The Earth has been around for 4.5 billion years, but humans have only called it home for 300,000 years, a period of time so brief that if we disappeared today it's unlikely that future species would ever know that we were here. So is it stupid to assume that there were civilizations that came before us? 

Stores across the street from each other, no foot traffic, low demand...how is Mattress Firm a viable business? And are the most insane explanations the least stupid?  

Forget gerrymandering, let's reset the entire map! Could many of the United States' most stupid problems be solved by simply resetting the map? And what are the least stupid ways that we could do it? 

In 1884 the case of "The Crown v. Dudley and Stephens," set the modern standard for how we view cannibalism as a society. As an expert on English caselaw, the infamous Rag Reynolds returns to the show to debate the finer points of the crossover between morality and necessity, and help us decide if there are any less stupid ways that we could utilize one of our most renewable resources...the dead. 

There has been a lot of talk on the show about the various types of future overloads that are likely to enslave humanity in the future, but what about the overlords that are already here? The guys pull out a magnifying glass to superheat the argument--Stupid/Not Stupid, Ants rule the world? 

On a topic that Jason clearly knows nothing about, the team breaks down what it would take to land humans on Mars in our lifetimes, and if all the hype is stupid, or not stupid? 

Somehow we made it to a second Halloween. This year we decide if ghosts are stupid or not, and what science has to say about it. 

9 went in, none came out...alive. Matt and Jason journey into the snowy crags of Dyatlov Pass to search for clues as to the fate of the ill-fated expedition. Especially stupid clues.