summary - האיגוד הישראלי לרפואה דחופה

summary - האיגוד הישראלי לרפואה דחופה

By summary – האיגוד הישראלי לרפואה דחופהMedicineHealth & Fitness
Download on the App Store

summary - האיגוד הישראלי לרפואה דחופה episodes

  • PODCAST: EM Quick Hits 72 EMC²: Peds Neurocritical Care, Pulmonary Hypertension, Cytokine Release Syndrome, Peds Wrist Fracture, Bradycardia ECG Interpretation, Coaching the EM Mind Part 2
    “This learning material is sourced from Emergency Medicine Cases  and has been published here with permission as per Creative Commons copyright.”
    Topics in this EM Quick Hits podcast

    Amna Karabegovic on a case of pediatric altered LOA and neurocritical care review (2:09)

    Anand Swaminathan on management of pulmonary hypertension and RV failure (24:32)

    Brit Long on cytokine release syndrome (30:44)

    Andrew Tagg on management of pediatric distal radius fractures (39:31)

    Jesse McLaren on ECG interpretation for the bradycardic patient (46:05)

    Sara Gray & Katie Lin on Coaching the EM Mind Part 2: stress management and optimizing safety on shift (52:55)

    Podcast production, editing and sound design by Anton Helman

    Podcast content, written summary & blog post by Sara Brade, edited by Anton Helman, July, 2026

    Cite this podcast as: Helman, A. Lin, K. Karabegovic, A. Swaminathan, A. Long, B. Tagg, A. McLaren, J. Gray, S. EM Quick Hits 72 – EMC²: Peds Neurocritical Care, Pulmonary Hypertension, Cytokine Release Syndrome, Peds Wrist Fracture, Bradycardia ECG Interpretation, Coaching the EM Mind Part 2 Emergency Medicine Cases. July, 2026. https://emergencymedicinecases.com/em-quick-hits-72-july-2026/ ‎. Accessed August 16, 2026.

    EM Cases Cases (EMC²): Pediatric Neurocritical Care
    A previously healthy five-year-old presented with headache, vomiting and a rapidly depressed level of consciousness. CT showed extensive intracranial and intraventricular hemorrhage with hydrocephalus and cerebral edema, ultimately attributed to an arteriovenous malformation. This case highlights the nuances of ED management of the neurocritical pediatric patient.

    Rapid neurologic assessment and differential diagnosis for the altered pediatric patient

    In the crashing child suspected of neurologic catastrophy, focus on the essential neurologic exam: eyes/pupils, verbal response and motor response.

    AVPU—Alert, responds to Voice, responds to Pain, Unresponsive—can provide a fast common language when calculating an exact GCS is impractical, and correlates well with GCS.

    • Organize the differential into structural versus metabolic causes. Check glucose, temperature and vital signs immediately, but maintain a low threshold for urgent head CT when the clinical picture points towards a structural emergency (i.e. headache, vomiting and markedly depressed consciousness).
    • Appropriate CT should not be delayed solely because the patient is a child who is at risk from radiation exposure when the presentation is life-threatening and the result will change immediate management.
    • Immediate management priorities in a child with raised intracranial pressure (ICP)
      • Elevate the head of the bed and keep the neck midline; provide adequate analgesia and antiemetic therapy.
      • Maintain oxygenation, normothermia, euglycemia and euvolemia with isotonic fluid. Avoid hypoxia and hypotension, both of which worsen secondary brain injury.
      • For suspected pediatric intracranial hypertension, 3% hypertonic saline is the preferred first-line hyperosmolar therapy: an easy memory aid is 3% saline at 3 mL/kg IV.
      • Mannitol remains an alternative when hypertonic saline is unavailable, but monitor closely for osmotic diuresis, hypovolemia and electrolyte abnormalities.
      • Pediatric neurocritical airway management considerations
        • Aim for first-pass success with the most experienced available operator, video laryngoscopy, full preoxygenation and a clearly communicated backup plan.
        • Minimize hypoxemia and hemodynamic swings during airway management. Laryngoscopy-related bradycardia in children is often driven by hypoxia; preventing desaturation is more important than routine atropine pretreatment.
        • Have atropine and epinephrine immediately available. Atropine is not routinely required for pediatric RSI, but may be considered in selected infants (age <1 yr) or when significant bradycardia is already present.
        • Use age-specific blood pressure ranges, avoid hypotension and seek pediatric ICU guidance for hypertension. Evidence-based BP targets for spontaneous pediatric ICH remain limited. The priorities are to avoid hypotension and maintain cerebral perfusion while generally avoiding blood pressure above approximately the 95th percentile for the child’s age, sex and size.
        • Expand to view reference list
          Inhaled nitroglycerine for pulmonary hypertension and RV failure

          Patients with acute pulmonary hypertension—from a large pulmonary embolism or decompensated chronic pulmonary arterial hypertension—can deteriorate rapidly when right-ventricular preload falls or RV afterload rises. The immediate goal is to improve oxygenation and ventilation while avoiding interventions that precipitate RV collapse.

          Initial respiratory support of patients with pulmonary hypertension in the ED
          • Correct hypoxemia and hypercarbia because both increase pulmonary vascular resistance. Avoid endotracheal intubation when a reasonable alternative exists. Transition to invasive positive-pressure ventilation can reduce venous return, increase RV afterload and trigger abrupt hemodynamic collapse.
          • Bi-level non-invasive ventilation (BPAP) may improve oxygenation and lower CO2 while preserving some spontaneous negative-pressure breathing. High-flow nasal oxygen is reasonable when hypoxemia is the main issue, but it will not reliably correct substantial hypercarbia.
          • Inhaled nitroglycerine as pulmonary vasodilator in the ED for pulmonary hypertension
            • Inhaled nitric oxide is a classic rapid pulmonary vasodilator, but it may not be immediately available in the ED. Inhaled epoprostenol is another option, although pharmacy preparation and delivery can introduce clinically important delays.
            • A practical bridge is using nebulized nitroglycerin while waiting for inhaled nitric oxide or epoprostenol. Nitroglycerin is rapidly converted into nitric oxide in the lungs. The suggested dose is 5 mg by nebulizer every 5 minutes. Practically, it is difficult to fit 5mg into the nebulizer chamber so our expert suggests filling the chamber with nitroglycerin and increasing flow rate to max. This is an off-label, time-critical strategy that should be aligned with local critical-care, respiratory-therapy and pharmacy protocols.
            • EM Cases Crit Cases 7 – Pulmonary Hypertension – A Fine Balance

              Expand to view reference list

               

              Recognition and management of Cytokine Release Syndrome after CAR T-cell therapy

              Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) is a severe systemic inflammatory response caused by a rapid surge of cytokines. It is increasingly encountered after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy and may range from a mild influenza-like illness to shock, hypoxic respiratory failure and multiorgan dysfunction. Other triggers include: monoclonal antibodies, haploidentical donor stem cell transplantation, and nonprotein cancer drugs.

              CAR T-cell therapy uses genetically modified T cells to attack malignant cells and it is used to treat cancers like ALL, CLL, and multiple myeloma. Examples include:

                • Tisagenlecleucel (KYMRIAH)
                • Axicabtagene ciloleucel (YESCARTA)
                • Brexucabtagene autoleucel (TECARTUS)
                • Lisocabtagene maraleucel (BREYANZI)
                • Idecabtagene vicleucel (ABECMA)
                • Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (CARVYKTI)
                • Consider CRS when a patient within two weeks of CAR T-cell therapy has a fever of at least 38°C that is not better explained by another cause, together with constitutional symptoms, hypotension or hypoxia. There is no single diagnostic ED laboratory or imaging test. Evaluate simultaneously for sepsis, tumour lysis syndrome, pulmonary embolism, heart failure and treatment-related organ injury.

                  ED management of CRS

                  • Resuscitate with judicious fluids, supplemental oxygen and vasopressors as required. Provide antipyretics. Evaluate and treat end-organ dysfunction.
                  • Because sepsis may be indistinguishable at presentation, give broad-spectrum antibiotics when the patient is significantly ill or infection remains plausible.
                  • Contact the treating oncologist or cellular-therapy team early, regardless of severity of illness.
                  • Treatment with tocilizumab, an IL-6 receptor antagonist may be considered under specialist guidance.
                  • Severe or refractory CRS may require corticosteroids.
                  • Bottom line: A recent CAR T-cell infusion (within last 2 weeks) plus otherwise unexplained fever, hypotension or hypoxia should immediately raise CRS. Resuscitate, cover possible infection and involve the oncology/cellular-therapy team early—specific therapy is time-sensitive.

