-many approach? Because I would imagine that your campaigns kind of encompass all three levels. Is that right? So how do you, do you have to do hyper segmentation or something of your ICP?
Kristina Jaramillo (14:49.911)
Yeah, I mean,
Kristina Jaramillo (14:55.06)
Yes. And you also have to see if like an account, if it becomes more engaged, once they've entered the pipeline through maybe a one through too many campaign, if they become more engaged and you know that they have the potential to be a bigger value deal and there's more than maybe one person engaged and they've got attended webinars, they've downloaded assets, they maybe even replied to something and they have that potential to be a lucrative deal. That's how you can get them up to that one-to-one and whatever you're
like the content you're creating, the strategy and messaging you're creating for that particular one-to-one can be used to reengage similar accounts again in the one-to-many and one-to-few programs. So it's not a matter of all of the stuff that I'm talking about or all the strategy I'm talking about is just like for that one account. It can be used to kind of start that process all over again. And then once an account becomes like it hits a threshold of engagement and relevance and all it fits all these criteria's.
KK Anderson (15:51.483)
Mm-hmm.
Kristina Jaramillo (15:53.89)
then you can be know that's when it's time to really dive in. And it has to, there has to be so many signals from not just intense signals when I say signals before you develop that, because again, it's labor intensive and you don't want to waste time on something you know is or you can tell that's not going to move forward.
KK Anderson (15:57.691)
to really dive in.
KK Anderson (16:15.141)
So just curious, would you, let's say the signals are hitting and you decide to pull them out of a one to few campaign and upgrade them to a one to one, are you gonna engage in AE at that point or are you still with the BDR?
Kristina Jaramillo (16:30.798)
it depends on how much the BDRA might've already engaged with them. If they've already engaged, then we'd continue with them, but most likely because they're the bigger deals. They usually go to higher level salespeople and more experienced or they might, might be a team kind of thing because it, depending on how many insights there are from, who's engaged with them in their journey.
KK Anderson (16:43.237)
Mm-hmm.
KK Anderson (16:53.211)
Okay, let's move on to the next topic, which is fixing flawed ABM programs. This is one of my favorite conversations because it just seems like every single day, know, do you remember the book, Who Moved My Cheese? I'm dating myself right now, but.
Kristina Jaramillo (17:04.867)
Me too.
Kristina Jaramillo (17:10.77)
Yes. I remember seeing that title. No, you're not because I remember actually, well, I remember seeing it and my dad brought it home when I was like in college and was like, this is a weird title for a business book. And then he explained it to me. was like,
KK Anderson (17:23.267)
It's so good and I feel like our cheese is moving every day in sales and marketing, go to market strategy world. So, you you've worked with companies who've invested in all kinds of platforms like a sixth sense or demand base and different intent platforms and they're not seeing ROI. Like what's usually missing?
Kristina Jaramillo (17:48.024)
So it's interesting, I've talked to dozens of companies that are using these type of platforms or have used them in the past. And there's a handful that are always the same players that are coming in. One is it that they've relied on the ICP proxies within the platform, which again is not the ICP, it's at total relevant market. So it's too broad, it's not focused enough. Another one that's really...
a key player in having this not be as successful is there's a lack of change management. So if you have the wrong email, social live, even digital interactions and deliver those wrong account experiences, you're not going to convert it in market opportunity to revenue no matter how much intent the account shows. But a lot of people do that. And I've seen that there's churn rate issues or churn issues at these companies because they're not giving
A lot of the teams at these organizations aren't giving their customers the advice to be ready before they purchase this solution. And these are hefty investments. They're not cheap. And then these accounts are not converting. They're letting the tech drive the strategy versus having the tech support the strategy. So that is a big problem. And they just didn't do that readiness before they even adopted the platform to see if they were even in the right frame of mind to identify
you know, where the reds were in the business. Are they having a churn rate? Are they having a pipeline issue? Are they having an issue with accounts going dark or whatever disengaging? Another issue that I see with these platforms is that people are getting limited account insights. So the platform can identify the accounts, you know, that you might want to engage in. There's no guidance to what the intent was, why it was there in the first place.
