Sons of Liberty Radio with Bradlee Dean

Sons of Liberty Radio with Bradlee Dean

Download on the App Store

Sons of Liberty Radio with Bradlee Dean episodes

  • Sons of Liberty Radio, August 11, 2026
    SONS of LIBERTY Radio with Bradlee Dean
    Anyone Seeing The Correlation Between Illegal Invasion & Illegal Abortion? Me Too!
    Reaping What We Sow: Abortion, Immigration, and the Call to National Accountability
    Summary
    The Episode's Central Correlation
    Bradley Dean frames the episode around what he describes as a moral and spiritual correlation between abortion in the United States and immigration that he characterizes as an illegal invasion. He argues that Americans who tolerate abortion are collectively responsible for the shedding of innocent blood and will, in his biblical interpretation, reap consequences resembling the violence they have allowed against unborn children. Throughout the program, he repeatedly invokes the principle of reaping what one sows and presents national events as divine recompense. He urges listeners not to view the subject as a message of fear, but as a warning intended to produce repentance and action. The argument remains explicitly rooted in Dean's Christian biblical worldview and in his interpretation of Scripture.
    Immigration, Islam, and Government Responsibility
    A large portion of the episode focuses on Dean's claims about Islam, Muslim immigration, Sharia law, fraud, political candidates, schools, and government officials. He plays several prerecorded clips that he says demonstrate ambitions to expand Islamic influence, while also discussing the Muslim Brotherhood and CAIR. Dean accuses elected officials, government agencies, and the mainstream media of enabling or concealing what he describes as a coordinated threat to American sovereignty. He repeatedly characterizes immigration policy and certain public officials' actions as treasonous and argues that Americans have a duty to hold those officials accountable under constitutional and biblical law. These claims are presented by Dean and the inserted clips as part of the episode's broader argument about national responsibility.
    Abortion, Innocent Blood, and Biblical Recompense
    Dean repeatedly returns to abortion as the core moral offense from which he believes national judgment flows. He cites passages including Exodus 20:13, 2 Kings 24:4, Galatians 6:7-9, Proverbs 28, Deuteronomy 28, and Leviticus 26 to support his argument that the shedding of innocent blood brings consequences upon a people. He criticizes political leaders and citizens who celebrate or tolerate abortion and argues that responsibility extends beyond those directly obtaining or performing abortions. A story about a woman asking why God allows abortion becomes a vehicle for Dean's claim that Americans should ask why they themselves allow it. He connects this theme to his repeated insistence that prayer without confronting wrongdoing is insufficient.
    Censorship, Media, and Controlled Opposition
    Another major theme is Dean's belief that censorship and media promotion are used to shape political opposition. He says his own work and the work of others like him are throttled or deplatformed, while prominent media personalities and political figures are elevated as controlled opposition. He names Dennis Prager, Alex Jones, Andrew Tate, Russell Brand, Elon Musk, and several political figures while making a series of sharply critical allegations about them. Dean also argues that mainstream media attention creates legitimacy for politicians he believes are being installed rather than genuinely elected. Across these segments, he urges listeners to distrust media-created heroes and judge public figures by whether justice and accountability actually follow from their actions.
    Personal Responsibility, Law, and the Caller Segment
    Dean repeatedly tells listeners that the country's central problem is refusal to accept personal responsibility. He illustrates the point with a story about a young intoxicated driver who, in his telling, killed a newlywed woman and then focused on what had happened to herself rather than on the victim. Later, Bob from Texas calls to discuss a process he says can be used to confront commissioners, council members, school-board officials, and others over violations of their oaths of office. Although parts of Bob's remarks are garbled in the automated transcript, the clear thrust is that citizens should document alleged oath violations, put them on the record, and replace officials who refuse to correct their conduct. Dean agrees with the emphasis on action and criticizes churches and preachers that he believes remain passive.
    Closing Warnings and Call to Repentance
    In the closing portion, Dean discusses Texas, Florida, Greg Abbott, Ken Paxton, Ron DeSantis, Byron Donalds, AIPAC, and other political subjects through the same framework of distrust, alleged corruption, and national judgment. He warns listeners not to assume that conservative branding or media popularity proves that a public figure is trustworthy. The religious conclusion is direct: he says judgments increase when people refuse correction and that their purpose is to drive people toward repentance. He closes with the message, "repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand," promotes his book Children of the Apostate, and encourages listeners to support the ministry through Sons of Liberty Media. The episode ends by reiterating his longstanding theme that prevention, repentance, and personal responsibility are preferable to suffering consequences later.
