
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


The Pfizer fact sheet alerts people to the fact that this vaccination is voluntary and that they must sign a consent for services form. That they have read, understand, and do not know at all what they are signing away; particularly since the pharmaceutical companies have been granted complete immunity from prosecution. What are the implications before law?
Under PA law there is in place under "The Child Protective Services Act" a list of requirements to define what is child abuse, to require the mandatory reporting of anyone who enables or encourages child abuse. One of those provisions specifically identifies any effort to limit or suppress airflow to a child. A face mask does that and renowned doctors and patient advocates around the country are identifying the harm being done to young developing brains due to the limiting of oxygen and the forced recycling of CO2. What are the unintended consequences of making law unlawfully and overruling existing law carefully put in place to protect people?
The government is attempting to put pressure on entire industries like airlines, teachers, hospitals, and frontline workers by saying you can’t travel, work, or access education unless you submit to the vaccine. How far can third party entities require what is otherwise unconstitutional and what can the citizen do?
At this point the vaccinations are not mandated by law, but it’s heading that way. Are mandated vaccinations lawful, constitutional, or moral? From a law perspective, how should this fact shape any Christian or Constitutionally minded citizen’s attitude toward this vaccine?
The underlying lack of law in regard to the dictates of masking, distancing, worship & public gatherings, and now vaccinations; in most every case these dictates have come from the Executive Branch of the Federal Government (The respective governor’s office or mayors). It is not the law and the Executive Branch is therefore in violation by attempting to make law (by justifying it all under the pretense of an “emergency declaration”). Do these various dictates constitute ‘law’? Are they “lawful”?
COVID-19 and the Law: Vaccinations, Masking and Consent. We are joined by Mat Staver (Founder, Liberty Counsel). Topics discussed include: Unlawful Mandates and the Law. Mandatory Vaccinations and the Law. Informed Consent and the Law. Informed Consent and the Law.
For someone to be successful in double-crossing another person there are always two people involved, the one doing the double crossing and the one being double crossed. What techniques are being used by the double crossers that is proving so successful?
Who are the people currently driving the ideology we are currently witnessing worldwide?
How are mask dictates being used to manipulate Americans into giving up their freedom?
Leo Hohmann (Investigative Reporter, Independent Freelance Journalist) in a recent article posed a very sobering question. At what point does America stop calling itself a ‘free country’? What prompted Leo to ask this fundamental question about freedom?
From the publisher's feed