                     

                    Expand to view reference list
                    Management of pediatric displaced distal radius fractures: the CRAFFT Trial

                    A completely displaced pediatric wrist looks alarming and traditionally prompts reduction under sedation or general anesthesia, sometimes with fixation. The CRAFFT trial asked whether immediate anatomic correction improves outcomes that matter to children and families—or whether casting alone allows sufficient remodeling.

                    The paper: Perry DC, Zimmermann A, Achten J, et al. Non-surgical casting versus surgical reduction for children with severely displaced distal radial fractures (the CRAFFT Study): a multicentre, randomised, controlled non-inferiority trial and economic evaluation. The Lancet. Published online April 8, 2026.

                    PICO:

                    Population: 750 children aged 4–10 years with severely displaced distal radial fractures across 49 UK hospitals; 44% had completely off-ended fractures. Intervention: casting without purposeful manipulation, general anesthesia or procedural sedation. Comparison: surgical (closed or open) reduction under general anesthesia or conscious sedation, with fixation permitted at the surgeon’s discretion. Primary outcome: parent-reported PROMIS upper-extremity function at three months. The prespecified non-inferiority margin was −2.5 points.

                    Results:

                      • At three months, surgery produced a small functional advantage: adjusted mean difference 1.64 PROMIS points in favour of reduction.
                      • The confidence interval crossed the conservative non-inferiority margin, so casting did not technically demonstrate non-inferiority for the primary analysis.
                      • The observed difference was below the magnitude families considered meaningful enough to justify surgery, and there was no functional difference by six or twelve months.
                      • Early procedural complications—including pressure injury, wound infection, scarring and nerve irritation—occurred mainly in the surgical group. Refracture was slightly more frequent with casting but remained uncommon overall.
                      • Casting saved approximately £1,665 per patient and had a 100% probability of being cost-effective at the UK thresholds studied.
                      • Limitations and application:

                          • Treatment was unblinded and the primary outcome was parent reported, so expectation may have influenced early scores.
                          • The pragmatic design allowed variation in treatment technique and crossover, although this also improves real-world relevance.
                          • The clearest application is to children aged 4–10 years. Results should not be extrapolated automatically to older children approaching skeletal maturity.
                          • The trial does not support cast-first care when there is neurovascular compromise, threatened skin, an open or intra-articular fracture, or another reason for urgent reduction.
                          • Implementation should be collaborative with local orthopedic teams because practice patterns and thresholds for intervention vary.
                          • Bottom line: For most children aged 4–10 years with a severely displaced distal radius fracture, an intact neurovascular exam and no skin threat, a cast-first strategy is a reasonable default—even when the X-ray looks dramatic. Treat the child’s function and safety, not the radiograph alone.

                             

                            Expand to view reference list
                            Bradycardia and the 12-lead ECG: A systematic approach and BRADI mnemonic

                            ACLS is designed to stabilize primary electrical bradyarrhythmias, but many ED patients are bradycardic because of a secondary, reversible process. The rhythm strip tells you what the rate and rhythm are; the history, vital signs and full 12-lead ECG may tell you why.

                            The BRADI mnemonic for reversible causes of bradycardia in the ED

                            B – BRASH syndrome and hyperkalemia: Think renal dysfunction, AV-nodal blockers, shock and hyperkalemia. Hyperkalemic bradycardia may be sinus or junctional and may show PR prolongation, QRS widening, axis change or peaked T waves. Atropine and pacing may fail; treat suspected hyperkalemia promptly, including empiric calcium when the clinical and ECG picture fits.

                            R – Reduced vital signs: Check the complete set: oxygen saturation, glucose and temperature. Hypoxia and hypoglycemia require immediate correction. Hypothermia may produce bradycardia, shivering artifact, prolonged intervals and prominent J waves.

                            A – Acute coronary occlusion: The left circumflex perfuses the SA node as well as the lateral and posterior territories, while the RCA perfuses the SA and AV nodes as well as the inferior and posterior territories. In a patient with ischemic symptoms and bradycardia, look for signs of inferior, lateral or posterior occlusion: inferior ST elevation or hyperacute T waves, reciprocal change in aVL, or anterior ST depression reciprocal to posterior injury.

                            D – Drugs: Consider beta-blockers, calcium-channel blockers, digoxin, opioids and medication accumulation from renal failure. Management may require antidotal or supportive therapy, withholding the culprit drug and allowing clearance. Digoxin may produce a shortened QT interval and scooped ST depression, but most drug causes are identified primarily by history.

                            I – Intracranial pressure (raised) or infection: Raised ICP is primarily a clinical diagnosis, although diffuse deep T-wave inversion and QT prolongation may occur. Lyme carditis may cause high-grade or complete AV block and is a reversible reason to avoid an unnecessary permanent pacemaker.

                            Bottom line: Stabilize the unstable patient, but do not stop at atropine, epinephrine or pacing. Ask why the patient is bradycardic and use the 12-lead ECG most actively when hyperkalemia or acute coronary occlusion is plausible.

                            For examples of the BRADI mnemonic, ECG Cases 58.

                            Coaching the EM Mind Part 2: Stress management and optimizing safety on shift

                            Emergency medicine exposes clinicians to recurring high-stress situations, from critically ill patients and overcrowded departments to challenging interactions with patients, families and colleagues. Stress cannot—and should not—be eliminated entirely. A moderate level of stress can improve energy, focus and performance, while excessive stress can produce panic, cognitive overload and impaired decision-making. The goal is to recognize when stress is moving outside the optimal performance zone and develop practical strategies that can be used before, during and after challenging encounters.

                            Clues to recognizing when stress is becoming excessive for emergency clinicians

                            Clinicians may not immediately recognize that they have entered a state of cognitive or emotional overload. Warning signs include:

                            • Irritability, raising your voice or snapping at others
                            • Difficulty prioritizing patients or making decisions
                            • Feeling unable to absorb one more task or complication
                            • Changes in sleep, nutrition or exercise habits
                            • Withdrawing from activities that are normally enjoyable
                            • Stress from work increasingly affecting home life
                            • Colleagues and family members may recognize these changes before the clinician does. Treat these observations as an opportunity to pause and reassess rather than as criticism.

                              Four strategies for managing stress in the moment during a busy shift or a stressful encounter in the ED
                              1. 1Take a brief break – Even a one- or two-minute pause can improve cognitive bandwidth. Step away when it is safe, drink water, use the bathroom or briefly find a quieter space before returning to the department.
                              2. 2Use controlled breathing – Box breathing is one option. The specific technique matters less than practising it regularly. Breathing exercises become more useful during emergencies when they have already been rehearsed in lower-stress settings.
                              3. Ground yourself physically – Brief grounding exercises redirect attention to the present moment. Examples include intentionally pressing both feet into the floor, noticing the sensation of standing or clasping the hands together. These exercises can be performed discreetly during resuscitations, difficult conversations or other emotionally charged situations.
                              4. Develop positive self-talk – Choose a brief phrase that promotes confidence and focus, such as: “I’ve got this.” “We can do this.” “You can do hard things.” “I am ready.” Positive self-talk can also be directed toward the team: “We are well trained for this. Let’s make a plan.”
                              5. How to prepare yourself and the team before a stressful resuscitation in the ED

                                When time permits:

                                • Walk rather than run to the resuscitation room.
                                • Use controlled breathing on the way.
                                • Repeat your positive self-talk phrase.
                                • Ground yourself physically when you arrive.
                                • Conduct a clear pre-brief and establish a shared plan.
                                • Use calm, confident communication to set the emotional tone
                                • Tools for verbally de-escalating emotionally charged encounters in the ED

                                  The most important principle is to avoid adding more emotion to the interaction.

                                  Practical strategies include:

                                  • Speak slightly slower and more quietly.
                                  • Take an intentional breath and pause before responding.
                                  • Name and validate the emotion: “I can see that you are frustrated.”
                                  • Reorient everyone around a shared goal: “We both want the best outcome for this patient.”
                                  • Use collaborative language such as “we” and “together.”
                                  • Avoid blame, personal attacks and accusatory statements.
                                  • The objective is not necessarily to agree with the other person. It is to lower the emotional temperature enough to return to productive problem-solving.

