
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


CASE: Poche v Poche [2020] NSWSC 83
Brenda had two children, Adam and Wayne. In her Will, she left Adam 15% of her estate and she left the rest to Wayne.
Adam made a family provision application seeking a greater share of the estate.
There was a family history of swapping houses, a family business that was taken over by Adam, and legal disputes. But what made this case stand out in the sea of family provision cases, is the legal costs Adam incurred: $627,000!
The big question for me is: was it worth it?
By Tanya ChapmanCASE: Poche v Poche [2020] NSWSC 83
Brenda had two children, Adam and Wayne. In her Will, she left Adam 15% of her estate and she left the rest to Wayne.
Adam made a family provision application seeking a greater share of the estate.
There was a family history of swapping houses, a family business that was taken over by Adam, and legal disputes. But what made this case stand out in the sea of family provision cases, is the legal costs Adam incurred: $627,000!
The big question for me is: was it worth it?

37,595 Listeners

85 Listeners

21 Listeners

897 Listeners

759 Listeners

113,121 Listeners

1,331 Listeners

351 Listeners

534 Listeners

779 Listeners

1,314 Listeners

454 Listeners

907 Listeners

227 Listeners

2,536 Listeners