
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


CASE: Straede v Eastwood [2003] NSWSC 280
In August 2000, John Straede was driving his wife Cheryl to work. He overtook the car in front of him on a hill and collided with an oncoming vehicle. Cheryl was killed in the accident.
John pleaded guilty to dangerous driving causing death.
The question in this case was not whether John was guilty of causing Cheryl's death, it was whether he was still entitled to inherit from her estate.
John applied for relief from the forfeiture rule, the rule that states that a person shall not benefit from the death they have caused.
However, the case focused little on the car accident itself and more on the ménage à trois with another woman.
By Tanya ChapmanCASE: Straede v Eastwood [2003] NSWSC 280
In August 2000, John Straede was driving his wife Cheryl to work. He overtook the car in front of him on a hill and collided with an oncoming vehicle. Cheryl was killed in the accident.
John pleaded guilty to dangerous driving causing death.
The question in this case was not whether John was guilty of causing Cheryl's death, it was whether he was still entitled to inherit from her estate.
John applied for relief from the forfeiture rule, the rule that states that a person shall not benefit from the death they have caused.
However, the case focused little on the car accident itself and more on the ménage à trois with another woman.

22 Listeners

793 Listeners

641 Listeners

91 Listeners

230 Listeners

329 Listeners

43 Listeners

811 Listeners

35 Listeners

149 Listeners

47,945 Listeners

308 Listeners

44 Listeners

240 Listeners

381 Listeners