
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
We look into the gray area between a multi-level-marketing venture, like Amway, and a “pyramid scheme.” Appellate attorney Kyle Singhal joins us to discuss a matter of his from the Sixth Circuit where the court examined whether prosecutors in a mail-fraud case got over their skis by repeatedly calling what the defendants did a pyramid scheme. “Pyramid schemes” are bad, obvs., but they’re not actually a federal crime. So was it OK to use that term when speaking to the jury? Kyle explains what the court said in affirming the convictions. Then, Marie Miller of IJ gives us an update on a case she discussed last year in the Eighth Circuit. A police officer arrested a Missouri man for walking on the wrong side of the road. The court had said his First Amendment retaliation case was no good because there was probable cause for the (uncommonly silly) crime. But then the Supreme Court said give that another try. And the Eighth Circuit did and now has ruled the other way, allowing the case to go forward. Marie explains how the court changed its mind (a change in judges might have helped too).
Click here for transcript.
Come to Short Circuit Live in Chicago on August 17!
US v. Maike
Murphy v. Schmitt (2025)
Murphy v. Schmitt (2023)
Short Circuit 349 (episode on Murphy GVR)
4.6
171171 ratings
We look into the gray area between a multi-level-marketing venture, like Amway, and a “pyramid scheme.” Appellate attorney Kyle Singhal joins us to discuss a matter of his from the Sixth Circuit where the court examined whether prosecutors in a mail-fraud case got over their skis by repeatedly calling what the defendants did a pyramid scheme. “Pyramid schemes” are bad, obvs., but they’re not actually a federal crime. So was it OK to use that term when speaking to the jury? Kyle explains what the court said in affirming the convictions. Then, Marie Miller of IJ gives us an update on a case she discussed last year in the Eighth Circuit. A police officer arrested a Missouri man for walking on the wrong side of the road. The court had said his First Amendment retaliation case was no good because there was probable cause for the (uncommonly silly) crime. But then the Supreme Court said give that another try. And the Eighth Circuit did and now has ruled the other way, allowing the case to go forward. Marie explains how the court changed its mind (a change in judges might have helped too).
Click here for transcript.
Come to Short Circuit Live in Chicago on August 17!
US v. Maike
Murphy v. Schmitt (2025)
Murphy v. Schmitt (2023)
Short Circuit 349 (episode on Murphy GVR)
964 Listeners
701 Listeners
987 Listeners
1,505 Listeners
6,551 Listeners
308 Listeners
42 Listeners
727 Listeners
196 Listeners
3,806 Listeners
3,234 Listeners
372 Listeners
665 Listeners
99 Listeners
1 Listeners