
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Usually a “chill” on your freedom of speech is the easiest constitutional injury to prove. But in the Tenth Circuit it seems if you speak too much you’re not “chilled,” and therefore not “injured,” even if you’re breaking an unconstitutional law. Adam Shelton walks us through this chilling brain teaser. Meanwhile, when is competition “unfair”? Alexa Gervasi explains that in Massachusetts it was not unfair for Uber to compete against taxicabs when its own right to operate was, shall we say, a grey area. Plus, some nostalgia for the halcyon days of 2013 when getting in a ridesharing car was something you didn’t tell your mother.
Transcript forthcoming.
iTunes: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/short-circuit/id309062019
By Institute for Justice4.7
172172 ratings
Usually a “chill” on your freedom of speech is the easiest constitutional injury to prove. But in the Tenth Circuit it seems if you speak too much you’re not “chilled,” and therefore not “injured,” even if you’re breaking an unconstitutional law. Adam Shelton walks us through this chilling brain teaser. Meanwhile, when is competition “unfair”? Alexa Gervasi explains that in Massachusetts it was not unfair for Uber to compete against taxicabs when its own right to operate was, shall we say, a grey area. Plus, some nostalgia for the halcyon days of 2013 when getting in a ridesharing car was something you didn’t tell your mother.
Transcript forthcoming.
iTunes: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/short-circuit/id309062019

971 Listeners

375 Listeners

701 Listeners

1,110 Listeners

1,515 Listeners

984 Listeners

6,613 Listeners

307 Listeners

40 Listeners

738 Listeners

3,961 Listeners

3,351 Listeners

395 Listeners

745 Listeners

0 Listeners