                                    Speaking up when patient safety is threatened in the ED

                                    Use progressively assertive safety-escalation language:

                                    1. “I notice…”
                                    2. State the objective observation: “I notice the oxygen saturation is 82%.”
                                    3. “I wonder…”
                                    4. Suggest a possible action: “I wonder whether we should apply a non-rebreather mask.”
                                    5. “I’m worried…”
                                    6. Clearly state your concern: “I’m worried that this patient is critically hypoxic.”
                                    7. “This is now a safety concern…”
                                    8. Become direct and declarative when immediate action is required: “This is now a safety concern. We need to address the airway.”

                                      This structure allows concerns to be raised respectfully while ensuring that escalating danger is communicated clearly.

                                      Strategies to recover after a difficult case in the ED

                                      The effects of a stressful resuscitation may continue long after the event is over. Immediate recovery strategies include:

                                      • Conduct a short team debrief.
                                      • Speak with a trusted colleague or friend.
                                      • Take a brief break before seeing the next patient.
                                      • Drink water, eat something or attend to another basic need.
                                      • Seek physical comfort or support when appropriate.
                                      • Arrange a later cold debrief or peer-support follow-up.
                                      • Consider whether continuing the shift is safe.
                                      • Some events—including physical assault or an exceptionally distressing clinical event—may leave a clinician temporarily unable to provide safe care. Departments should have clear processes for obtaining coverage and stepping away when necessary.

                                        Creating transitions between work and home for emergency physicians to improve wellbeing
                                        • At the end of a shift, intentionally recognize three things that went well, even if the shift was otherwise difficult. Use the commute home to decompress through music, a supportive podcast or a conversation with a trusted colleague.
                                        • Before entering the home, take enough time to transition mentally from the clinician role to the role you want to occupy with family and friends.
                                        • A pre-shift routine can provide the opposite transition. Arriving early, listening to educational or motivating material, reviewing why the work matters or using a consistent “walk-on” song can help place the mind into work mode.
                                        • Deep dive on pre-shift strategies: Episode 134 Shift Preparation: Pre-gaming with Rob Orman

                                          How emergency departments can support clinician safety on- and off-shift

                                          Stress management should not be treated solely as an individual responsibility. Emergency departments should consider:

                                          • Regular, interprofessional de-escalation training
                                          • Training clinicians and nurses to lead hot and cold debriefs
                                          • Clear policies following physical or verbal assault
                                          • Processes for obtaining shift coverage after critical events
                                          • Return-to-work support after major incidents
                                          • Accessible and confidential peer-support programs
                                          • Bottom line: Stress-management skills are most useful when they are practised before they are urgently needed. Develop brief techniques through regular practice—breathing, grounding, positive self-talk and safety-escalation language—and use them regularly until they become automatic. Pause, reset and reframe before, during and after stressful encounters. A few deliberate seconds can improve emotional regulation, team communication, clinical performance and safety for both clinicians and patients.

                                            Expand to view reference list
                                            1. Groombridge CJ, Maini A, Ayton D, et al. Emergency physicians’ experience of stress during resuscitation and strategies for mitigating the effects of stress on performance. Emerg Med J. 2022;39(11):839–846. doi:10.1136/emermed-2021-211280.
                                            2. Skutezky T, Small SS, Peddie D, Balka E, Hohl CM. Beliefs and perceptions of patient safety event reporting in a Canadian emergency department: a qualitative study. Can J Emerg Med. 2022;24:867–875. doi:10.1007/s43678-022-00400-2.
                                            3. Richmond JS, Berlin JS, Fishkind AB, et al. Verbal de-escalation of the agitated patient: consensus statement of the American Association for Emergency Psychiatry Project BETA De-escalation Workgroup. West J Emerg Med. 2012;13(1):17–25. doi:10.5811/westjem.2011.9.6864.
                                            4. The post PODCAST: EM Quick Hits 72 EMC²: Peds Neurocritical Care, Pulmonary Hypertension, Cytokine Release Syndrome, Peds Wrist Fracture, Bradycardia ECG Interpretation, Coaching the EM Mind Part 2 first appeared on האיגוד הישראלי לרפואה דחופה.

                                              1 hr 39 min
                                            5. PODCAST: July 2026 Annals of Emergency Medicine by Annals of Emergency Medicine

                                              On the July episode of the Annals of Emergency Medicine podcast, Ryan and Rory discuss social vulnerability in EMS recognition, ED social care approaches, pediatric prehospital readiness, and much more.

                                              The post PODCAST: July 2026 Annals of Emergency Medicine by Annals of Emergency Medicine first appeared on האיגוד הישראלי לרפואה דחופה.

                                              30 min
                                            6. PODCAST: EM Quick Hits 71 EMC²: Fever Without a Source, Coaching the EM Mind Part 1, Traumatic Pneumothorax Part 2, PECARN C-spine Rule, Medetomidine Withdrawal, EMS Handover
                                              “This learning material is sourced from Emergency Medicine Cases  and has been published here with permission as per Creative Commons copyright.” 
                                              Topics in this EM Quick Hits podcast

                                              Kate Lazier on a case of fever without a source (1:13)

                                              Andrew Petrosoniak on chest tubes in trauma part 2 (15:59)

                                              Adrianna Roweon the challenges of recognition and management of medetomidine withdrawal (28:49)

                                              Justin Morgensternon why the PECARN c-spine rule may be dangerous (36:19)

                                              Zach Cantor on paramedic handover done right (48:45)

                                              Sara Gray & Katie Lin on coaching the em mind part 1: physiology – sleep, nutrition and exercise (59:16)

                                              Podcast production, editing and sound design by Anton Helman

                                              Podcast content, written summary & blog post by Anton Helman, March, 2026

                                              Cite this podcast as: Helman, A. Lin, K. Lazier, K. Petrosoniak, A. Morgenstern J. Cantor, Z. Gray, S. EM Quick Hits 71 – EMC²: Fever Without a Source, Coaching the EM Mind Part 1, Traumatic Pneumothorax Part 2, PECARN C-spine Rule, Medetomidine Withdrawal, EMS Handover. March, 2026. https://emergencymedicinecases.com/em-quick-hits-march-2026/. Accessed March 11, 2026.

                                              EM Cases Cases (EMC²): Fever Without an Obvious Source and Fever of Unknown Origin – Don’t Miss the Treatable Diagnoses!

                                              • When evaluating fever without a clear source, prioritize treatable, life/limb/vision-threatening diagnoses especially ones that are easy to miss.
                                              • Address epidemiologic risk factors including travel, sexual exposure, immunocompromised states, outdoor exposures, and substance use, as these may significantly narrow the diagnostic differential.
                                              • High-risk infectious diagnoses to consider

                                                • Endocarditis
                                                • Meningitis
                                                • Spinal epidural abscess
                                                • Occult abscesses
                                                • Inflammatory diagnoses

                                                  • Giant cell arteritis and other vasculitites

                                                    Malignancy

                                                    • Leukemia / blast crisis

                                                      Toxicologic / endocrine diagnoses

                                                      • Serotonin syndrome
                                                      • Neuroleptic malignant syndrome
                                                      • Alcohol withdrawal
                                                      • Stimulant intoxication
                                                      • Thyroid storm
                                                      • Adrenal insufficiency
                                                      • Salicylate toxicity
                                                      • West Nile Virus pearls

                                                        • Endemic in Canada for ~20 years
                                                        • Most infections asymptomatic
                                                        • Symptomatic cases → fever + malaise
                                                        • Severe cases → encephalitis, flaccid paralysis, Parkinsonian features
                                                        • Treatment is supportive
                                                        • Fever of Unknown Origin (as apposed to Fever Without a Source)

                                                          • Defined as ≥38.3°C for ≥3 weeks
                                                          • Up to 50% never receive a diagnosis, with most of these patients ultimately doing well
                                                          • Ensure appropriate follow-up if discharged
                                                          • Traumatic Pneumothorax Part 2: Chest Tube Decision Pearls

                                                            If you haven’t already, listen to Part 1 first where Dr. Petrosoniak talks about the following…

                                                            Needle Decompression in the ED for traumatic pneumothorax

                                                            • Needle decompression is increasingly recognized as unreliable in the emergency department because chest wall thickness often exceeds the length of standard angiocatheters, resulting in frequent failure to enter the pleural space and delaying definitive treatment.
                                                            • Even when performed in the lateral chest (4th–5th intercostal space), success remains unpredictable; therefore critically ill trauma patients should not rely on this temporizing maneuver when definitive decompression is required.
                                                            • In unstable patients with suspected tension physiology, the preferred approach is immediate finger thoracostomy followed by insertion of a large-bore surgical chest tube, while needle decompression may still have a limited role in prehospital or resource-limited settings where tube thoracostomy cannot be performed.
                                                            • Physiology-First Approach to Traumatic Pneumothorax