what was the reason for it. So they don't understand necessarily the context behind the intent and why, you know, what's going on. There's no real direction to engage those accounts. Instead of telling an account story, we're going back to those persona and industry stories, just like your competitors. So we're all reacting the same way to the intent. So then if an account becomes unresponsive or goes dark, we kind of figure we're left wondering why and it's because we didn't
Kristina Jaramillo (20:12.056)
do the due diligence. Obviously you can't do that with every account, but the biggest, another big issue that I see is that a lot of teams aren't providing the account-based enablement to bridge the intent that's coming in to have, so no sales knows what to do with it. I've seen a lot of marketers telling me that, you know, we have six cents, we love it, but marketing or sales hates it. And it's because sales teams aren't equipped with the insights or the enablement to continue that conversation that marketing has started or engaged.
So they're being just again, going back to that handoff and there's no tools or messaging or stories so that sales can become multi-threaded. They don't have specific business cases to talk about. They don't have the tools to create that consensus and overcome that indecisiveness and move accounts to revenue. So there is that problem where one team might really like it and then the other team doesn't. It's because they're not equipping the team to maximize the platform and the results from it.
KK Anderson (21:11.003)
And then I imagine what happens is the unequipped seller probably then gets on the phone and just starts feature jumping. Let me demo, let me talk about our product, here's what we do, here's the problems we solve. And they may get some nodding heads and some, that's cool, but they're definitely not building the urgency.
Kristina Jaramillo (21:25.742)
Yeah.
Kristina Jaramillo (21:32.236)
Yeah. And so all that hard work that marketing did sales kind of backpedaled for them, but not because they want, you know, they wanted to, it's because they didn't have the resources and they didn't know what to do next. So they had an account that maybe was a little warmer and that they had been equipped with this insights or this knowledge up. They would have been able to address the conversation completely differently.
KK Anderson (21:55.205)
So do you have a preference for what type of platform or program that you recommend for these kinds of things? is that intent signal, mean, is that cheese moving as well, should I say? Like is that still as effective as it used to be?
Kristina Jaramillo (22:17.868)
don't think so only because so many people have it now. Before when it was like new and you were the only one or a handful of people that had it, it was one thing. But I know more platforms are telling you who the actual person is with the intent, but just telling me that a company, like if you give me that there's intent at Microsoft, doesn't mean what am I, how am I going to handle that one? There are some that are getting down to the person itself, which is very scary to me, but it's
KK Anderson (22:35.003)
Yeah, that's impossible.
Kristina Jaramillo (22:46.442)
It's more to me that it's become targeted to man gen. So you're doing demand gen, but you're doing it at a middle, more relevant, a little more targeted, but it's still a narrower spray and pray. It's useful. It's just not being used. And I don't think that a lot of companies can justify the ROI from it when it comes in terms of revenue as opposed to like, unless they're targeting or if they're
KK Anderson (22:59.675)
Mm-hmm.
Kristina Jaramillo (23:14.648)
keeping track of MQLs and MQAs and that's how they're justifying the spend. But if they actually turned and said, this particular tool in Sixth Sense or demand base led to X amount of revenue, I think it's very hard to justify the expense. We saw people that tech last or maybe like your three quarters away there and then you adopt a smaller part of the tech and then you grow from there. But if you do it first, you're going to have that tech for like six months before you've actually built what's go into it.
KK Anderson (23:28.431)
Wow, yep.
KK Anderson (23:44.365)
Or before you even know, like if you start using it and it's not working and you you've got the common pitfalls like you were just describing, you may not even know. So I've heard you say that ABM should influence revenue and not just generate MQLs. And you've talked a little bit about this already, but what are those like right metrics? Like what should...
Kristina Jaramillo (23:44.749)
So why do.
Kristina Jaramillo (23:53.142)
It's not the tool. Yeah, it's not the tool. It's the way it's being used.
KK Anderson (24:12.749)
marketers be looking at not just for ABM success, in general.
Kristina Jaramillo (24:17.506)
Yeah, so NRR is your ultimate metric. We want to look across that buyer's journey and customer lifecycle and impact stage progression, win rates, deal sizes, ARR, GRR, again, ultimately that NRR. So we are marketers in our organization, in our firm, but we really are focused on revenue as well. So we're assessing that go-to market. We want to look for what's happening. Where are we losing? Why are we losing?
