Open with me to John’s Gospel and chapter 21. John 21, reading from verse 15. When they had finished eating, Jesus said to Simon Peter, Simon, son of John, do you love me more than these? Yes, Lord, he said, you know that I love you.
Jesus said, feed my lambs. Again, Jesus said, Simon, son of John, do you love me? He answered, yes, Lord, you know that I love you. Jesus said, take care of my sheep.
The third time he said to him, Simon, son of John, do you love me? Peter was hurt because Jesus asked him the third time, do you love me? He said, Lord, you know all things, you know that I love you. Jesus said, feed my sheep. Very truly, I tell you, when you were younger, you dressed yourself and went where you wanted.
But when you are old, you will stretch out your hands and someone else will dress you and lead you where you do not want to go. Jesus said this to indicate the kind of death by which Peter would glorify God. Then he said to him, follow me.
Peter turned and saw that the disciple whom Jesus loved was following them. This was the one who would lean back against Jesus at the supper and had said, Lord, who is going to betray you? When Peter saw him, he asked, Lord, what about him? Jesus answered, if I want him to remain alive until I return, what is that to you? You must follow me. Because of this, the rumour spread among the believers that this disciple would not die.
But Jesus did not say that he would not die. He only said, if I want him to remain alive until I return, what is that to you? This is the disciple who testifies to these things and who wrote them down. We know that his testimony is true.
Jesus did many other things as well. If every one of them were written down, I suppose that even the whole world would not have room for the books that would be written. This is God’s word.
I don’t know if any of you watch Race Around the World. It’s a, well, it’s just what it sounds like. So it’s a race where pairs of people travel around countries and continents in a dash towards a finish line.
And usually the finish line is something quite dramatic and spectacular. It might be something like a hillside with a really spectacular view. They always make the ending a high point to finish on.
Well, here we are in John’s gospel. We’ve come to the end. I don’t think we’ve been racing through it.
I would say we’ve been going fairly slowly over these 16 months. But we’ve certainly been travelling through these 21 chapters of John. And we’ve come an awfully long way in this time.
We started with a magnificent opening, a disclosure of who Jesus is. And John, he’s been our travel companion. John has then guided us through many miracles and teaching and all sorts of incidents.
He’s even guided us past a cruel cross and an empty tomb. And now finally, we come to the finish line of John. And where does it finish? How does it finish? It finishes on a beach with a breakfast.
It finishes with a few disciples then walking up the beach with Jesus. It doesn’t look like a spectacular ending, does it? Not to a gospel that started with a cosmic opening. And yet, if we take the time to examine it more closely, we will see that it’s the absolutely perfect ending to this gospel.
It sums up the message of John and it shows us where things should go from here. And it’s full of deep challenge and it’s full of enormous encouragement. Whether you are a longtime follower of Jesus, whether you’ve been stumbling along and you feel as if you’ve been failing and like Peter, you’ve been messing it up.
Or whether you’re someone who’s just started the journey or even considering starting it, there’s something here this morning for you. So from this passage, there’s going to be three facts about Jesus that can encourage us. And incidentally, this is a bad sermon insofar as it’s going to have a huge first point.
It’s going to have a pretty small second point, and it’s going to have a tiny third point, but it’s just the way I want to do it. So number one, Jesus is gracious. He restores the failure.
We’re beside the Sea of Galilee. It’s a matter of weeks since Jesus has risen from the dead. Jesus has appeared on the shore.
The disciples had been fishing, and a miraculous catch has then been followed by a breakfast. A breakfast cooked and served by Jesus. And all of this is happening, verse 9, beside a fire of burning coals.
In other translations, you might have it rendering it a charcoal fire. And that detail is almost certainly significant, because there’s only one other place in John’s gospel, one other place where a charcoal fire is mentioned, and that is in chapter 18, when Peter was standing beside a charcoal fire. Jesus was on trial, you remember, in the house.