                                                              • Management should begin with physiologic risk stratification, categorizing patients as peri-arrest, unstable, or stable, as physiology determines urgency of intervention, imaging strategy, and chest tube selection as outlined in Part 1.
                                                              • Peri-arrest or unstable patients, such as those with hypoxia or hypotension after chest trauma, require immediate decompression with finger thoracostomy and placement of a large-bore chest tube (typically 24–28 Fr), recognizing that classic signs of tension pneumothorax are often late and that bedside ultrasound demonstrating absent lung sliding in an unstable patient should prompt rapid intervention.
                                                              • Stable patients may be managed more selectively with imaging and clinical integration; pigtail catheters are increasingly used for isolated traumatic pneumothorax in stable patients, although large-bore tubes remain appropriate in more complex trauma or when hemothorax is suspected.
                                                              •  

                                                                Expand to view reference list

                                                                 

                                                                Medetomidine Withdrawal: A New and Challenging Withdrawal Syndrome to Recognize and Manage

                                                                Medetomidine, a veterinary sedative and potent non-selective alpha-2 adrenergic agonist pharmacologically similar to clonidine and dexmedetomidine, has increasingly been identified as an adulterant in the unregulated opioid supply and is now emerging as an important cause of withdrawal syndromes presenting to emergency departments.

                                                                Acute toxicity from alpha-2 agonists typically produces sedation and sinus bradycardia, and although naloxone may reverse concomitant opioid-induced respiratory depression, it does not reverse sedation related to alpha-2 agonists or benzodiazepines that may also be present in contaminated drug supplies.

                                                                The more challenging clinical presentation is medetomidine withdrawal…

                                                                Medetomidine Withdrawal Syndrome (can begin within 6 hours)

                                                                Key features:

                                                                • Severe tachycardia
                                                                • Severe hypertension
                                                                • Mydriasis
                                                                • Hypoactive delirium
                                                                • Intractable vomiting
                                                                • Complications reported:

                                                                  • Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES)
                                                                  • Myocardial injury
                                                                  • Hypokalemia
                                                                  • Lactic acidosis
                                                                  • When to Suspect Medetomidine Withdrawal

                                                                    Patients using unregulated drugs with:

                                                                    • Severe HTN/tachycardia refractory to opioid withdrawal treatment
                                                                    • Prominent vomiting
                                                                    • Hypoactive delirium
                                                                    • Symptoms beginning within 24 hrs of last use
                                                                    • Treatment of Medetomidine Withdrawal

                                                                      The goal of medetomidine withdrawal treatment is to restore alpha-2 agonism

                                                                      First line (if oral tolerated):

                                                                      Clonidine

                                                                      • Mild symptoms: 0.1–0.2 mg PO
                                                                      • Severe symptoms: 0.3–0.5 mg PO
                                                                      • Repeat every 2–4 hrs
                                                                      • If refractory or cannot take PO:

                                                                        Dexmedetomidine infusion

                                                                        • Start 0.2–0.5 mcg/kg/hr
                                                                        • Titrate every 30 min
                                                                        • Loading dose 1 mcg/kg may be used in severe cases
                                                                        • Antiemetic choices in management of medetomidine withdrawal

                                                                          Use antidopaminergic agents

                                                                          • Metoclopramide
                                                                          • Prochlorperazine
                                                                          • Note that ondansetron is often ineffective.

                                                                             

                                                                            Expand to view reference list

                                                                             

                                                                            Pediatric PECARN C-Spine Rule: Important Study, Limited Clinical Application

                                                                            A recent multicenter study derived and validated a pediatric c-spine decision rule for children with blunt trauma presenting to trauma centers, identifying several high-risk clinical features associated with a substantially increased likelihood of cervical spine injury.

                                                                            High-risk findings include:

                                                                            • severely depressed consciousness,
                                                                            • unresponsiveness,
                                                                            • need for airway, breathing, or circulatory intervention, and
                                                                            • focal neurologic deficit
                                                                            • Additional intermediate-risk features include:

                                                                              • self-reported neck pain,
                                                                              • altered mental status,
                                                                              • substantial head or torso trauma, and
                                                                              • neck tenderness on examination.
                                                                              • Despite the methodological riggor of the study, the resulting rule demonstrates only moderate sensitivity, raising concern that a clinically meaningful proportion of injuries could be missed, while the positive predictive value remains extremely low given the rarity of cervical spine injury even in high-risk trauma populations.

                                                                                Importantly, the rule was derived in pediatric trauma center cohorts with far higher baseline imaging rates than most emergency departments, and has not yet undergone adequate external validation, comparison with clinician judgment, or implementation studies assessing its real-world impact on imaging practices.

                                                                                In the opinion of our guest expert, routine application of the rule outside highly selected trauma settings may paradoxically increase cervical spine imaging, potentially exposing large numbers of children to unnecessary radiation without improving diagnostic accuracy.

                                                                                 

                                                                                Expand to view reference list

                                                                                 

                                                                                IMIST-AMBO – Structured EMS Handover: A Critical Patient Safety Intervention

                                                                                Communication during prehospital-to-emergency department handover represents a critical but frequently under-recognized patient safety intervention, with observational studies demonstrating substantial information loss during transitions of care.

                                                                                Research suggests that a significant proportion of key clinical information is either omitted or not retained during handover, with frequent interruptions, parallel conversations, and premature patient transfer contributing to incomplete communication and potential downstream impacts on patient care.

                                                                                Evidence consistently demonstrates that handovers are most effective when they are brief, structured, and delivered before patient transfer, allowing receiving teams to focus attention on the information being communicated.

                                                                                The IMIST-AMBO framework provides a standardized structure for handover:

                                                                                IMIST

                                                                                • I – Identification
                                                                                • M – Mechanism/medical complaint
                                                                                • I – Injuries / information
                                                                                • S – Signs (vitals, GCS)
                                                                                • T – Treatments and trends
                                                                                • AMBO

                                                                                  • A – Allergies
                                                                                  • M – Medications
                                                                                  • B – Background
                                                                                  • O – Other relevant information
                                                                                  • EMS Handover Pearls
                                                                                    • Begin before moving the patient off of the EMS stretcher and onto the ED stretcher
                                                                                    • Ensure hands off, eyes on to whomever is speaking
                                                                                    • Identify who is receiving report and silence the room otherwise
                                                                                    • Use a structured format every time
                                                                                    • Keep it short (~60 seconds)
                                                                                    • Bottom Line -> Better EMS handover → fewer interruptions, clearer communication, improved patient care.

                                                                                       

                                                                                      Expand to view reference list
                                                                                      Coaching the EM Mind Part1: Physiology – Sleep, Nutrition & Exercise

                                                                                      Emergency medicine places clinicians in a uniquely demanding cognitive and physiologic environment characterized by shift work, sleep disruption, high cognitive load, and repeated exposure to emotionally stressful situations. Over time, these stressors can degrade both clinical performance and personal wellbeing, making deliberate attention to physiologic needs an essential component of professional sustainability.

                                                                                      Emergency medicine practice exposes clinicians to sustained physiologic and psychological stressors, particularly related to shift work, which is associated with increased risk of metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, malignancy, and mental health disorders.

                                                                                      In addition to long-term health risks, sleep disruption from rotating shift schedules impairs cognitive performance, concentration, reaction time, and clinical decision-making, with fatigue-related motor vehicle collisions representing an additional hazard during post-shift commutes.

                                                                                      Strategies to mitigate these effects include:

                                                                                      Recognizing Early Warning Signs

                                                                                      Early indicators of declining resilience often emerge in four physiologic domains: sleep, physical conditioning, nutrition, and stress regulation. Warning signs may include falling asleep during commutes or routine activities, progressive deterioration in physical fitness or health metrics, irregular or inadequate nutrition during shifts, and increasing feelings of overwhelm, irritability, or dread before work. Importantly, these changes often develop gradually and may be more readily recognized by colleagues or family members before clinicians recognize them themselves.