We want to see if we're getting that VP and C suite engagement, because if not, then we need to build metrics around that. why not? Are we getting engagement across the organization or is it just the one department? And put metrics around that. It might not be relevant to your whatever you're selling, but a lot of times it is. are we looking at the lagging revenue indicators like stage progression, win rates, deal sizes?
and AR, GR, and NR and putting measurements around those to see where that business problem lies. So when we engage as a forum with people, we want to look at the biggest red in the business and address that first and develop the strategy from there and then move on to develop or to develop strategies for other areas that are revenue leaks.
KK Anderson (25:31.579)
So, kind of spilling into the topic of what's not working anymore in B2B marketing, I'm curious, how have your different channels shifted? Are you less on email, more on other channels? What are those kind of, how are you building up your intent signals?
Kristina Jaramillo (25:57.945)
From our firm, I'd say we're more on LinkedIn than we are on email. I'm seeing a lot for our customers as well because you can engage with your buyers in a different way. You can see what's important to them. What are they talking about? Why are they talking about these things? What is, and I'm not saying like personal, like they went to Penn State. I'm talking like, what are they doing in their role and how is it?
KK Anderson (26:01.859)
Okay, tell me about that.
KK Anderson (26:23.269)
Yeah.
Kristina Jaramillo (26:24.736)
How is the market impacted? How are the tools they might using be impacted? What they're doing and how they're achieving them. So you can do a lot of homework before reaching out to someone and knowing a little bit more about them before you send them that LinkedIn message or an email message, or you decide to call them however you're outreaching to them. And I think the same thing is happening for our clients is that they're using and market in general, that they're using LinkedIn, they're using these other tools and other platforms to see what's going on with that individual first.
So they can get relevant beyond you live in Phoenix or you went to XYZ University or you're working in this industry. I wanna get more insights the better and LinkedIn is one of those platforms that is like a plethora of information. And you could even see what the person might be writing on about or commenting on or things like that. So you get an insight into how they work and how their team might work.
KK Anderson (27:18.843)
How do you do that at scale?
Kristina Jaramillo (27:22.06)
That at scale can be hard, but BDRs can definitely like say if BDRs are working on your one to many or one to few, they can use Navigator. They can use regular LinkedIn subscriptions and do a little bit of homework before. And again, digging deeper, like they have to be told and taught to dig deeper than those generic similarities. What might be bad? What's influencing them on their day to day and how can what you're selling or
KK Anderson (27:43.226)
Right.
Kristina Jaramillo (27:50.094)
How can your solutions or your platform, how can it help them be more successful? And you got to position it that way versus, you know, I know that you're in this industry and we've seen a lot of people in this industry have this problem.
KK Anderson (28:02.607)
Right, it's almost the exact same thing you were just saying with the one-to-one in an enterprise account. Like it's not good enough to have just that market story. You have to have the account story.
Kristina Jaramillo (28:14.7)
the account story. Yeah, I mean, when's the last time anyone closed a six or seven figure deal with just sending generic thought leadership or industry leadership? I mean, it might, but yeah.
KK Anderson (28:22.147)
Yeah, it's probably been a long time. So it's a LinkedIn connection and then a LinkedIn message is another way that you're doing it. What else? Are there any other like intent channels that you've been seeing that work in getting engagement with enterprise just primarily? I mean, are you using email still?
Kristina Jaramillo (28:44.302)
Kristina Jaramillo (28:49.272)
I am, but it's very like compared to what it was. I do LinkedIn first. If I get engagement versus like say I reach out to someone that I know would be a great fit because we have a business case, we have a case study, we know what's going on strategically. We did all our homework. They engage with me by connecting because I'm sending them a relevant message. And then I send them, I might send them up a couple of weeks later, another follow up message to.
KK Anderson (28:52.667)
Tell me about that.