    1 hr 30 min
  • Sons of Liberty Radio, August 10, 2026
    SONS of LIBERTY Radio with Bradlee Dean
    Mike Lindell Joins Bradlee Dean LIVE
    Mike Lindell Confronts Media Claims, GOP Resistance and the Minnesota Governor Race
    Summary
    Biblical and Constitutional Framework
    The episode opens with Bradlee Dean presenting a Christian and constitutional argument about authority, law, and the founding of the United States. He cites biblical passages and historical figures to support his view that American government was intended to operate within a moral and religious framework. Dean compares Scripture and the founding documents to an instruction manual, arguing that changing or ignoring that manual produces disorder and loss of liberty. The program also includes a statement that the organization is politically neutral while approaching its content from a Christian biblical worldview. Dean announces several upcoming appearances, including an event in Johnstown, Colorado, the Minnesota State Fair, and a Civic Center event in Princeton, Minnesota. The opening establishes the episode's recurring themes of faith, constitutional government, personal responsibility, and distrust of institutions that Dean believes have departed from their proper role.
    Fraud Allegations and Media Framing
    Before bringing Mike Lindell into the interview, Dean discusses alleged fraud involving members of Somali communities in several states and plays a prerecorded exchange involving an unidentified Seattle reporter and an unidentified Seattle mayor. In that clip, the reporter asks whether fraud claims have been referred for follow-up, while the mayor emphasizes concerns about immigrant communities being targeted and says the broader issue is not really about fraud. Dean strongly rejects that framing and argues that law enforcement and investigation should focus on alleged wrongdoing rather than group identity. He presents the Minnesota situation as part of a broader pattern and accuses mainstream media of failing to keep the issue in proper context. These allegations and numerical claims are presented as statements made by Dean and the prerecorded speakers and are not independently verified within the transcript. The segment leads directly into Dean's explanation that he invited Lindell back to respond personally to claims being made about him.
    Minnesota Republican Primary and Establishment Conflict
    Lindell says he expected resistance from Republican Party figures but was surprised that party leaders were not fully supporting their own endorsed candidate, Kendall Qualls. He argues that establishment figures instead favored Lisa Demuth and describes the Duluth convention, polling, betting markets, and media coverage as evidence of an organized effort against his candidacy. Lindell repeatedly criticizes the Star Tribune and says its treatment of him changed after his association with Donald Trump became public in 2016. Dean and Lindell also criticize Demuth's record and discuss fraud allegations in Minnesota, with Lindell claiming that Republican leaders failed to act forcefully enough. A KSTP / SurveyUSA poll becomes part of the discussion, with Lindell saying he was up by seven points in that poll while acknowledging movement among voters age 65 and older. Both speakers frame the primary contest as a struggle between an outsider candidate and what they describe as an entrenched political establishment.
    Pillow Giveaway, Amnesty and Residency Disputes
    A major portion of the interview is devoted to controversies that Lindell says have been distorted by opponents and media outlets. He says small GoAnywhere pillows distributed at parades cost $4.90 each and argues that the dispute over their campaign value is being exaggerated into a threat to his eligibility. Lindell then addresses reports that he supported immigration amnesty, saying his actual proposal involved a temporary period for identifying and fingerprinting people, cooperating with ICE, and addressing people already in custody. He attributes some of the confusion to a social-media graphic that used the phrase "Six-month amnesty?" with a question mark that he says was too easy to miss. Lindell also rejects questions about his Minnesota residency, stating that he began paying Minnesota taxes in August 2025, obtained a Minnesota license and registered to vote in September 2025, and provided documentation of his residency. Throughout these exchanges, Dean gives Lindell extended time to explain his version of the disputes and repeatedly criticizes media outlets for presenting allegations without sufficient context.
    Trump Endorsement and Campaign Strategy
    In the final interview segment, Dean asks whether Donald Trump's endorsement helps Lindell and whether any conditions or political strings are attached. Lindell says the endorsement has helped substantially, claims it produced a large increase in support, and describes a campaign strategy aimed at voters who participated in the 2020 and 2024 elections but skipped the 2022 election. He says the endorsement came without conditions and that he did not request it when he told Trump about his candidacy in December 2025. Lindell describes his relationship with Trump as a two-way exchange in which each has asked the other for perspective on political or policy questions. He also says his own marketing strategy will focus on common-sense solutions intended to appeal beyond the Republican base, including independents and Democrats. The discussion presents Trump's endorsement as an important campaign asset while Lindell emphasizes that he intends to make his own decisions as governor.
    Policy Questions, Accountability and Closing Appeal
    Dean closes the interview by taking a listener question about data centers and surveillance cameras and by asking Lindell what he would do about alleged fraud involving Minnesota officials. Lindell says he needs to research data centers and surveillance more deeply but is presently opposed to them based on what he has heard, and he compares his concerns to his long-standing opposition to windmills. He says a governor should be transparent if evidence shows benefits that the public should consider. On alleged government fraud, Lindell says he would pursue investigations and names Keith Ellison, Tim Walz, Ilhan Omar, and Steve Simon while making serious accusations that remain the guest's claims within the transcript. He also discusses the value of having direct access to the President and other governors when federal programs or Minnesota-specific problems require action. The interview ends with Lindell directing listeners to his campaign website and asking supporters to share campaign information on social media, followed by Dean wishing him luck in the upcoming primary.
