Share STLR Conversations
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
This is the sixth and final episode in the special 2023 Symposium Edition Podcast of STLR Conversations. We are sharing the recordings of our Symposium titled “Accountability and Liability in Generative AI: Challenges and Perspectives."
Author: Alicia Solow-Niederman, Associate Professor of Law, The George Washington University Law School
Commentator: Shyamkrishna Balganesh, Sol Goldman Professor of Law, Columbia Law School
Moderator: Matthew Tracy, Columbia Law School, J.D. ’24
A link to slides will be posted here when available.
This is the fifth episode of six in the special 2023 Symposium Edition Podcast of STLR Conversations. We are sharing the recordings of our Symposium titled “Accountability and Liability in Generative AI: Challenges and Perspectives."
Author: Paul Ohm, Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center
Commentator: Timothy Wu, Julius Silver Professor of Law, Science and Technology, Columbia Law School
Moderator: Amanda Orbuch, Columbia Law School, J.D. ’24
A link to slides will be posted here when available.
This is the fourth episode of six in the special 2023 Symposium Edition Podcast of STLR Conversations. We are sharing the recordings of our Symposium titled “Accountability and Liability in Generative AI: Challenges and Perspectives."
Author: Catherine Sharkey, Segal Family Professor of Regulatory Law and Policy, NYU School of Law
Commentator: Thomas Merrill, Charles Evans Hughes Professor of Law, Columbia Law School
Moderator: Sarah Al-Shalash, Columbia Law School, J.D. ’24
A link to slides will be posted here when available.
This is the third episode of six in the special 2023 Symposium Edition Podcast of STLR Conversations. We are sharing the recordings of our Symposium titled “Accountability and Liability in Generative AI: Challenges and Perspectives."
Author: Alice Xiang, Global Head of AI Ethics at Sony
Commentator: Talia Gillis, Associate Professor of Law and Milton Handler Fellow, Columbia Law School
Moderator: Nancy Lu, Columbia Law School, J.D. ’24
A link to slides will be posted here when available.
This is the second episode of six in the special 2023 Symposium Edition Podcast of STLR Conversations. We are sharing the recordings of our Symposium titled “Accountability and Liability in Generative AI: Challenges and Perspectives."
Author: Mark Lemley, William H. Neukom Professor of Law, Stanford Law School
Commentator: Matthew Sag, Professor of Law and Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Data Science, Emory University School of Law
Moderator: Joshua Simmons, Partner, Kirkland & Ellis
A link to slides will be posted here when available.
This is the first episode of six in the special 2023 Symposium Edition Podcast of STLR Conversations. We are sharing the recordings of our Symposium titled “Accountability and Liability in Generative AI: Challenges and Perspectives."
Paper Author: Christopher Yoo, John H. Chestnut Professor of Law, Communication, and Computer & Information Science, University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School
Commentator: Eric Talley, Isidor and Seville Sulzbacher Professor of Law, Columbia Law School
Moderator: Abby Graegin, Columbia Law School, J.D. ’24
A link to slides will be posted here when available.
This week, FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr joins STLR host Mariam Kamal to discuss the natonal security concerns surrounding Tiktok. Commissioner Carr was appointed to the FCC in 2018 by former President Donald Trump. Recently, Comissioner Carr wrote a letter to Apple and Google urging them to remove Tiktok from their app stores and testified in Congress about Tiktok's security threat.
Before the interview, Mariam and co-host Ben Faber provide some background information on the Tiktok controversy and discuss why Comissioner Carr believes Tiktok is a threat to national security.
This week, Professor Lynisse Pantin joins STLR host Mariam Kamal to discuss the startup ecosyem and the challenges that minorities face when starting a company.
Professor Pantin is the founding director of the Entrepreneurship and Community Development Clinic at Columbia Law School and author of "The Wealth Gap and Racial Disparities in the Startup Ecosystem."
Should social media companies continue to rely on ex post standards to regulate what their users post? Or should platforms look to free speech jurisprudence to make these determinations? Are these companies publishers entitled to free speech protections? Or are they just platforms primarily concerned with hosting their users' content?
As this debate goes on, Evelyn Douek thinks this framing misses the point. Douek, of Harvard Law School and the Knight First Amendment Foundation, argues that a free-speech paradigm gives social media entities a possibly undeserved amount of authority to shape domestic and international events. Instead of trying to draw the line between "good" and "bad" speech, she recommends a systems level ex ante regulatory in which online platforms are treated as bureaucratic agencies and regulated using administrative law norms such as accountability and transparency.
You can find more about Evelyn Douek's work on her website, and you can follow her on Twitter.
The podcast currently has 19 episodes available.