Kristina Jaramillo (29:15.362)
read a certain article and they don't engage with that because the LinkedIn inbox can sometimes be a black hole. Things just get lost in there. Then I might try to find their actual email address and try to reach out to them that way. And then maybe send one or two followups to nurture them that way. email is always like my last resort only because it's not, I feel like it's intrusive, number one, like you're getting to the person's inbox that they basically live in.
and you haven't necessarily earned the right to get there. And I don't want them to think that I'm just another person selling something. Like I have to, if I'm outreach with them, I'm, there's a reason. So there's a reason is I have information to share that's relevant and I have content to share. I'm not just saying, let's jump on a call because I know that I get dozens of those a day and I ignore all of them. So it's definitely happening at the enterprise level. So I always say people, if you're going to...
reach out to someone, whether that's on LinkedIn, whether that's email, however you decide to engage with them, there has to be a reason. Like it's not just that you want to sell them. That's not the reason. It's because I know that XYZ is happening at your company and this article will explain how to address it or how to be proactive so it doesn't happen to you as well. So you're giving them value and it goes back to value selling. And that has to be something that marketers, like I think that's a lot of a big problem with this is that a lot of marketers are not.
educated in the ways of selling. And that's why there's such a disconnect because they just think of marketing in those very brand awareness type terms as opposed to, well, what's going to move that revenue needle forward? Like does a salesperson, would they care about the features and benefit article to share to their, their prospects? Most likely not. Cause it's not as successful for them. So I think when you're in the sales,
Like you put on a sales hat or you walk in their shoes or you listen to a sales call, you understand them so much better and you can write for them better. You can produce content and produce assets for them so much better when you know where they're coming from and you speak their language.
KK Anderson (31:20.987)
Yeah, I was just about to say you're speaking my love language.
Kristina Jaramillo (31:26.446)
You have to, if you want them to be successful and you want them to work with you in a consistent basis, you have to speak their love language, which is revenue. Like it's not.
KK Anderson (31:35.301)
Right, right, exactly. But as a sales leader and sales coach myself for decades now, I find myself saying probably on a daily basis, like it's serve over sell. And I don't care if you're selling a metal valve or you're selling a seven figure SaaS product, right? It does not matter.
If you want to differentiate in today's market, you must serve over sell. If you're not helping them solve a business problem, if you're not consulting with them on how to advance their career, what's in it for them, you're not going to get anywhere. Right? And so it is, how can you help them?
Kristina Jaramillo (32:26.882)
Yeah, how do you want to be perceived too? Do you want to be perceived as a partner or a vendor? And marketing has to think about that too. And I think that's the best.
KK Anderson (32:29.787)
That's right. You want to be a And it's almost like, how can you get them to say thank you? Like, wow, that was nice. Right? And so when you're coming into their inbox, you you want to do that. That makes it a lot more tricky. I'm curious to get your take on cold calling and having BDRs pick up the phone and call people. I, you know, obviously you want to do that with a serve.
Kristina Jaramillo (32:39.937)
Mm-hmm.
KK Anderson (32:58.051)
over sell mentality as well. But talk to me about, I know we're going a little bit off track here, but how you combine your call with your LinkedIn, with your email and your approach to really try to deliver some value.
Kristina Jaramillo (33:15.648)
Yeah, so I am the last person you want to talk to about cold calling. But if you were to have, like say you have a set number of accounts or whatever and you're trying to outreach to them, again, are you calling to hit your number of calls for that day or are you calling to actually engage with someone? So I am always quality over quantity. And again, if you're not teaching, even in that, even if you're doing a cold call, if you're not trying to teach them or say, you know, page three of this, you know, executive
brief that's 50 pages and really long is really where you should focus. You might not need to read the whole thing, but definitely page three you need to focus on because it's got X, Y, and Z in it is way more beneficial and interesting to me than saying, here's a 50 page report. Get to like, good luck. Add that to your list of reading for the day, evening. And it's, it's, it tells them that you read it too. And you know about it and you're more in a
KK Anderson (33:59.695)
Yeah!
Kristina Jaramillo (34:14.146)
well-read on their industry and what's going on with them. And then you even took the time to pinpoint something that they should care about and why. Totally different conversation than saying, you know, here my product and feature dump and this is why we're better than XYZ competitor.
KK Anderson (34:25.807)
Right. You have to earn the right to be able to talk about yourself. Right? Yeah.
Kristina Jaramillo (34:31.326)
Absolutely. Yep. A lot of sellers know this, but marketing needs to get on board too.