    59 min
  • Sons of Liberty Radio, August 9, 2026
    SONS of LIBERTY Radio with Bradlee Dean
    The Spiritual Warfare Is One In Which We Must Grow
    Growing Through the Battle: Discipline, Discernment, and the Christian Call to Stand
    Summary
    Spiritual Warfare as a Life of Active Faith
    The episode presents the Christian life as an ongoing spiritual battle rather than a passive or compartmentalized religious experience. The host argues that believers are called to remain vigilant, guard their hearts, and move from defensive thinking into active obedience. He repeatedly contrasts this view with what he describes as an American form of Christianity that expects God to act while believers remain spectators. Biblical images of soldiers, armor, battle, and pressing forward are used to frame the call to perseverance. The host's central point is that spiritual warfare is not separate from Christian growth; it is one of the primary settings in which that growth takes place.
    Born Again, Sanctified, and Called to Obedience
    The teaching moves into the host's understanding of the born-again experience, drawing heavily on Ezekiel 36 and related passages. He emphasizes a new heart, a new spirit, cleansing from former ways, and a life that demonstrates conversion through obedience. He rejects denominational identity as the defining mark of Christianity and instead centers identity on being born again in Christ. Throughout this section, the host argues that grace should produce transformation rather than serve as permission to return repeatedly to an old way of life. Prayer and worship are woven into the message as expressions of dependence on God and the Holy Spirit.
    Weakness, Calling, and Dependence on God
    A recurring theme is that people genuinely called by God often feel weak, inadequate, unworthy, or reluctant rather than self-important. The host points to Moses, Saul, Jonah, Gideon, Peter, John, Paul, and other biblical figures as examples of people whose limitations forced them to rely on God. He contrasts that humility with what he describes as self-appointed spiritual authority, celebrity-style ministry, and the desire for the praise of people. The message argues that weakness can become a place of dependence, while self-assertion can become a spiritual danger. In this framework, believers grow when they stop using inadequacy as an excuse and begin acting in reliance on grace.
    Discernment, Repentance, and the Rejection of Spectator Christianity
    The host repeatedly calls for discernment between what he considers genuine biblical Christianity and counterfeit or compromised forms of religion. He criticizes preaching that avoids repentance, confrontation of sin, cultural engagement, or the responsibilities of discipleship. The episode also attacks what he describes as a "good old boy" culture among religious leaders and compares that problem with citizens treating political representatives like celebrities rather than servants. He urges listeners to study Scripture for themselves, make judgments according to the Word rather than personal preference, and accept correction as part of growth. The intended alternative is a church focused on raising disciples and servants rather than followers, spectators, or consumers.
    Growth in Grace Requires Daily Tending
    The host uses gardening as a practical picture of spiritual formation. Just as a garden must be planted, watered, fertilized, protected, weeded, and continually tended, he says a believer must continually guard the mind, remain in the Word, resist distracting thoughts, and stay attentive to spiritual influences. He applies the same principle to friendships, family priorities, ministry responsibility, and the need to keep Christ first rather than allowing other relationships or interests to become controlling attachments. Patience is presented as part of maturity because growth cannot be forced into an instant or "microwave" process. The Christian life is therefore described as disciplined, lifelong development rather than a one-time emotional experience.
    Perseverance, Service, and Finishing the Course
    In the closing portion, the host returns to Ephesians 6, Philippians 3, and quotations from earlier Christian writers to reinforce the image of a disciplined soldier pressing forward. He argues that believers should expect resistance, hardship, distraction, and cultural opposition while continuing to serve, evangelize, pray, study, and act. The episode also extends the message into education, public life, ministry leadership, family example, and the responsibility to address wrongdoing rather than remain silent. The host closes by urging listeners not to stop midway through their spiritual course, but to seek more grace and continue until the work is finished. He then gives ministry support information, upcoming event details, and a final appeal for listeners to help sustain the work.
    3 hr 2 min
  • Sons of Liberty Radio, August 8, 2026
    SONS of LIBERTY Radio with Bradlee Dean
    A Country In Distress
    When Fear Becomes Policy: Surveillance, Crisis, and the Fight for American Liberty
    Summary
    A Nation Framed Through Fear and Crisis
    The episode presents the host’s argument that the United States is in severe distress because citizens have allowed government, media, and political institutions to accumulate power through repeated appeals to fear. Bradley Dean moves through a long list of wars, public-health scares, economic emergencies, and national-security events to argue that crisis narratives have repeatedly conditioned the public to accept expanded authority. He cites historical quotations, biblical passages, and examples from past administrations to support his position that fear weakens self-government. Throughout the first hour, he emphasizes that Americans themselves bear responsibility when they fail to demand accountability. The program repeatedly contrasts fear of government or social consequences with what the host describes as a biblical fear of God. This framework becomes the organizing idea connecting the episode’s otherwise wide range of subjects.
