
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


CASE: Seymour v Seymour [2024] NSWSC 699
WARNING: disturbing content; DV.
In 1971, Terence Seymour became the father to a little boy named Mark Seymour. 3 years later, Terence left his family and had little contact with his son after that.
Fast forward to 1991 and Terence married Helen Mary Seymour. He was still married to Helen at the date of his death 31 years later in July 2022.
3 weeks before he died, Terence had made his last Will that left his entire estate to Helen.
Mark made an application seeking provision from his late father's estate.
What responsibility did Terence have to provide for the son he had left behind?
By Tanya ChapmanCASE: Seymour v Seymour [2024] NSWSC 699
WARNING: disturbing content; DV.
In 1971, Terence Seymour became the father to a little boy named Mark Seymour. 3 years later, Terence left his family and had little contact with his son after that.
Fast forward to 1991 and Terence married Helen Mary Seymour. He was still married to Helen at the date of his death 31 years later in July 2022.
3 weeks before he died, Terence had made his last Will that left his entire estate to Helen.
Mark made an application seeking provision from his late father's estate.
What responsibility did Terence have to provide for the son he had left behind?

37,595 Listeners

85 Listeners

21 Listeners

897 Listeners

759 Listeners

113,121 Listeners

1,331 Listeners

351 Listeners

534 Listeners

779 Listeners

1,314 Listeners

454 Listeners

907 Listeners

227 Listeners

2,536 Listeners