
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


CASE: Seymour v Seymour [2024] NSWSC 699
WARNING: disturbing content; DV.
In 1971, Terence Seymour became the father to a little boy named Mark Seymour. 3 years later, Terence left his family and had little contact with his son after that.
Fast forward to 1991 and Terence married Helen Mary Seymour. He was still married to Helen at the date of his death 31 years later in July 2022.
3 weeks before he died, Terence had made his last Will that left his entire estate to Helen.
Mark made an application seeking provision from his late father's estate.
What responsibility did Terence have to provide for the son he had left behind?
By Tanya ChapmanCASE: Seymour v Seymour [2024] NSWSC 699
WARNING: disturbing content; DV.
In 1971, Terence Seymour became the father to a little boy named Mark Seymour. 3 years later, Terence left his family and had little contact with his son after that.
Fast forward to 1991 and Terence married Helen Mary Seymour. He was still married to Helen at the date of his death 31 years later in July 2022.
3 weeks before he died, Terence had made his last Will that left his entire estate to Helen.
Mark made an application seeking provision from his late father's estate.
What responsibility did Terence have to provide for the son he had left behind?

37,636 Listeners

86 Listeners

25 Listeners

785 Listeners

752 Listeners

111,948 Listeners

1,276 Listeners

307 Listeners

484 Listeners

720 Listeners

1,183 Listeners

386 Listeners

805 Listeners

239 Listeners

2,300 Listeners