    War, Political Power, and Public Accountability
    The host and caller Sal discuss war, the military-industrial complex, and the idea that political leaders should personally bear responsibility for wars they initiate. Sal references Smedley Butler’s War Is a Racket, while Dean distinguishes what he calls righteous wars from wars driven by politicians, financiers, and institutional interests. Dean says he comes from a military family and stresses that his criticism is directed at political uses of military power rather than at service members. The discussion argues that citizens should require leaders to justify war before sending younger generations to fight. Dean repeatedly returns to the idea that political elites exercise only as much control as the public permits. The exchange reinforces the episode’s larger emphasis on civic responsibility and resistance to unaccountable power.
    Pandemic Claims, Vaccines, and Institutional Distrust
    A major portion of the program revisits the COVID-19 era and other disease scares through the host’s highly critical perspective. Dean alleges wrongdoing by government agencies, pharmaceutical companies, Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates, and others, and he presents these assertions as evidence of a broader pattern of manufactured or exploited crises. A prerecorded Gina Carano clip is used to emphasize opposition to vaccine mandates and regret over not speaking more forcefully. Dean also recounts his own refusal to comply with masking rules during air travel and portrays that experience as an example of resisting coercion. Caller Ken raises concerns about illness after tick bites and unusual weather, which Dean connects to broader claims about environmental manipulation and government misconduct. These medical and scientific assertions are presented in the episode as the speakers’ claims and were not independently verified for this transcript cleanup.
    Flock Cameras, Palantir, and Digital Surveillance
    The second hour shifts heavily toward surveillance technology, especially Flock cameras, data collection, and the possibility of a broader social-credit-style system. Dean questions where government obtained authority to deploy such systems and argues that public consent has been bypassed. A prerecorded doctor’s clip discusses consent and alleged efforts to avoid public-comment processes, while another clip describes reported cases of law-enforcement personnel using Flock cameras for stalking. Dean then plays an interview with a young person from China who describes facial recognition, WeChat and Alipay, digital tracking, and social-credit mechanisms. The host connects those examples to Palantir, data centers, vaccine passports, and expanded government monitoring in the United States. The segment’s central warning is that surveillance infrastructure, once normalized, may become difficult to reverse.
    Immigration, Islam, Zionism, and Censorship
    The latter part of the episode moves into highly controversial political and religious commentary concerning immigration, Muslim political candidates, Zionism, Israel, antisemitism, and censorship. Dean argues that government and media institutions are promoting people or policies he views as hostile to American constitutional government, and he names several public figures while making allegations about their motives and affiliations. He distinguishes anti-Zionism from antisemitism and says individuals should be judged according to conduct rather than ethnicity. Inserted clips discuss Abdul El-Sayed, alleged organizational ties, and efforts to document or penalize people accused of targeting Jewish students. Dean also criticizes political donations, AIPAC influence, restrictions on criticism of Israel, and what he describes as expanding censorship. These are preserved as the host’s and clip speakers’ views rather than presented as established fact.
    Biblical Government and the Call to Act
    Across both hours, the program repeatedly returns to a Christian biblical worldview as its proposed answer to political and social disorder. Dean quotes or paraphrases the Declaration of Independence, biblical passages, historical figures, and Christian thinkers to argue that legitimate government depends on law, justice, and a morally responsible citizenry. He says resistance to tyranny is consistent with the founding principles of the United States and repeatedly urges listeners not to remain passive. Promotional segments reinforce the program’s church services, public events, supporter network, media platform, and related news outlets. The episode closes with a warning that censorship and political intimidation are increasing and with another invitation to the Sunday church service. The final message is that, in the host’s view, national restoration depends on citizens confronting wrongdoing rather than merely listening to commentary about it.
    2 hr
  • Sons of Liberty Radio, August 7, 2026
    SONS of LIBERTY Radio with Bradlee Dean
    Look Behind What You Are Told
    Behind the Curtain: Power, Surveillance, and Public Accountability
    Summary
    Looking Beyond the Surface
    Bradley Dean frames the episode around a call to "look behind" prevailing narratives and to question what listeners are told by media, corporations, and government institutions. The program begins with prerecorded material about Palestine and Israel, including historical maps, claims about the backgrounds and names of Israeli leaders, and criticism of Christian Zionist narratives. Throughout the episode, Dean urges listeners to speak with neighbors, resist fear, and challenge what he considers propaganda, censorship, and managed public opinion. He presents these themes through a Christian biblical worldview and repeatedly links civic responsibility to religious duty.
    Scientists, Whistleblowers, and Institutional Distrust
    A major early segment focuses on prerecorded claims about scientists, researchers, and intelligence-connected individuals who allegedly disappeared or died under suspicious circumstances. Dean interprets the material as evidence that people preparing to expose wrongdoing may be targeted, and he connects those assertions to earlier controversies involving doctors and the COVID-19 era. The transcript does not independently establish the accuracy of the named cases or the causes of death, but Dean uses them to argue that whistleblowers and researchers need public support. He also criticizes pharmaceutical companies, government agencies, and public officials, alleging that investigations and accountability have repeatedly failed.