                                                                                      Scheduling Strategies to Mitigate Circadian Disruption

                                                                                      Several evidence-informed scheduling principles may help mitigate these effects. Whenever feasible, schedules should incorporate flexibility that allows clinicians to align shifts with their chronotype, recognizing that individuals naturally differ in their sleep–wake preferences.

                                                                                      • Forward-rotating schedules (day to evening to night) are generally better tolerated than backward rotation, as they align more closely with natural circadian adjustment.
                                                                                      • Shorter shifts—often seven to eight hours—may reduce cognitive fatigue and error rates, while adequate recovery time between shifts, ideally more than eleven hours, allows for meaningful physiologic restoration.
                                                                                      • Transparent and equitable scheduling practices further support psychological wellbeing by reinforcing fairness and professional agency.
                                                                                      • Optimizing Sleep for Shift Workers

                                                                                        Because sleep disruption is unavoidable in emergency medicine, clinicians benefit from intentionally optimizing sleep environments and routines. Practical measures include maintaining a dark, cool, and quiet sleeping environment, using blackout blinds, eye masks, earplugs, and white-noise devices when necessary. Strategic pre-shift napping before night shifts, minimizing caffeine intake in the hours preceding sleep, and limiting exposure to bright light before planned sleep periods may also improve sleep quality. Developing consistent routines around sleep—even when schedules vary—can significantly improve restorative sleep over time.

                                                                                        Episode 207 Deep dive into sleep strategies for shift workers

                                                                                        Exercise and Cognitive Performance

                                                                                        Regular physical activity plays a critical role in maintaining both physical and cognitive resilience. Exercise has been shown to improve attention, memory, mood regulation, and stress tolerance, while also reducing long-term risks of cardiovascular disease and dementia. Even modest and consistent exercise routines—such as brief daily workouts or incorporating activity into existing routines—can yield meaningful physiologic and psychological benefits. Importantly, sustainable habits often begin with small, achievable goals rather than ambitious but unsustainable lifestyle changes.

                                                                                        Nutrition and Cognitive Function

                                                                                        Nutrition is an often overlooked determinant of physician performance, yet it plays a critical role in maintaining cognitive function, metabolic health, and circadian stability, all of which are challenged by shift work. Irregular schedules and busy clinical environments frequently lead emergency physicians to skip meals or rely on highly processed foods, which can produce fluctuations in blood glucose that contribute to fatigue, irritability, and impaired concentration.

                                                                                        • Meals that combine complex carbohydrates, protein, and healthy fats help maintain more stable energy levels and sustained cognitive performance compared with refined carbohydrate–heavy foods. In practice, bringing prepared meals or nutrient-dense snacks to shift can help avoid reliance on convenience foods during busy periods.
                                                                                        • Meal timing also influences circadian rhythms. Maintaining relatively consistent eating patterns can support metabolic regulation, while large meals during night shifts may worsen fatigue and gastrointestinal discomfort; many clinicians tolerate smaller, lighter meals overnight more effectively.
                                                                                        • Hydration and caffeine use also affect performance. Even mild dehydration can impair attention and reaction time, while moderate caffeine early in a shift may improve alertness. Excessive or late caffeine intake, however, can interfere with post-shift sleep and contribute to cumulative fatigue.
                                                                                        • Simple strategies such as planning meals, prioritizing balanced nutrition, maintaining hydration, and using caffeine strategically can meaningfully support cognitive performance and long-term health throughout a career in emergency medicine.
                                                                                        • Bottom Line – > Ultimately, maintaining personal physiologic health should be viewed not as optional self-care but as a professional responsibility essential for sustaining high-quality emergency care over the course of a long career.

                                                                                          The post PODCAST: EM Quick Hits 71 EMC²: Fever Without a Source, Coaching the EM Mind Part 1, Traumatic Pneumothorax Part 2, PECARN C-spine Rule, Medetomidine Withdrawal, EMS Handover first appeared on האיגוד הישראלי לרפואה דחופה.

                                                                                          1 hr 39 min
                                                                                        • PODCAST: EM Quick Hits 70 MedMal Cases Upper Back Pain, Traumatic Pneumothorax/Hemothorax Decision Making, Risk Stratification of ICH for Consultation, Post-Circumcision Bleeds, IV Contrast Allergy, Emotional Contagion
                                                                                          “This learning material is sourced from Emergency Medicine Cases  and has been published here with permission as per Creative Commons copyright.” 
                                                                                          Topics in this EM Quick Hits podcast

                                                                                          Mike Weinstock on medmal cases: upper back pain (1:29)

                                                                                          Andrew Petrosoniak on traumatic pneumothorax and hemothorax decision making (27:55)

                                                                                          Justin Morgenstern on brain injury guidelines: risk stratification for neurosurgical consult, imaging and admission (38:23)

                                                                                          Andrew Tagg on management of post-circumcision bleeding  (47:32)

                                                                                          Hans Rosenberg & Ariel Hendin on evaluation and management of CT contrast allergy  (50:30)

                                                                                          Shawn Seregren on emotional contagion in resuscitation teams  (59:30)

                                                                                          Podcast production, editing and sound design by Anton Helman

                                                                                          Podcast content, written summary & blog post by Anton Helman, January, 2026

                                                                                          Cite this podcast as: Helman, Petrosoniak, A. Morgenstern, J. Tagg, A. Rosenberg, H. Hendin, A. Seregren, S. EM Quick Hits 70 – MedMal Case Upper Back Pain, Traumatic Pneumothorax/Hemothorax Decision Making, Risk Stratification of ICH for Consultation, Post-Circumcision Bleeds, IV Contrast Allergy, Emotional Contagion. Emergency Medicine Cases. January, 2026. https://emergencymedicinecases.com/em-quick-hits-70-jan-2026/. Accessed January 14, 2026.

                                                                                          Traumatic Pneumothorax and Hemothorax Decision Making: A 3-Step Approach

                                                                                          This is Part 1 of a 2-part EM Quick Hits series on traumatic pneumothorax/hemothorax

                                                                                          Step 1: Stratify patients with traumatic pneumothorax by physiology
                                                                                          • Peri-arrest
                                                                                          • Unstable / precariously stable
                                                                                          • Stable
                                                                                          • This determines urgency, imaging, and tube selection for traumatic pneumothorax.

                                                                                            Peri-arrest or unstable patients with suspected traumatic pneumothorax: Immediate decompression is required—often before imaging. Finger thoracostomy followed by large-bore surgical chest tube placement prioritizes speed, reliability, and maximal drainage.

                                                                                            • Classic signs like tracheal deviation are late and unreliable
                                                                                            • Hypoxia or hypotension in the presence of chest trauma is enough to act.
                                                                                            • For unstable or precariously stable patients, ultrasound beats auscultation; absent lung sliding plus hypoxia or hypotension is enough to act on with chest tube, even if supine CXR looks “normal” (deep sulcus sign is helpful but late and often subtle).
                                                                                            • Stable patients allow for nuance. Imaging-based thresholds for traumatic pneumothorax help guide decisions:

                                                                                              • Chest X-ray: pneumothorax >38 mm or >20% hemithorax

                                                                                              • CT chest: pneumothorax >35 mm (largest lung-to-chest-wall distance)

                                                                                                For hemothorax, CT is preferred as size is difficult to quantify on ultrasound and chest X-ray; roughly 300 mL or pleural thickness >1.5 cm is a practical cutoff for drainage.

                                                                                                Stable patients generally benefit from CT imaging, which improves diagnostic certainty and decision-making.

                                                                                                Step 2: Imaging-Based Indications for chest tube in traumatic pneumothorax — Numeric Cutoffs
                                                                                                Imaging Modality
                                                                                                Measurement Cutoff
                                                                                                Chest Tube Indicated?
                                                                                                Notes & Limitations
                                                                                                Chest X-ray
                                                                                                > 38 mm lung-to-chest wall distance
                                                                                                Yes
                                                                                                Applies mainly to upright films; supine films underestimate
                                                                                                Chest X-ray
                                                                                                > 20% of hemithorax
                                                                                                Yes
                                                                                                Estimation is imprecise; use cautiously
                                                                                                CT chest
                                                                                                > 35 mm maximal lung-to-chest wall distance (axial view)
                                                                                                Yes
                                                                                                Best applied in stable patients without hemothorax
                                                                                                Serial imaging
                                                                                                Increasing pneumothorax size
                                                                                                Yes
                                                                                                Especially if symptoms evolve
                                                                                                Any imaging
                                                                                                Pneumothorax + hemothorax
                                                                                                Yes
                                                                                                Blood + air → tube thoracostomy

                                                                                                *These thresholds apply primarily to patients without hemothorax and without significant oxygen requirements.