He’s on trial for his life. Peter is standing outside. He’s warming his hands at a fire.
And it was there that for the third time, he denied that he knew Jesus. Peter disassociated himself from Jesus beside a fire. It’s impossible not to think that this would have entered Peter’s mind as he sits and eats his fish with Jesus across the fire.
And it’s certainly on Jesus’ mind. Jesus is going to have this awkward conversation with Peter. And he’s going to have it publicly.
The they of verse 15, when they had finished eating, is a plural they, which implies that the six other disciples, remember there’s seven of them, are still hanging around when Jesus begins this conversation. Back in chapter 13, Peter had boasted publicly before these disciples that he would die for Jesus. The Peter who had publicly boasted is now publicly confronted.
And it sounds a little ominous to begin with, when Jesus singles him out and calls him Simon, son of John. You might remember that Jesus had renamed Simon, son of John as Peter, which means rock. And so he was often called Peter or in the gospel sometimes Simon Peter.
But here, Peter is dropped because Peter hasn’t been acting very rock-like. And this raises the question whether Simon, son of John will be restored again. And so what follows is a series of questions.
These questions from Jesus are simple, but they are probing. Notice that Jesus doesn’t ask Peter whether he’s committed. He doesn’t ask him whether he feels sorry.
He doesn’t ask him how much truth or theology he knows. No doubt these would have been perfectly good questions. But Jesus pinpoints the cause of Peter’s failure.
It’s the same root cause of every human failure. We might say that it’s all just a simple matter of either obedience or disobedience. But the underlying cause of our disobedience is that we do not love the Lord our God with all of our heart and soul and mind and strength.
And that we also love other things more than we love God. Why had Peter denied Jesus? Because he loved his life more than he loved Jesus in that moment. He chooses his life over Jesus.
But notice that Jesus puts a particular point on this. He doesn’t just ask him whether he loves him, but do you love me more than these? I take it that Jesus is referring to the other disciples here. Do you love me more than these guys? And that makes sense if you know the rest of the gospel, because this is exactly what Peter had thought.
It wasn’t just that he thought that he would love Jesus to death, but that his love would surpass that of the other disciples who wouldn’t be willing to love him to that degree. It’s a silly sort of arrogance that we can easily fall into. When we ever think that there is something about us, something in our thinking or in our practise as a Christian, and usually we tend to focus on our strengths and ignore our weaknesses with this, but we somehow think there’s something about us that just puts us a few notches above your average ordinary Christian.
We’re a little bit above that for some reason. Peter thought he loved Jesus more, and that pride led to Peter’s fall. But notice that Peter answers humbly.
He begins, Lord, and then he answers, yes, yes, I love you. But he doesn’t say, yes, I love you more than these other fellows. He’s no longer stupid enough to say, I love you more than these.
Just a very quick aside, people sometimes use John chapter 21 as one of the passages of scripture to elevate Peter above all the other apostles and all of other Christians in history, the kind of primacy of Peter stuff. When in actual fact, the passage does the very opposite. Yes, we’ll see in a minute, Peter is given a very important role of shepherding.
But Peter comes to recognise he is not above the other disciples. That’s the whole point here of this conversation. Failure is a painful thing for each of us.
But when it leads, or if it leads to humility, it’s a good thing for us. So Peter kind of answers half the question. Do you love me more than these? Lord, you know that I love you.
And Jesus then responds, feed my lambs, which is the first hint that the failing Peter is going to become the shepherd Peter. I take it here that lambs are a picture of believers, converts, disciples, who like baby lambs need to be fed by their shepherd in order to survive. So John’s gospel, if you like the whole of John’s gospel sort of catching or bringing sheep into the fold, but if you’ve got sheep in the fold, you’ve got to feed them.
Peter’s got to take on that task of feeding them. So that sounds a little more encouraging, doesn’t it? Sounds like Jesus is on the way to restoring him. But then to Peter’s dismay, Jesus asks another question.