    Biblical Law, Abortion, and National Judgment
    Dean then turns to Scripture, citing Exodus, Matthew, Proverbs, and 2 Kings as foundations for his argument that government cannot legitimately exercise authority beyond what has been delegated to it. He discusses abortion in strongly condemnatory religious terms and argues that the shedding of innocent blood brings judgment on a nation. He also discusses a Massachusetts bill and Muslim immigration, making broad and hostile claims about Muslims that are presented in the transcript as his own assertions rather than verified facts. The central point of this portion is his belief that citizens share responsibility when they tolerate actions that he considers immoral or unlawful.
    Vaccines, Personal Loss, and the Demand to Question
    The episode includes video and audio material concerning vaccination and alleged vaccine injuries, followed by a prerecorded clip of Gina Carano discussing a man named Anthony who received a Pfizer vaccine and died the next day. Carano says she would have spoken even louder against lockdowns and forced vaccination, while Dean responds by urging listeners to question authority and refuse coercion. He also repeats claims involving Bill Gates, Tony Fauci, pandemic policy, and large numbers of deaths, none of which are independently verified by the transcript. Dean uses these examples to reinforce his recurring message that silence enables institutions to continue what he sees as abuses.
    Flock Cameras and the Expansion of Surveillance
    A substantial section examines Flock cameras, delegated government authority, public consent, and the risk of surveillance systems being abused. Dean plays a clip from a speaker he identifies as Dr. John Padfield, followed by a public commenter who alleges cases of law-enforcement officers using Flock cameras for stalking. Another prerecorded commentator describes China's facial-recognition and digital-surveillance infrastructure, including WeChat, Alipay, social-credit mechanisms, GPS tracking, and government access to personal data. Dean argues that these technologies illustrate how systems introduced for security can expand into broad social control, and he warns that similar tools could be normalized in the United States.
    Foreign Policy, Intelligence Claims, and the Closing Call to Accountability
    Near the end, caller Mont raises tariffs and makes allegations about the 1983 Beirut barracks bombing, Israel, and U.S. officials. Dean expands the discussion into claims about Hezbollah, al-Qaeda, intelligence agencies, AIPAC, Benjamin Netanyahu, and the so-called "dancing Israelis" connected in the episode to 9/11. A prerecorded documentary-style clip presents FBI-related claims about Urban Moving Systems and Israeli intelligence, while Dean interprets the material as evidence that the public must look behind official explanations and question who benefits from war and political narratives. He closes by urging listeners to take responsibility, return to God, and demand accountability rather than waiting for political leaders to solve problems for them.
    1 hr
  • Sons of Liberty Radio, August 5, 2026
    SONS of LIBERTY Radio with Bradlee Dean
    Staying On Top Of All The Attacks That Are Coming From Within
    Manufactured Crises, Media Narratives, and the Erosion of Constitutional Rights
    Summary
    Media Narratives and Reversed Roles
    The episode centers on Bradley Dean's argument that major media institutions persuade audiences to identify oppressors as victims and victims as wrongdoers. He repeatedly invokes a warning that newspapers can cause people to hate those being oppressed while admiring those doing the oppressing. The opening and closing portions apply this framework to political movements, religious groups, public officials, and historical events. Dean presents the program as an effort to look behind accepted narratives and identify what he believes are organized agendas operating within the United States.
    Rodney King, George Floyd, and Racial Conflict
    Dean uses the Rodney King case as his first major example, asserting that news organizations withheld facts about the police pursuit, King's conduct, and evidence presented at trial while repeatedly broadcasting the beating footage. Caller Sal agrees and says complete footage is difficult to find, connecting that concern to coverage of George Floyd. Dean then makes sweeping and unverified allegations about the Floyd case, protests, political officials, and the media's role in creating racial crises. Throughout this section, the speakers characterize major incidents of racial unrest as deliberately manufactured rather than spontaneous.
    Flock Cameras and Constitutional Limits
    A substantial portion of the program addresses Flock automated license-plate-reader cameras and the Fourth Amendment. Dean argues that the government never possessed lawful authority to conduct warrantless surveillance and criticizes proposed legislation that, in his view, falsely presents constitutional protection as something politicians must restore. A news clip reports that license-plate readers were damaged near Winona and Buffalo County while noting both law-enforcement uses and civil-liberties concerns. Dean connects the cameras to broader claims about government surveillance, taxpayer funding, trafficking, and the public's responsibility to enforce existing constitutional limits.
    War, Terror, Chemtrails, and Institutional Power
    The program later links surveillance to September 11, the TSA, the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, COVID-19, vaccines, and chemtrail allegations. A prerecorded chemtrails clip claims that wealthy families and powerful organizations are involved in atmospheric spraying, while Dean says the same institutions present themselves as problem solvers after creating the problem. An Aaron Russo clip is introduced as evidence that Nicholas Rockefeller allegedly had advance knowledge of an event that would enable war and expanded government control. These claims are presented by the speakers as interconnected examples of fear being used to justify permanent authority, surveillance, and conflict.