KK Anderson (34:36.091)
That's true. So, okay, so if you're, you know, for the CMOs out there in the audience that are listening right now and, you know, kind of steering back to the ABM concept of this one-to-one, then one-to-few and one-to-many, you know, marketing, like what should they be thinking about when starting and executing an ABM program to go up market to enterprises?
Kristina Jaramillo (35:07.64)
So right now I would really focus on building the right foundation to change those interactions that the teams are delivering and how the experiences are being delivered, how the account experience is being delivered versus what I see a lot of people doing and then have their ABM program fail and then wonder why. Is there retrofitting ABM on top of what they're already doing and just using it to source the pipeline?
And ABM can be used to sort the pipeline, but it's not as effective as it is to actually driving change with the accounts, moving those accounts forward and driving revenue. So I have an example of this. I recently spoke to head of marketing and an AP and automation FBA FPNA tech. So they wanted to see how they could fix their ABM program. They had started it eight months ago, so it was relatively new.
What they really needed to do is recalibrate what they were doing. Their frameworks needed to change, their processes, their metrics. They had done this retrofitting of what they were already doing and they were not seeing the ABM returns and the time and investment. So we noticed it was that they were putting ABM just on new logo acquisition, which you can, but it's much more difficult to do versus reviewing that go-to market like we've been talking about.
and they were also defining their ICP with generic things. So a generic trait. So for them, it was like how many transactions they had, you know, what did their, you know, platform look like? What did their ERP environment look like? They were not segmenting their existing customers to see where they had the greatest long-term revenue with those kinds of customers. And then looking at them.
to see how they could get similar characteristics beyond those demographics and technographics so they could better define their ICP. They hadn't redefined it or readdressed their ICP. So these are things that people really need to do before they develop an ABM program in order to make sure that it's successful. Otherwise, you're looking at maybe six months, maybe less before you're like, it's not working. We're gonna leave it.
KK Anderson (37:23.137)
You said something that I want to, I want you to double click on for me, Christina. You said maybe they're using it on net new acquisition versus their install base is what I'm, what I'm assuming. Tell me more about.
Kristina Jaramillo (37:37.612)
So for us, what we've seen the most success and what I've seen other people even say this is that ABM really has success, greater success on retention expansion than it does on net new. Because to me, net new, a lot of it has to do with demand. So if we are, we know there's a dozen accounts that are up for renewal and we need to know this ahead of time, not 30 days before renewal.
KK Anderson (38:04.987)
You
Kristina Jaramillo (38:07.118)
because you can't throw together a strategy that quick. They're renewing and they have a potential to expand because they've been using us on a weekly or monthly basis versus an account that's only been using us on a quarterly or annual basis. Then we need to know what we need to do to address the stay, why stay, why now conversation and why expand. Like this is what you look like when you came to us, this is what's happened since you've worked with us and this is where we see opportunities in the next...
know, six months to a year, however your contracts are situated, areas for growth. So you're again, going back to that, seeing as being seen as a partner to grow their business, as opposed to just a vendor of a solution. And you can expand that account, maybe either they can have different features or different solutions that you offer, they can add on to what they're already buying, or maybe they have business units that you need to break into and they can help you kind of break those walls down. So it's all a matter of
trying to get these accounts to grow and stay with you, then land and expand. It's doable on land, excuse me, land that new. It's just a longer road. And I think people don't think of it and they think, ABM will just fix all my problems and we'll land that new within 30 days.
KK Anderson (39:07.739)
Come on.
KK Anderson (39:21.881)
Yeah, and why is it that it takes longer with the NetNew?
Kristina Jaramillo (39:27.626)
It's similar to the fact that you need to do all your homework on an account that's net new versus if they're a customer, you have most of that done for you already. Usually what's harder enterprise-wise, same thing with ABM like normal sellers have.
KK Anderson (39:31.493)
Yeah.
Yep, got it, okay.
KK Anderson (39:43.323)
Okay, well that is some great advice for our CMOs listening. Let's shift over to, I'm having so much fun talking, I'm losing track of time. Let's shift over to, and we've talked a little bit about this, but that marketing to sales handshake, right? Really closing the gap between the two. What does that look like in practice?
