
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Can state officers simply come on your land and take samples of your dirt (and water) without a warrant? Well, it’s hard to know when the court abstains from telling you. That’s what happened in the Sixth Circuit where a property owner went to federal court to stop an investigation but couldn’t because there was already a state court proceeding. Regular listeners will recognize an old familiar: Younger abstention. Mike Greenberg of IJ joins us to explain this convoluted story and how a case he litigated at the Michigan Supreme Court about drones plays a part in it. Then IJ’s Nick DeBenedetto discusses an en banc Fifth Circuit opinion about the SEC. The agency has to approve certain rules in private stock markets, but are there limits on what those rules can be about? Turns out hot-button diversity issues are a little too far afield. The Major Questions Doctrine makes an appearance, although in a new and perhaps unjustified way. And what does this whole system mean when private entities are beholden to the government approving their own rules?
Click here for transcript.
Satkowiak v. McClain
Alliance for Fair Board Recruitment v. SEC (en banc)
Bound By Oath episode with Professor Bob Williams
Trading Places stock market speech
By Institute for Justice4.7
172172 ratings
Can state officers simply come on your land and take samples of your dirt (and water) without a warrant? Well, it’s hard to know when the court abstains from telling you. That’s what happened in the Sixth Circuit where a property owner went to federal court to stop an investigation but couldn’t because there was already a state court proceeding. Regular listeners will recognize an old familiar: Younger abstention. Mike Greenberg of IJ joins us to explain this convoluted story and how a case he litigated at the Michigan Supreme Court about drones plays a part in it. Then IJ’s Nick DeBenedetto discusses an en banc Fifth Circuit opinion about the SEC. The agency has to approve certain rules in private stock markets, but are there limits on what those rules can be about? Turns out hot-button diversity issues are a little too far afield. The Major Questions Doctrine makes an appearance, although in a new and perhaps unjustified way. And what does this whole system mean when private entities are beholden to the government approving their own rules?
Click here for transcript.
Satkowiak v. McClain
Alliance for Fair Board Recruitment v. SEC (en banc)
Bound By Oath episode with Professor Bob Williams
Trading Places stock market speech

972 Listeners

375 Listeners

693 Listeners

1,113 Listeners

1,509 Listeners

987 Listeners

6,590 Listeners

309 Listeners

40 Listeners

742 Listeners

3,906 Listeners

3,339 Listeners

398 Listeners

744 Listeners

0 Listeners