                                                                                                *Decisions should integrate imaging findings with respiratory status and work of breathing.

                                                                                                Step 3: Tube choice for traumatic pneumothorax and hemothorax

                                                                                                Evidence supports pigtail catheters for stable patients with traumatic pneumothorax and hemothorax, with similar outcomes to large-bore tubes. However, large-bore surgical tubes remain preferred in unstable patients, those with suspected pleural adhesions, significant subcutaneous emphysema, or complex injury patterns.

                                                                                                Expand to view reference list
                                                                                                Risk Stratification of Traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage for Consultation, Admission & Repeat Imaging

                                                                                                The AAST Brain Injury Guidelines (BIG 1–3) stratify traumatic intracranial hemorrhage by clinical risk and bleed characteristics to reduce unnecessary neurosurgery consults, repeat CTs and admissions while maintaining patient safety. Risk assignment is based on neurologic exam, intoxication status, anticoagulation, and bleed characteristics.

                                                                                                • Any neuro abnormality → high risk.
                                                                                                • Intoxication bumps risk (often at least moderate).
                                                                                                • Anticoagulants/antiplatelets tend to push patients into higher-risk pathways in many versions—be cautious and localize to your system.
                                                                                                • Prospective data show zero neurosurgical interventions in BIG 1 (low risk) and BIG 2 (moderate risk) patients, but some low- and moderate-risk patients demonstrate radiographic progression without clinical deterioration.
                                                                                                • BIG 1 (low risk): small, simple bleeds, perfect neuro exam, no intoxication, no anticoagulants → in the study there were no neurosurgical interventions and very low rates of progression, but the data are still limited and confidence intervals wide.

                                                                                                  BIG 2 (moderate risk): normal exam but larger bleeds or higher‑risk features → admit, repeat exam and CT; neurosurgical consultation is not mandatory up front, as neurosurgery interventions were 0% in this group despite ~7% radiographic progression.

                                                                                                  BIG 3 (high risk): any neuro abnormality, anticoagulation/antiplatelet use (including aspirin), or larger/more complex bleeds → neurosurgery consult, admission and repeat CT; this group had high rates of clinical deterioration, progression and neurosurgical intervention.

                                                                                                  Pragmatic approach:

                                                                                                  • BIG 1 (low risk): consider observation + reassessment; discharge only if your local system supports it and follow-up is reliable.

                                                                                                  • BIG 2 (moderate risk): admission often reasonable; consider repeat imaging selectively (progression isn’t zero).

                                                                                                  • BIG 3 (high risk): neurosurgical consult + admission + repeat imaging.

                                                                                                    Practical indications to call neurosurgery + admit + repeat CT (BIG-informed)
                                                                                                    Decision
                                                                                                    Practical triggers
                                                                                                    Call neurosurgery now
                                                                                                    Any abnormal neuro exam, clinical deterioration, or CT/high-risk features consistent with BIG-3

                                                                                                    Admit for observation
                                                                                                    BIG-2 or BIG-3 (e.g., intoxication, concerning comorbidity, bleed pattern/size above “minor”)

                                                                                                    Repeat CT
                                                                                                    BIG-3 routinely; consider in selected BIG-2 (especially if you’re admitting anyway and progression risk is a concern)
                                                                                                    ED obs then discharge
                                                                                                    BIG-1 (strict low-risk criteria) after ~6h observation if neuro exam remains normal and no clinical worsening

                                                                                                    First10EM deeper dive into AAST Brain Injury Guidelines

                                                                                                    Expand to view reference list
                                                                                                    Management of Post-Circumcision Bleeding in Infants: Simple Measures & When to Escalate Care
                                                                                                    Assessment of post-circumcision bleeding
                                                                                                    • Early post‑circumcision bleeding is the most common complication (≈0.1–2%), usually occurs within 24-48hrs from a small frenular capillary rather than an arterial source, and is visually dramatic but often minor. Arterial bleeds, however, are rare and can be life-threatening. Early bleeding (<48 hours) is usually mechanical; late bleeding (5–10 days) suggests infection or clot disruption.
                                                                                                    • Late or excessive bleeding should prompt evaluation for bleeding disorders.
                                                                                                    • ​Focused history should clarify timing (continuous vs stopped and restarted), feeding, urine output and overall alertness to screen for clinically significant blood loss or evolving shock.​
                                                                                                    • Blood often pools in the diaper and looks worse than it is—gentle inspection is essential.
                                                                                                    • Clean the area with saline to visualize the source.
                                                                                                    • Management of post-circumcision bleeding
                                                                                                      • Direct pressure for 5–10 uninterrupted minutes is first-line and often definitive. ​
                                                                                                      • Persistent pinpoint ooze after proper pressure can be managed with simple local measures. Options include silver nitrate and/or topical epinephrine, Surgicel or TXA‑soaked gauze.​
                                                                                                      • Failure of local measures raises concern for frenular artery bleeding. Escalate urgently to surgery (peds urology or general surgery, depending on local setup) when bleeding does not stop despite appropriate local measures, or in any child who appears pale, lethargic, poorly feeding or oliguric.
                                                                                                      • Expand to view reference list
                                                                                                        IV Contrast Allergy: Retiring Steroids, Embracing Evidence

                                                                                                        Modern iodinated and gadolinium contrast agents are remarkably safe. Contrast agents used after 2000 are significantly safer than older formulations.

                                                                                                        True contrast hypersensitivity is rare, most “contrast allergies” are misclassified, and routine steroid premedication should be abandoned.

                                                                                                        How common are true allergic reactions?

                                                                                                        • Immediate hypersensitivity reactions (HRs) to modern iodinated contrast: ~0.2–0.7%
                                                                                                        • Severe reactions (anaphylaxis): ~0.02%
                                                                                                        • Delayed reactions (mostly rash): ~0.05%
                                                                                                        • Gadolinium reactions are even rarer; true anaphylaxis is extremely uncommon
                                                                                                        • Shellfish or iodine allergies are not contrast allergies.

                                                                                                          Many “contrast allergies” represent physiologic or non-allergic reactions.

                                                                                                          Longstanding steroid premedication protocols persist despite weak, outdated evidence derived from older high-osmolar contrast agents. Contemporary data show:

                                                                                                          • Steroids do not reliably prevent severe reactions
                                                                                                          • The number needed to treat to prevent one severe reaction is extremely high
                                                                                                          • Premedication causes delays, longer hospital stays, and real harms (infection, VTE, fractures)
                                                                                                          • Contrast switching

                                                                                                            • The single most effective strategy to reduce repeat reactions is contrast switching to a chemically different agent, reducing recurrence risk by ~60%.
                                                                                                            • More effective than steroids or antihistamines
                                                                                                            • Works for both iodinated contrast and gadolinium
                                                                                                            • Which antihistamines are best for treatment of true mild IV contrast allergy?

                                                                                                              • Second-generation antihistamines (e.g., cetirizine, loratadine)
                                                                                                                • Helpful for mild prior reactions
                                                                                                                • Low risk, rapid onset
                                                                                                                • First-generation antihistamines (diphenhydramine) are not recommended due to sedation and side effects
                                                                                                                • Poor documentation is the biggest barrier to safe imaging—always record the exact contrast agent, reaction type (immediate vs delayed), severity, treatment required, and outcome.

                                                                                                                  Bottom line: switch contrast agents, document accurately, and stop reflex steroid premedication.

                                                                                                                  Expand to view reference list
                                                                                                                  Emotional Contagion in Team Resuscitation

                                                                                                                  Resuscitations are not emotionally neutral environments. Emotional contagion describes how tone, pace, and affect spread unconsciously through teams, shaping the emotional climate of the room. The emotional tone of a resuscitation is strongly influenced by the team leader. Leaders often underestimate how their tone affects team performance. A rushed or sharp tone amplifies anxiety, cognitive overload, and error. Calm, firm leadership steadies performance—even when decisions are complex or stakes are high. Simple, trainable behaviors help regulate the room:

                                                                                                                  • Pause before speaking
                                                                                                                  • Take a single breath before giving the next order
                                                                                                                  • Lowering your voice — not raising it — improves clarity and control.
                                                                                                                  • Structured summaries reset both cognition and emotional tone.
                                                                                                                  • Anchor yourself by making eye contact with the calmest person present
                                                                                                                  • Importantly, leadership is shared. Nurses, recorders, and respiratory therapists can actively dampen rising tension with neutral phrasing and steady updates. Leadership skills require deliberate practice, often recognized after simulation.