    Biblical Government and Civic Resistance
    Dean consistently interprets political events through a Christian biblical worldview, quoting or referencing Genesis, John, Romans, Revelation, Deuteronomy, Isaiah, Acts, Galatians, Jeremiah, and 1 Timothy. He reads portions of the Fourth Amendment and Declaration of Independence and argues that constitutional rights are commands restricting government, not privileges granted by officials. Caller Bob reinforces the importance of the Declaration's appeal to the laws of nature and Nature's God, though parts of his remarks are garbled. Promotional segments similarly call listeners toward church participation, public action, financial support, and community events.
    Religious and Electoral Controversies
    In the final segment, Dean discusses Muslim political candidates, Abdul El-Sayed's Michigan Senate campaign, AIPAC spending, mosque construction, Palestine, Medicare for All, and claims about Zionist influence. He makes broad negative generalizations about Muslims, alleges that political and religious groups are coordinating against Christians, and cites a disputed quotation attributed to Rabbi David Touitou. He also raises allegations concerning Texas officials, New York politics, voter fraud, and efforts to punish criticism of Zionism. The episode closes by warning that those who silence public criticism seek political rule and by directing listeners to the program's websites and schedule.
    1 hr
  • Sons of Liberty Radio, August 4, 2026
    SONS of LIBERTY Radio with Bradlee Dean
    The Enemies Are In Plain Sight Acting Out As Your Saviors
    When Saviors Serve the System: Surveillance, Political Theater, and Controlled Opposition
    Summary
    Enemies in Plain Sight
    The program opens with prerecorded commentary criticizing Zionism, Theodor Herzl, the Rothschild family, Israeli policy, the Star of David, and the reduction of Palestinian territory. It then moves through a Christian constitutional disclaimer before Bradley Dean introduces the episode's central theme: people presented to the public as protectors or saviors may, in his view, be participating in the very systems that create the problems they claim to solve.
    Public Health, Fauci, and Political Fundraising
    Dean revisits claims made during an earlier interview with Dr. Tenpenny and attributes recent deaths of young athletes to mRNA injections, while asserting that Anthony Fauci and public-health institutions have escaped accountability. Caller Sal criticizes both Fauci and Rand Paul, and Dean expands the argument by accusing Paul and other conservative politicians of using public confrontation, fundraising, and televised hearings as substitutes for prosecution and justice.
    Flock Cameras and the Fourth Amendment
    A major portion of the episode focuses on Flock surveillance cameras, government access to collected data, and alleged abuses by law-enforcement personnel. Dean argues that the systems were introduced without legitimate delegated authority and frames public protests and camera removals as resistance to unconstitutional surveillance. A prerecorded Thomas Massie clip warns against trading privacy and freedom of movement for promises of security, although Dean criticizes Massie's proposed legislation as another delay rather than direct accountability.
    Political Theater, J.D. Vance, and the Epstein Files
    The host presents a prerecorded segment linking J.D. Vance's political rise to Peter Thiel, Palantir Technologies, surveillance systems, and campaign support. He then plays a clip of Marjorie Taylor Greene describing resistance from Donald Trump, Mike Johnson, Pam Bondi, and the Department of Justice to releasing Epstein-related files. Dean agrees that the subject demands accountability but criticizes Greene's focus and argues that the full range of victims and alleged participants must be confronted.
    Provocateurs and Controlled Opposition
    In the final portion, Dean describes Jake Lang as a paid provocateur who is attempting to inflame conflict between Christians and Muslims. He condemns rock-throwing and other violence while arguing that lawful action should be used against both illegal immigration and those he accuses of enabling it. He also attacks Alex Jones, Russell Brand, and Candace Owens as media figures who, in his view, receive promotion while functioning as controlled opposition rather than genuine defenders of constitutional law.
    Faith, Justice, and Citizen Action
    Throughout the broadcast, Dean grounds his arguments in a Christian biblical worldview and repeatedly presents Jesus Christ as the only true Savior. He urges listeners to know the Constitution, recognize alleged violations of delegated authority, reject political appeasement, and demand justice rather than accept speeches, hearings, or proposed bills as meaningful action. Calls, station promotions, church invitations, fundraising appeals, and media-network advertisements are interwoven with the central message that organized citizens possess power when they unite and act.
    1 hr
  • Sons of Liberty Radio, August 3, 2026
    SONS of LIBERTY Radio with Bradlee Dean
    What Is Happening? You Know!
    Give Up Wrongs, Not Rights: Surveillance, Debt, and National Accountability
    Summary
    A Call to Amend the Nation's Ways
    The episode opens with a prerecorded commentary that frames abortion, media narratives, identity-based political movements, immigration, and government power through a Christian biblical worldview. After the program disclaimer, Bradlee Dean argues that Americans already recognize political corruption and do not need endless exposure to the same scandals. His central message is that citizens must "amend their ways," condemn wrongdoing, justify the innocent, and establish justice within the nation's gates. Drawing on Jeremiah, Leviticus, Amos, and other biblical references, he presents repentance and lawful accountability as the remedy for national decline.