Some may say you get an MQL, you hand it over to sales and then they're off. You've talked a little bit about this, but how do we really make that overlap?
Kristina Jaramillo (40:24.558)
So basically means you're not just working accounts to pipeline on the marketing side and giving sales that intent, the engagement, and then sitting back and waiting for them to tell you what they think they might need or what they need based on that selling cycle. You're proactively working to influence the selling conversation on the marketing side. As a marketer, I'm providing account insights that sales need to have that right engagement. We're providing them with content to support them, to help them reframe conversations content to...
support them once, you know, if they've celebrated through the selling cycle and now it's just internal conversations, what kind of content am I, supporting them with so that they can be, have these conversations internally and, and go in our favor. Are we providing with stories on the reframes they need? Want to make sure that they're also providing account based value props, conversational support.
We're helping sales enable buyers to make that trade off between what they're doing now and working with you, justify the business case and have that confidence to make a decision that's going to drive change. Cause obviously change is very scary. It can be expensive. It can be timely. We're helping sales overcome those issues with these prospects and bring those different buyers together. And we're helping sales address those struggles that they're dealing with within particular.
So we've already either they've seen them before so we know how to enable them or there's something new and we need to learn how to enable them. So we're thinking of working alongside sales and account teams until it's revenue or there's greater revenue growth. It's all about making marketing accountable for revenue just like making sales teams accountable. It's obviously not going to be the same numbers and the same metrics and things like that, but all teams should really be accountable because an account based approach
really should be joint sales and marketing and a CS win. I know it's account-based marketing, but I like to say account-based go-to market instead because it makes everybody accountable as opposed to just one team. it's, especially in this day and age, it's very hard for just sales to do everything alone. It's virtually impossible.
KK Anderson (42:29.167)
No.
KK Anderson (42:39.887)
Right, that's really interesting. I like that account-based go-to-market. Yeah. So how often are you recommending that sellers should be meeting with their marketing team?
Kristina Jaramillo (42:58.522)
so depending on how you're structured, say someone who's the, the ideal idea would be that there's a marketer aligned with segments of the sales team. And I would say like ideally weekly, but if not at least monthly, so we can see like, where are these deals stuck? Are they progressing? Do you need additional support? Do we need to have, do we need to create a webinar content or a case study based on what you're having a problem you're having? Because we've seen it two, three, four times already.
So obviously this is something we need to address as a company or as a team. So you can check in because if you're just kicking them over the fence and just hoping something happens and then waiting to the end of the quarter to see what's going on, it's too late. It's really too late.
KK Anderson (43:39.183)
Right. That is such a great point. That is such a great point. Okay. So let's see. When you think about, you know, just last week, I don't know when it dropped on our podcast schedule, but I think it was last week, we had an interview with Cathy Minter, who she used to be a co-host of Selling the Cloud, and she was our guest last week. And she talked a lot about a unified CRO model where
marketing, sales, customer success, a lot of what you just said. Like it's interesting how all of these conversations are all happening at the same time. Like it's so important that everyone is unified under one kind of leadership. And so, you know, I know this is kind of putting you on the spot, but like what's your perspective on that? So if you have one, let's say your chief revenue officer and you've got marketing, you've got everyone in the revenue organization is kind of reporting up. Like what's your perspective on
or do you feel like they should all be separate?
Kristina Jaramillo (44:40.782)
So if you have a CRO and everyone's reporting the CRO and not necessarily a CMO, that automatically means that you should be focused on revenue. But ideally, I like it so that the BDRs are under marketing. Because then it's almost like marketing gets to train them on what they need to ask for to support. And then we can know how the higher level business development or sales team needs, what they're going to need.
KK Anderson (44:55.855)
Okay.
Kristina Jaramillo (45:09.274)
In a perfect world to me, there would be a CRO and a CMO and they're in lockstep about how they're going to hit the revenue goals together. And they're constantly meeting because then that trickles down to their respective teams of how we're going to work together. Because if you see them align, then it's much easier for the teams to come together. But if they're not working together to hit these revenue goals, that's where that misalignment happens. That's where I'm going to give you MQLs and then hope for the best at the end of the quarter, of the year.
KK Anderson (45:21.871)
Mm-hmm.
KK Anderson (45:35.794)
huh.