And it’s exactly the same question as before. Verse 16, Simon, son of John, do you love me? And Peter replies in exactly the same way. And Jesus then replies in a similar way, except this time he says, take care of my sheep, which suggests a broader set of responsibilities beyond the core task of feeding.
Feeding is going to be the main thing the shepherd does, but actually there’s other responsibilities of being a shepherd. And then verse 17, the third time Jesus said to him, Simon, son of John, do you love me? And we’re told that Peter was hurt because Jesus asked him the third time, do you love me? Now, I need to say something about a common way of reading this passage and a common way that we often hear it preached. And the interpretation says that what is really significant here is the words that Jesus uses for love.
This is hidden to us in English, you’re maybe looking down and saying, well, it’s just love, love, love, love. But in the original language that’s written in Greek, there’s actually different words for love. And there are different words, two words actually, that Peter and Jesus are using as they go back and forth here.
So one word is agape. Agape means something like selfless, sacrificial, loyal love. It’s a choosing to sacrificially love someone.
People sometimes say that it’s a divine love, or it’s a love that only God has. But actually this word is used much more broadly in the New Testament. It’s used also negatively.
For example, it said that Demas loved, and the word there is agape. He agape’d this world in such a way that he chose it as his new loyalty. And he sacrificially loved it.
So there’s that word here. And then there’s a second word that’s used, and it’s the word philio. And philio means something like brotherly love, or the love of a friend.
You know, Philadelphia, you know, the city of brotherly love. It carries over even today. And this is a crucial point.
Sometimes people will say that agape is a higher form of love. So it’s up here. And then philio, brotherly love, is a kind of lower earthly sort of love.
And so if you follow that logic, the conversation goes like this. The first time around, Jesus says to Peter, do you agape me? Do you love me with a loyal love? And Peter can’t reply that he loves Jesus with a loyal love. And so he says, Lord, I philio you.
I love you like a brother. And then the second time, Jesus says, Peter, do you agape me? And again, Peter says, not quite, Lord. I philio you.
I love you as a brother. And then the third time, something different happens in the Greek text. Jesus asked Peter, Peter, do you philio me? Do you love me with a brotherly love? It’s almost like he graciously comes down to Peter’s level and says, well, if you can’t love me this much, then maybe you’ll love me this much.
It’s really curious that the word does change here. It’s appealing. It’s very preachable, but I must say I’m a little cautious about it.
It’s not that I think that there aren’t slightly different meanings to agape and philio. They do mean slightly different things. But I don’t think it’s the case that agape is up here and philio is way down here.
In John’s gospel, God the Father is said to love the Son both with an agape love, John 3, and with a philio love, John 5. In John 5, it says the Father loves, he philios the Son with a brotherly love, and he shows him all that he does. We wouldn’t say, would we, that God the Father has a higher love for Jesus and a lesser love for Jesus, right? But he loves him in both ways. Similarly, you know the phrase we meet in John, the disciple whom Jesus loved, the disciple whom Jesus loved? Sometimes the text says the disciple he loved with agape love, and other times it says the disciple Jesus loved with brotherly love, philio love.
Jesus loved him with both sorts of love. He was sacrificial in his loyalty to John. He had brotherly affection for him.
And so I don’t think the big point of this passage is that Jesus is graciously lowering the standard of the love he’s asking of Peter. Notice in the text that Peter is not comforted by Jesus’ third question. Peter doesn’t kind of have a big sigh of relief and go, oh, thank goodness, Lord, finally, you’ve used the word philio.
That’s great, I can meet the standard of brotherly love. What is emphasised is not the terms, but the times. Verse 17, Peter was hurt because Jesus asked him the third time.
This surely is a painful reminder that Peter had failed to love Jesus three times over. And it gives us a universal principle that we all need to recognise. That for Jesus to graciously restore us, he needs to, first of all, make us face up to our sin.