                                                                                                                    Bottom line: emotional regulation is not “soft skills”—it is a patient safety intervention.

                                                                                                                    Expand to view reference list

                                                                                                                    The post PODCAST: EM Quick Hits 70 MedMal Cases Upper Back Pain, Traumatic Pneumothorax/Hemothorax Decision Making, Risk Stratification of ICH for Consultation, Post-Circumcision Bleeds, IV Contrast Allergy, Emotional Contagion first appeared on האיגוד הישראלי לרפואה דחופה.

                                                                                                                    1 hr 7 min
                                                                                                                  • PODCAST: EM Quick Hits Pediatric Urinary Retention & Acute Transverse Myelitis, Post-Dural Puncture Headache, Med Mal Cases: Clenched Fist Injury, IV Thrombolysis for Minor Stroke, EM Leadership Spotlight #4
                                                                                                                    “This learning material is sourced from Emergency Medicine Cases  and has been published here with permission as per Creative Commons copyright.” 
                                                                                                                    Topics in this EM Quick Hits podcast

                                                                                                                    Deborah Schonfeld on pediatric urinary retention & acute transverse myelitis (01:27)

                                                                                                                    Jesse McLaren on Occlusion MI Diagnosis (24:44)

                                                                                                                    Matthew McArthur on post-dural puncture headache (31:34)

                                                                                                                    Joseph Yasmeh on Med Mal Cases: clenched fist injury (42:42)

                                                                                                                    Brit Long on IV thrombolysis for minor strokes (59:27)

                                                                                                                    Victoria Myers & Lauren Westafer on mentorship and what it means to be a physician leader (1:11:34)

                                                                                                                    Podcast production, editing and sound design by Anton Helman

                                                                                                                    Podcast content, written summary & blog post by Brandon Ng, edited by Anton Helman, December, 2025

                                                                                                                    Cite this podcast as: Helman, A. Schonfeld, D. McLaren, J. McArther, M. Yasmeh, J. Long, B. Myers, V. Westafer, L. EM Quick Hits 69 – Pediatric Urinary Retention & Acute Transverse Myelitis, Post-Dural Puncture Headache, Med Mal Cases: Clenched Fist Injury, IV Thrombolysis for Minor Stroke, EM Leadership Spotlight #4. Emergency Medicine Cases. December, 2025. https://emergencymedicinecases.com/em-quick-hits-month-year/. Accessed December 3, 2025.

                                                                                                                    Pediatric Urinary Retention & Acute Transverse Myelitis
                                                                                                                    Definition of urinary retention in pediatrics

                                                                                                                    Inability to void at least 12 hours, no urine output for 12 hours, greater volume of urine in the bladder expected for age, or palpable bladder distension.

                                                                                                                    Max bladder capacity in mL = age + 2 x 30 (for <12 years of age)
                                                                                                                    Pediatric urinary retention history taking tips
                                                                                                                    • Can be reported as feeling that the child is “holding urine”, unable to fully empty bladder, or frequent bathroom trips with weak stream.
                                                                                                                    • May have significant abdo pain, abdo/bladder distension, restlessness/irritability.
                                                                                                                    • Try to differentiate from oliguria vs. retention.
                                                                                                                    • Differential diagnosis of pediatric urinary retention
                                                                                                                      • Infectious/inflammatory: UTI/cystitis, balanitis/balanoposthitis, vulvovaginitis.
                                                                                                                      • Obstructive: Phimosis, meatal stenosis, labial adhesions, urethral strictures, posterior urethral valves, external (intrabdominal or pelvic) compression, hematometrocolpos (vaginal/uterine accumulation of blood due to obstruction), constipation.
                                                                                                                      • Postoperative/anesthesia
                                                                                                                      • Dysfunctional urine voiding: behavioral, lack of coordination between bladder and urethral sphincter muscle.
                                                                                                                      • Neurogenic: interruption at any level from brain to spinal cord to peripheral nerves.
                                                                                                                        • Spinal cord:
                                                                                                                          • Compressive: spinal tumors (e.g. ependymomas, astrocytoma), epidural abscesses, herniated discs, hematoma.
                                                                                                                          • Inflammatory: acute transverse myelitis, GBS.
                                                                                                                          • Malformation: spinal bifida, tethered cord.
                                                                                                                          • Medications: anticholinergics/antihistamines, sympathomimetics (often in decongestants).
                                                                                                                          • Clinical pearls for pediatric urinary retention
                                                                                                                            • Counsel parents to let patient urinate within warm water; decreases direct contact of acidic urine with inflamed or irritated tissue and can reduce withholding behavior.
                                                                                                                            • Unexplained urinary retention is always concerning: consider neurologic pathologies if other tests are negative.
                                                                                                                            • Pediatric acute transverse myelitis
                                                                                                                              • Rare, inflammatory, demyelinating disorder of the spinal cord.
                                                                                                                              • Highest incidence between 10-40 years of age, with 20% occurring in the pediatric population.
                                                                                                                              • Etiology: idiopathic (post-infectious/autoimmune process), secondary (associated with active infections, systemic inflammatory conditions, connective tissue disorders), or part of demyelinating or CNS condition (e.g. MS, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis).
                                                                                                                              • Clinical features of transverse myelitis
                                                                                                                                • Typically presents over hours to days.
                                                                                                                                • Affects transverse section of one or more levels of the spinal cord with motor/sensory/autonomic dysfunction below the level of the lesion in a myelopathic distribution.
                                                                                                                                  • Motor: Rapidly progressive paraparesis/paraplegia.
                                                                                                                                  • Sensation: reduced or absence sensation below the affected level, back pain, dysesthesia.
                                                                                                                                  • Autonomic: bowel or bladder incontinence or retention.
                                                                                                                                  • Often missed on initial visit, with patients returning to ED with progressive symptoms.
                                                                                                                                  • Bottom line: Urinary retention may present variably in pediatric patients. In pediatric patients with otherwise unexplained urinary retention, consider neurogenic causes of urinary retention in patients.

                                                                                                                                    Expand to view reference list

                                                                                                                                    Triptych Approach to Occlusion MI Diagnosis
                                                                                                                                    Classic STEMI Criteria for OMI
                                                                                                                                    • LR+ = 12.5: STEMI criteria present = OMI becomes much more likely even if patient does not have classic symptoms.
                                                                                                                                    • LR− = 0.59: STEMI criteria absent only slightly lowers probability = cannot rule out OMI in higher-risk presentations.
                                                                                                                                    • The “Triptych” Approach to Improve Accuracy of OMI Diagnosis
                                                                                                                                      1. Determining pre-test likelihood for OMI based on history and assessment
                                                                                                                                          • A = anginal equivalents (not just chest pain)
                                                                                                                                          • C = continuous vs resolved symptoms
                                                                                                                                          • S = stability (hemodynamic)
                                                                                                                                            1. ECG
                                                                                                                                                • Advanced OMI signs perform better (LR+ = 14, LR− = 0.23): e.g. Modified Sgarbossa criteria increases likelihood of OMI in LBBB, or lack of reciprocal AVL change decreases OMI likelihood when there is borderline inferior ST elevation
                                                                                                                                                  1. POCUS
                                                                                                                                                      • Patients can have OMI without any ECG changes
                                                                                                                                                      • Use POCUS to look for regional wall motion abnormality: especially with high pre-test likelihood but subtle/non-diagnostic ECG
                                                                                                                                                      • Bottom line: ECG represents only one aspect of the clinical picture. Do not interpret ECGs using STEMI criteria alone. Consider POCUS to enhance diagnosis of OMI.

                                                                                                                                                        Expand to view reference list

                                                                                                                                                        Deeper Dive and practice ECGs: ECG Cases 57 Art of Occlusion MI Part 5 – Clinical-ECG-POCUS Triptych

                                                                                                                                                        Register for Dr. McLaren’s HEARTS ECG Course to master your ECG interpretation skills.

                                                                                                                                                        Post Dural Puncture Headache (Post LP Headache) Recognition, Prevention and Management

                                                                                                                                                        Consider post-dural puncture headache in any patient with new positional headache that occurs within five days of a dural puncture.