Kristina Jaramillo (45:37.454)
So I think it's all a matter of that changement internally, change management.
KK Anderson (45:40.997)
So any kind of stories or experiences that you've had where either there's been a really strong handshake or where there's been a gap and that alignment story is so interesting to me because I feel like that is an obvious gap for so many people that are listening. For one, just to say like a CMO typically has real data. They've got numbers, they've got all kinds of data that they're looking at.
And a CRO, unless they're using like a platform like Collective Eye or something, they don't. have, well, don't, know, our seller says this deal is going to get pushed because of this or that, or, know, it's all, you know, it's all speculation and opinion. so, you know, that causes a lot of consternation a lot of times between CMOs and CROs and to their CEO, right? So just anything comes to mind as far as, you know,
Kristina Jaramillo (46:22.286)
So big, right.
KK Anderson (46:40.805)
clients that have done this really well or...
Kristina Jaramillo (46:45.962)
Yeah, it's, it's when there is like, if we go into an organization and the sales and marketing leaders are not on the same page or we don't have access to one or another, we already know that our success rate is going down. we've worked with organizations where they will keep us completely siloed from sales. So we've developed great content. They've been engaged, they've engaged with it in campaigns, but we don't know what's happening after that because they are so siloed internally that
we cannot get past them. So those clients don't wind up being a great fit for us because we want to make sure that we're impacting revenue and there's no way for us to know we are. Like they've engaged with content from us, but we don't know what happens after that. So it's very hard when there's not both. ideally for us, we come in where there's alignment or we come in and we work directly with the selling team and we're working with the VP, senior VP of sales or the CRO because we're creating that
strategy and content and messaging for the selling conversations that he knows his team's already having, but they just can't get that level of attention from marketing because they were either not on the same page when it comes to that, because they're more brand awareness and they're more metrics on campaigns. Don't have the manpower because it is like, as we've been talking about, what we do is very time consuming. But if you can, if this, let's say
program I'm running, takes me three months and I close a six figure deal, then it's worth it. Because then we can try to replicate that or we can try to influence the smaller deals. And then we can give a lot of this information to marketing so that they can optimize the programs they're running. So it's, it's very hard if there isn't that change management. And I've heard, I've talked to a lot of people that are in marketing that they want to do all these great things, but there is no senior leadership alignment, but they want the results. The senior leadership wants the result, but there isn't that alignment.
And they say they're aligned, they're not really, in theory they are, but not, they're not orchestrating and moving as one team. So like an ideal role, the CRO and a CMO would be best friends.
KK Anderson (48:53.467)
Yep, 100%. Okay, so let's move on to, excuse me, rapid fire questions. This is my favorite part of every episode. And Christina, what we like to do is just ask some quick questions and you can give us your knee jerk reaction. Okay, what was, well, let me see, every good marketer has to have sold something at some point. What was the first product or service you ever sold?
Kristina Jaramillo (49:11.864)
Got it.
Kristina Jaramillo (49:23.086)
So if we wanna go back to like the original original, I would say Girl Scout Cookies.
KK Anderson (49:26.427)
There you go. Door to door.
Kristina Jaramillo (49:28.694)
Yeah, but then after, yeah, well then after that, yeah, well actually I even my dad, I even got my dad in on it. He would bring in, this was back when they actually had paper forms and you put your name and like checked how many you wanted, like a thinment. He would bring the form in to work and we lived in New Jersey, but he worked in New York. So he would take the train, bring the form in, he'd come back and he'd sell like hundred cookies or boxes. And then he'd have to come in for like three or four days, a couple of weeks later with duffel bags.
Anything for like a reward.
KK Anderson (49:58.659)
So you are delegating very early. You were an entrepreneur even then.
Kristina Jaramillo (50:04.558)
It helps that my dad and I are very close.
KK Anderson (50:06.797)
I love that. Okay, who's your favorite CMO or go-to-market strategist to follow?
Kristina Jaramillo (50:14.742)
Yeah, so he was a CMO, believe he was. Yeah, he was CMO, but he's a go-to market strategist now Sangram Vahri at go-to market partners. He's one of my favorite because he tells it like it is and it's no sugar coating it. And he's telling you, you don't have a sales problem, you don't have a marketing problem, you don't have a customer success problem, you have a go-to market problem. And a lot of the content that he and his team shares is very relevant. So if you're not following him, I suggest it.