I mean, Jesus knows all about it anyway. Jesus knows everything, as Peter himself says. Jesus, you know my heart.
You know what love is there and what love isn’t there. Peter’s the one that needs to see how lacking his love for Jesus has been. Yes, Peter loves Jesus, but it’s a faltering and failing love.
And yet Jesus responds again, feed my sheep. I think by this point, it is clear that Jesus has forgiven Peter, not only because he stops asking him, there’s not a fourth question, but because he gives Peter an important role. And this is all done publicly before the other disciples.
See, we might think at first that Jesus doing this publicly is to shame Peter, and I’m sure he did feel ashamed, but it also had the effect of publicly restoring him so that no one could question the fact that Jesus and Peter were on good terms again. How gracious Jesus was and how gracious Jesus is. And because he is that gracious, we can therefore trust him and we can follow him, which brings us to the next section.
Jesus is calling. Secondly, Jesus is calling, he determines our path. You see at the end of verse 18, Jesus says to Peter, follow me.
I suppose that could be a simple invitation to kind of follow him up the beach, because evidently that’s what happens. They go for a walk, as we see in the context. But in the context of what surrounds it, I think there has to be a deeper meaning in the passage and in the whole of John.
It’s interesting that in chapter one of John, we don’t have time to look at this this morning, but two things are emphasised in John one. Jesus is gracious. Three times we’re told that Jesus is full of grace in John one.
And there’s a call of discipleship. John one ends with Jesus calling disciples to follow him. So there’s Jesus is gracious, disciples are called.
And it’s the same two things when we get to the end of John’s gospel. Now, right at the end, Peter, whose name has returned in the text, is commanded to follow again. He’s to follow Jesus and to express his loyal love and his brotherly affection for Christ.
And how is he to do this? Not only by shepherding the sheep, but supremely, verse 18, by dying for Jesus. When he gets older and weaker, he will be dressed by others. He will be led somewhere he won’t want to go, and his hands will be stretched out.
It’s a bit of a foggy prediction of the future, but thankfully, John clears it up for us. Jesus was predicting the kind of death that Peter would die. And it sounds like crucifixion, doesn’t it? Stretching out of the hands.
The Peter who had denied Jesus would one day die for him in loyalty and brotherly love. This is the path determined for Peter, and it is the path by which he will glorify God. He will glorify God by his death.
And just something worth noting, as we pray for the persecuted church, and as we think about Christian martyrs, it is not a tragedy when a Christian dies for Christ. It is a horrible thing. It is an unjust thing.
It is something to be sorrowed, but it is also a glorification of God that draws people to Christ in many circumstances. What a bombshell this must have been. And Peter’s response is very relatable.
He swivels his head and he notices that the disciple whom Jesus loved is walking behind them. They’ve evidently left the fire. Peter and Jesus are walking down the beach, and John, I don’t know what he’s doing exactly, but he’s kind of a few steps behind.
And Peter asks, what about him? I assume he’s asking, will he die in the same way as me? And Jesus says, essentially, that’s none of your business. If I want him to remain alive until I return, then what’s that to you? You must follow me regardless. Jesus wasn’t saying that John would never die.
Some people apparently later took it that way. He was only saying that if he wanted him to remain alive until he returned, then he was sovereign over that decision, not John, not Peter. Obviously, these are unique individuals.
Peter and John have unique roles in the history of the church. Yet I don’t think it’s wrong to see that the essence of this remains true. The Christians follow the same Jesus, but Jesus determines the particular path for each of us.
John’s path was not the same as Peter’s. Peter grew older, and then he died on a cross. John grew very old, and he grew old enough to write a very mature gospel and to glorify God in what he wrote down.
He had a relative peace which allowed him to glorify God in this way. We follow the same Jesus, but we walk the path that his providence lays down to us. That’s why we always need to catch ourselves when we spend our Christian lives looking sideways at the lanes of other Christians, the paths of other Christians.
