
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Is it possible to remove the word “God” from all state constitutions and keep our constitutions unique from those changing constitutions (i.e. France) and our freedoms intact?
Recently a church in the Boston, MA area had their nativity scene on the front yard, they placed the baby Jesus in a cage (instead of in a cradle) to show support for open borders. Some of the parishioners in this church support the statement as a legitimate expression of religion to influence law while others were angry over the depiction of Jesus in a cage. Is this a legitimate way to attempt to influence public policy?
What is the difference in the definition of the terms traditional and secular’?
What is the Constitutional and historical perspective of the matter of religion and its influence on law and public policy?
How was the French experience different from the American experience? What did French historian Alexis de Tocqueville have to say about his visit to America?
Comparing the Traditional vs The Secular. We are joined by David New (Constitutional Attorney). Topics discussed include: The French Experience. “Religion” and its influence on the law. God and Government. Exemptions for the sake of conscious.
What simple guidelines and recommendations should people have about evaluating charitable organizations, their stated missions, and their actual actions?
How does it happen where an organization that states they are Christian can move so dramatically into a position where they end up supporting clearly unbiblical and unchristian positions?
In an article released by the Middle East Forum on Nov 27, 2018 on Giving Tuesday in an effort to warn people and their giving, this was stated, “Writing in the Christian Post on November 3, the Forum revealed the full extent of the role played by World Vision in a 2015 decision by the Obama administration to approve the transfer of $115,000 of taxpayers’ money to the Islamic Relief Agency (ISRA), which the U.S. government designated as a terrorist organization in 2004 because of its close links to Bin Laden. The Christian Post article followed a July 2018 report the Forum wrote in National Review first uncovering the scandal, which was covered by media all around the world.” What this July report about? What was the ‘scandal’ about which media around the world took note? How did World Vision respond to being called out in the article? Why should this type of information be made known to the public?
From the publisher's feed