    Give Up Wrongs, Not Rights
    Dean's principal policy discussion concerns Flock automated surveillance cameras and the authority of public officials to install or finance them. He argues that representatives possess only delegated authority and that undisclosed arrangements with corporations should lead to impeachment, prosecution, or other legal accountability. He rejects the idea that citizens must surrender rights to obtain public safety, warning that lost privacy destroys freedom and lost trust destroys dignity. His repeated formulation is that society should give up wrongs rather than God-given rights.
    Listeners Bring Encouragement and Questions
    Ken from West Virginia calls to praise the program as a community service rather than entertainment, comparing its value to Dave Krieger's work. Bev from Wisconsin then asks about the distinction between knowledge and wisdom, prompting Dean to define wisdom as possessing knowledge and knowing how to use it, with understanding also playing a role. Bev attempts to raise concerns about artificial intelligence, data storage, and information, but a failing telephone connection obscures most of her argument. The host pauses the conversation and invites her to call back from a location with a stronger signal.
    A Tennessee Dispute Over Flock Cameras
    Jeff from Tennessee describes a local political candidate who allegedly shot and disabled several Flock cameras and consequently faced felony charges. Dean and Jeff contrast the government's response to damaged surveillance equipment with what they view as weak enforcement against official wrongdoing. Jeff claims each camera carries a $4,000 annual subscription paid with tax dollars and urges citizens to pressure commissioners and representatives to stop funding the system. Their exchange broadens into a debate about taxation, delegated authority, political theater, and whether highly visible officeholders are genuine defenders of liberty.
    Debt, Taxation, and Public Responsibility
    The conversation moves from surveillance financing to national debt, state and local taxes, and the power of government to impose obligations without direct public approval. Dean and Jeff discuss balanced budgets, Social Security funds, accumulated federal debt, and the host's assertion that early administrations were expected to eliminate debt before leaving office. Dean invokes the Cloward-Piven concept and an Ethan Allen quotation while arguing that unsustainable spending and political inaction make citizens accomplices when they fail to demand judgment against wrongdoing. He returns to his biblical refrain that the public must amend its ways and establish justice.
    Trump, Abortion, and Rejection of the Uniparty
    In the final segment, Dean asks Siri about the projected fiscal year 2026 federal budget deficit and then challenges the figures while criticizing Donald Trump's debt record, media image, vaccine claims, and political following. A caller from Utah adds allegations concerning abortion totals and borrowing during Trump's presidencies. Dean responds by citing an article he has opened and claims that Trump increased funding connected to Planned Parenthood beyond the amount attributed to Barack Obama. He closes by stressing that his allegiance is to law rather than either major political party and by urging listeners to judge political figures by their actions rather than their words.
    1 hr
  • Sons of Liberty Radio, August 1, 2026
    SONS of LIBERTY Radio with Bradlee Dean
    Flock CEO Calls Americans "'Deflock' Domestic Terrorists"
    Watched, Branded, and Defied: The Fight Over Flock Surveillance
    Summary
    Surveillance as the Central Conflict
    The episode centers on Flock Safety camera systems, automated license-plate surveillance, and the host's argument that these technologies violate constitutional privacy protections. Bradley Dean repeatedly frames the dispute through the Fourth Amendment, biblical authority, and the idea that government may exercise only powers lawfully delegated to it. He contends that officials and corporations use crime and public safety as justifications for building a system capable of tracking ordinary Americans. The closing audio provides the episode's central flash point: a Flock executive describes DeFlock as a terroristic organization motivated by chaos and compares it with Antifa.
    A Local Challenge in Hutchinson
    Guest caller Margie describes attending a board meeting in Hutchinson, Minnesota, with her Bible and Constitution. She says she attempted to question officials about Flock cameras, a proposed data center, water use, and related records, but was interrupted and told that the board would not waste time on what it called a conspiracy theory. Although several sentences in her account are badly garbled, the clear substance is that she felt dismissed and defeated before resolving not to give up. The host presents her appearance as an example of citizens directly confronting local officials over surveillance decisions that may be made without broad public awareness.
    The Constitutional and Biblical Framework
    Throughout both hours, the host connects opposition to Flock cameras with a wider argument about constitutional government, Christian responsibility, and public accountability. He cites Scripture, the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and numerous quotations attributed to American founders, abolitionists, and political thinkers. He argues that the country loses freedom when citizens accept agencies, regulations, or technologies that he regards as unconstitutional. He also rejects conventional left-right party divisions, describing them as a divide-and-conquer system that distracts people from a single legal and moral standard.
    Pandemic Messaging as a Warning
    A large portion of the program revisits pandemic-era media commentary to illustrate what the host considers a recurring method of stigmatizing dissenters. A prerecorded montage includes statements blaming or condemning unvaccinated people, while the host argues that government and media interests used fear, moral accusation, and social pressure to enforce compliance. He connects those clips to the present Flock debate, saying that people who reject a surveillance system are again being portrayed as threats. These medical, media, and political claims are presented as the host's interpretation and are not independently verified within the transcript.