That is nothing but a recipe for arrogance or envy. God puts you where he wants to put you. God gives you what he wants to give you.
Jesus does through you what he wants to do through you, and it doesn’t matter how it compares to brother A or sister B. I mean, these were both perfectly good paths, and Jesus chose them for them. Peter accepted his assignment, and so did John. In verse 24, I think John is telling us that he’s made the most of the path Jesus had given him.
He couldn’t glorify God as a martyr, but he has glorified God by writing this gospel. This is the disciple who testifies to these things and who wrote them down. I think here John finally emerges from the shadows, and he’s saying, I’m the guy.
I’m the guy who wrote this gospel. The disciple whom Jesus loved is the guy who is the author. This is my testimony.
This is my written account. And then he adds, curiously, he adds, we know that his testimony is true. It’s a shift from my to we.
Some people think it’s a kind of royal we, but more likely, there’s probably some kind of circle around John at this point. Maybe he’s speculating a little bit. Maybe his fellow elders at Ephesus or something like that.
And it seems that there are others who are now picking up the pen at the very end of his gospel saying, yes, this guy, John, he’s the real deal. What he is testifying, we agree, is true. And with that, it looks like the gospel’s done.
The loose ends have been tied up, and yet it would be a wrong note to finish on. It is always the wrong note to finish on the servants, not the master. It is always the wrong note to finish on the disciples, not the teacher.
And so in very brief fashion, John ends by heralding that Jesus is great. He started his gospel by saying that Jesus is great. He did it at length.
And now in a single sentence, he ends the same way. He says, Jesus is so great that he cannot be contained in what is written about him. That’s quite a thing to say at the end of your gospel, isn’t it? John, I mean, I’m assuming John has spent a lifetime preparing to write this weighty account, his personal account of Jesus’ life and death.
This gospel is in some people’s estimation the finest account of the life of Jesus. It is a divinely inspired and authoritative account. And yet, even so, John says, this isn’t even the half of it.
It isn’t even the half. Jesus did many other things as well. What I’ve told you is only part of a much bigger picture.
Many other books could be written about him. I suppose John muses that if everything about Jesus were written down, then all the libraries in the world wouldn’t have enough books to contain him. I walked past Pollock Shaw’s library this morning.
I was just thinking about it. I go in there sometimes and it’s got all these sections. You know, it’s mostly crime, graphic, comics for teenagers, stuff like that.
You would have, think about this, you would have to clear out all the sections of the entire library and fill every single section with books about Jesus. And John says, there still wouldn’t be enough room for all the books that you’d need to write. Because how do you possibly contain the giver of life in books? How do you fully capture the word became flesh? How do you sum up the fulfilment of every promise and every shadow of the Old Testament? Jesus is the bread of life, the all satisfying water, the new temple, the Passover lamb who was slain.
He is the risen conquering Christ, and yet he is forever the gracious one who invites sinners like you and me to breakfast. Incomprehensibly great, but so very gracious.
Do you believe in him? Have you gracious been restored to him? Do you know your sin? Do you know your sins have been forgiven? Some of us have been walking the road for a while, like Peter. And we think we’ve put ourselves in a place that we’re beyond his redemption. We are wrong.
If we think that, we have not understood the heart of Christ. Are you following him? We are called this morning to follow him afresh. As he calls us to glorify him, down the paths that he himself has determined.
What a wonderful thing. What a wonderful Jesus. What a wonderful call.
Let’s respond to it. Let’s respond to him. Let’s pray.
Father, we thank you for the incomprehensibly great Jesus. We thank you for the one who is God, who is truth, and yet he came full of grace and truth. We thank you that this gospel ends with the biggest failure in the gospel, being restored to life and service.
So give us hope today. Show us the gentle heart of Christ, and draw us afresh to faith, to love, and to following him. And it’s in his name we pray, amen.
The post Forgiven and Restored – John 21v15–25 appeared first on Greenview Church.