KK Anderson (50:38.651)
That's really great. then, I should say, Christina, you and your partner produce some amazing content as well.
Kristina Jaramillo (50:45.826)
thank you. We're very busy.
KK Anderson (50:46.795)
Yes, some amazing content. So definitely go follow their newsletter and then you also have a podcast.
Kristina Jaramillo (50:55.478)
I do, we do have a podcast. You're going to be on it, I believe next week.
KK Anderson (50:58.048)
Yes. And tell us what's the, tell us about the podcast and where they can find it.
Kristina Jaramillo (51:03.34)
Yeah, it's on every platform wherever you listen to. I just happen to be a Spotify person, but it's called the ABM Done Right. And we talk to people who have both sides of the fence. So sales and marketing leaders that are typically in the tech and SaaS industry, and they're selling complex solutions. So they know all the things that we've been talking about. And they really just want to optimize their programs. And they're telling you lessons learned, what works, what's not working.
why they recommend certain platforms and certain strategies and people will tell you like the honest answer of, know, we adopted ABM before we ready or we, you know, adopted ABM and then ran it for three months and didn't give it a chance. And so that we have to start again. So it's, it's, I learned a lot and it's a, I nerd out a lot with people that I don't necessarily get to talk to otherwise. So it's, it's something fun.
KK Anderson (51:51.555)
Yeah. Okay, so what is a leadership or go to market practice that you think every sales or marketing leadership adopt?
Kristina Jaramillo (52:01.986)
So I think a lot of people need to focus on their why. Why are we running this campaign? Why are we reaching out to this company? And if you can't figure out the why, then maybe you need to go back to the drawing board. Or why am I picking up this phone or sending this email? Because I think a lot of people are just focused on the tasks they need to do, that they get stuck so much in the weeds of the tasks that they forget the strategic part and the strategic reason we do all these things.
KK Anderson (52:30.235)
Start with Y. Start with Y. Okay, advice you'd give your 21 year old self.
Kristina Jaramillo (52:37.07)
Um, let's see advice to give my 21 year old self would definitely be to travel more. I definitely traveled more in my twenties, but I should have traveled even more internationally. And I would say if you have a passion that you want to follow, that's the time to do it. I mean, you can do it in your forties and fifties and sixties and beyond. It's just harder. So if I had, if you had something that we're passionate about at that time, other than traveling, that was what I was passionate about. It probably would have gone down a different road.
KK Anderson (52:55.483)
So much fun.
KK Anderson (53:02.987)
Yeah, really, really great advice. I have a 20-something year old niece, two of them nieces, they're both in Italy right now and I'm thinking to myself, God, I haven't been there since I was in my 20s.
Kristina Jaramillo (53:15.382)
same feeling I love it on.
KK Anderson (53:17.499)
Okay, last one. What's your favorite business book? What would you recommend to your readers for, to our audience for a good read?
Kristina Jaramillo (53:26.38)
So I know you said business book, I'm a really big, I'm a nerd because we always focus on the go-to market. I'm reading a lot of only sales marketing based or go to meet, go to market books. So my top two, would say would be the challenger sale, which people I should, if you haven't heard about it, Google and look it up. And my favorite, there's a couple of different challenger ones, but the challenger customer, cause you kind of get inside the head of what the customer is thinking and then it can makes you a better marketer.
And it sounds like it would be more of a seller's book, but it totally is for both sides of the team.
KK Anderson (54:01.614)
the challenger customer.
Kristina Jaramillo (54:03.936)
and the jilt effect that's written by some of the authors from... Yeah, it's a good one.
KK Anderson (54:05.657)
yes, I've read that one. Yeah, that is an awesome book. Okay, awesome. Well, Christina, thank you so much for joining us today. And we will include all of your recommendations in the show notes and then also your LinkedIn profile and a link to your podcast as well. Yeah, it was a lot of fun. Okay, talk soon.
Kristina Jaramillo (54:21.666)
Thank you so much. really appreciate it.
Kristina Jaramillo (54:31.79)
All right.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.