    Turning Surveillance Back on Its Supporters
    Several prerecorded clips show activists and commentators applying surveillance logic to Flock employees and public officials. One activist describes filming anonymous Flock facilities and employees, noting that workers felt unsafe when they themselves were recorded. A satirical presentation proposes a fictional "Shepherd Safety" system that would track government officials, spouses, children, vehicles, meetings, and movements in the same manner used against the public. The host uses these examples to argue that officials and corporate representatives often object to surveillance when the same power is directed at them.
    Resistance, Accountability, and the DeFlock Label
    The final portion emphasizes protest, impeachment, prosecution, and consequences for officials whom the host believes violate their oaths. A news clip reports a hot-mic conversation about potentially excluding disruptive attendees from future public meetings, while another commentator discusses people damaging Flock cameras. The host insists that his position is enforcement of constitutional law rather than insurrection, though he also uses forceful and at times violent rhetoric when discussing punishment for alleged treason. The episode closes by replaying the Flock executive's statement about DeFlock, which the host treats as proof that surveillance supporters are attempting to criminalize political opposition.
    2 hr
  • Sons of Liberty Radio, July 31, 2026
    SONS of LIBERTY Radio with Bradlee Dean
    Kendall Qualls Joins Bradlee Dean
    Kendall Qualls on Faith, Accountability, and Minnesota's Political Future
    Summary
    A Constitutional and Biblical Framework
    The episode opens with a prerecorded commentary arguing that government deteriorates when it abandons the principles on which it was founded. The speaker connects biblical teachings, quotations attributed to American founders, and the U.S. Constitution to the program's belief that civil liberty depends upon Christian moral principles. Through map and rulebook analogies, the commentary contends that replacing the country's foundational instructions with man-made rules inevitably takes government off course. The opening also states that the program approaches political and social issues from a Christian biblical worldview.
    Media Pressure and Vaccination-Era Rhetoric
    Bradlee Dean introduces a montage of television and radio clips in which unidentified commentators criticize, shame, or propose penalties for people who remained unvaccinated during the COVID-19 period. Dean argues that the clips demonstrate coordinated messaging by corporate media and pharmaceutical interests, and he characterizes that messaging as government by intimidation. He also repeats serious allegations concerning Anthony Fauci, Donald Trump, vaccination policy, and pandemic deaths, presenting them as his own conclusions. Several media excerpts are incomplete or overlapped, but their recurring theme is hostility toward unvaccinated people and the rejection of personal-choice arguments.
    Kendall Qualls and the Outsider Campaign
    The central interview introduces Kendall Qualls as a Minnesota gubernatorial candidate, Army veteran, longtime business leader, and founder of the nonprofit TakeCharge. Qualls describes work supporting marriage and family in urban Black communities, particularly in North and South Minneapolis. He argues that Minnesota Republicans have failed to win the governorship because they repeatedly elevate conventional politicians rather than outsiders. Qualls presents himself as a business-minded candidate who openly emphasizes faith, country, family, and a return to basic principles.
    Accountability, Fraud, and Minnesota Government
    Dean presses Qualls on alleged fraud, investigations, impeachment efforts, and what both men describe as failures of accountability in Minnesota government. Qualls says political ideology has replaced a shared moral compass and argues that both Democrats and establishment Republicans have enabled harmful omnibus legislation. He says his campaign seeks a legislative trifecta and promises investigations, firings, and legal responsibility for public officials who violate the law. Dean repeatedly insists that resignation or removal is insufficient and that officials must face prosecution when the evidence and law support it.
    Faith, Identity, and Political Leadership
    Qualls discusses the public response to his campaign, his 40-year marriage, his family, and the encouragement he says he has received at county fairs and other events across Minnesota. He describes politics as a force that reveals character rather than creating it and says the political establishment opposes him because it cannot control him. In response to Dean's spiritual questions, Qualls says he and his wife believe the campaign is a God-ordained calling and that victory would be God-delivered. He identifies himself first as a Christian, describes his running mate as an outsider and entrepreneur, and directs listeners to his campaign website and Contract with Minnesota.
    Vetting Candidates and Resisting Surveillance
    After the interview, Dean reflects that Qualls may have answered some questions only partially, but he says his purpose is to place candidates before the audience and let them speak for themselves. He criticizes politicians who campaign on constitutional promises and later operate beyond their delegated authority, and he rejects the conventional Republican-Democratic framework as a manufactured divide. The episode concludes with Dean's opposition to Flock camera systems, which he characterizes as intrusive surveillance and a Fourth Amendment violation. He argues that governments create or tolerate problems and then use those problems to justify increased control over the public.
    1 hr

About Sons of Liberty Radio with Bradlee Dean

From the publisher's feed

Tired of hearing all of the gloom and doom and talking around the issues? Equip yourself with the truth that is protecting our liberty for generations to come. Get your daily dose of news and history…

Best of Sons of Liberty Radio with Bradlee Dean

Ranked by our users in the last 21 days