                                                                                                                                                        Clinical features of post dural puncture headache
                                                                                                                                                        • Symptom severity ranges from mild to debilitating
                                                                                                                                                        • Positional headache after recent lumbar puncture within 5 days
                                                                                                                                                        • Relieved by lying down, intolerable pounding headache when upright
                                                                                                                                                        • Associated neck & shoulder stiffness/pain, tinnitus, visual disturbances (diplopia), and dizziness/vertigo
                                                                                                                                                        • Risk factors for post dural puncture headache
                                                                                                                                                          • Patient: younger age and female sex.
                                                                                                                                                          • Procedural: Size and type of spinal needle (larger needles and sharper bevel increases risk).
                                                                                                                                                          • Prevention of post dural puncture headache
                                                                                                                                                            • Routine use of non-cutting spinal needles for lumbar puncture for all population (Grade A evidence, high level of certainty) (Uppal et al. 2023).
                                                                                                                                                            • If using cutting needle, use narrowest gauge possible and position needle with bevel aligned in longitudinal axis of the spine.
                                                                                                                                                            • Investigations for suspected post dural puncture headache
                                                                                                                                                              • Neuroimaging: not routine, consider if focal neurological deficits, vision changes, altered GCS or seizures, or suspecting an alternative diagnosis.
                                                                                                                                                              • Treatment of post dural puncture headache
                                                                                                                                                                • Symptoms typically self-resolves within 1 week (time taken for punctured dura to heal).
                                                                                                                                                                • Non-pharmacologic:
                                                                                                                                                                  • Support supine position for comfort.
                                                                                                                                                                  • Maintain adequate hydration (preferably oral).
                                                                                                                                                                  • Pharmacologic:
                                                                                                                                                                    • NSAID or acetaminophen, or short course of opioids.
                                                                                                                                                                    • There is some evidence to suggest that caffeine up to 900 mg per day if presenting <24h of symptom onset may improve symptoms
                                                                                                                                                                    • Procedural:
                                                                                                                                                                      • Epidural blood patch (definitive treatment): 20mL of patient’s own blood injected into epidural space at the level of the dural puncture. Performed by anesthesia.
                                                                                                                                                                      • Temporary local nerve block, including occipital nerve block (Uppal et al. 2023).
                                                                                                                                                                      • Temporary transnasal sphenopalatine block: topical lidocaine/bupivacaine applied into both nostrils until contact made with posterior pharynx x10-15min (Uppal et al. 2023).
                                                                                                                                                                      • Expand to view reference list

                                                                                                                                                                        MedMal Cases: Clenched Fist Injury – Fight Bite

                                                                                                                                                                        This case involves an young adult male who presents with an injured hand that occurred when “messing around with some friends” when a brick “fell directly onto the back of his left hand”. The case highlights the importance of spotting the disconnect between the patient’s story and the presenting wound.

                                                                                                                                                                        Clenched Fist Injury (Fight Bite) = consider in any laceration over the dorsal aspect of MCP or PIP joints, usually in the dominant hand.

                                                                                                                                                                        Pathophysiology of clenched fist injury (fight bite)

                                                                                                                                                                        • Fist-to-tooth contact – inoculation of human oral flora often into the joint space.
                                                                                                                                                                        • When hand relaxes – skin and tendon wound retract, sealing bacteria inside the joint fluid.
                                                                                                                                                                        • Synovial fluid acts as a nutrient-rich medium – rapid, severe joint infection despite benign skin findings.
                                                                                                                                                                        • Red-flag exam: Pain with passive finger motion = deep infection (infectious tenosynovitis/septic arthritis) until proven otherwise.

                                                                                                                                                                          Investigations for suspected clenched fist injury (fight bite)

                                                                                                                                                                          • X-ray to rule out fracture or foreign body. Does not rule out tendon/ligament/joint capsule injury or infection.
                                                                                                                                                                          • Critical Error #1: During wound care (including anesthetizing, irrigation and exploration), the tendon sheath was “frayed”, but the wound was closed with sutures.

                                                                                                                                                                            • Frayed tendon sheath – direct signs inoculation injury likely into the joint space.
                                                                                                                                                                            • Fight bite should be left open to drain.
                                                                                                                                                                            • Critical Error #2: Cefazolin/cephalexin were given for the skin and soft tissue injury.

                                                                                                                                                                              • Inadequate coverage for human bite organisms (fastidious gram-negative rods, Eikenella corrodens (often multi-drug resistant), Strep viridans, anerobes.
                                                                                                                                                                              • Tetanus booster (if not up to date) required given likely contaminated environment
                                                                                                                                                                              • Typical antibiotic first line: Amoxicillin-clavulanate
                                                                                                                                                                              • Critical Error #3: Patient was discharged with a splint and told to follow-up with a plastic surgeon in several days.

                                                                                                                                                                                • Recommended follow up is re-evaluation within 24 hours (in the ED or by plastics).
                                                                                                                                                                                • Additional considerations: An accurate diagnosis and reasonable plan may fail if the patient can’t access treatment.

                                                                                                                                                                                  • Give first antibiotic dose in ED.
                                                                                                                                                                                  • Choose affordable/generic options.
                                                                                                                                                                                  • Consider involving social work/case management to ensure the patient can obtain and start meds promptly.
                                                                                                                                                                                  • Bottom line: Trust the injury pattern not the story, injury over the knuckles of young person = clenched fist injury until proven otherwise. For bite wounds: irrigate thoroughly, do not suture primarily, splint hand in position of function, follow-up within 24-48 hours, and preferred antibiotic is amoxicillin-clavulanate. Acknowledge and address barriers of care to help ensure that patient gets the treatment you prescribe.

                                                                                                                                                                                    *This case was obtained from Dr. Mike Weinstock’s EM Boucebacks series of closed legal cases

                                                                                                                                                                                    IV Thrombolysis for Disabling Minor Stroke

                                                                                                                                                                                    To address an EM Caser’s concern about the questionable evidence for IV thrombolysis in patients who present within 4.5 hours of symptom onset with a minor stroke (defined as NIHSS ≤5) but their stroke is deemed disabling, we asked Brit Long for an evidence-based deep dive…

                                                                                                                                                                                    Current Guidelines

                                                                                                                                                                                    • AHA and ASA: IVT within 4.5h for patients with ischemic stroke.
                                                                                                                                                                                    • Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations (2022): eligible patients with disabling ischemic stroke, who can receive IVT (alteplase/tenecteplase) within 4.5h of stroke symptom onset time/last known well time should be offered IVT (Strong recommendation; High quality of evidence).
                                                                                                                                                                                    • ACEP clinical policy (2024):
                                                                                                                                                                                      • Stroke patients who are candidates for both mechanical thrombectomy and IVT, IVT should be offered and may be given prior to mechanical thrombectomy, and that if IVT will be administered, it should be given within 4.5h from symptom onset (Level B recommendation).
                                                                                                                                                                                      • When feasible, shared decision making between the patient/surrogate and the health care team should include a discussion of potential benefits and harms prior to the decision whether to administer IVT (Level C recommendation; Consensus recommendation).
                                                                                                                                                                                      • Literature on IVT in disabling strokes:

                                                                                                                                                                                        • Several meta-analyses have attempted to pool data on RCT data, but study limitations (including heterogeneity among trials, selective emphasis on trials claiming IVT benefit, individual trial bias, financial conflicts of interest, trials stopping early, low power) limit conclusions that can be drawn.
                                                                                                                                                                                        • Evidence supporting IVT
                                                                                                                                                                                          Evidence against IVT
                                                                                                                                                                                          2 trials between 1995 to 2012 have demonstrated benefit: 

                                                                                                                                                                                          ·       NINDS II (1995): n = 333, 12% benefit with IVT in 3 hours.

                                                                                                                                                                                          ·       ECASS III (2008): n = 821, 8% benefit with IVT in 3-4.5 hours.

                                                                                                                                                                                           

                                                                                                                                                                                          Re-analyses of NINDS II and ECASS III suggest that baseline imbalance in stroke severity likely responsible for the difference in outcome supporting IVT. Accounting for differences, there is likely no benefit with IVT and potential risk of harm (Hoffman and Schriger 2009, Alper et al. 2020).
                                                                                                                                                                                          Fragility index was 3 for NINDS II and 1 for ECASS III.
                                                                                                                                                                                          Most RCTs have not found a benefit with IVT.
                                                                                                                                                                                          5 RCTs suggest increased mortality with IVT in stroke (12-16% higher risk).

                                                                                                                                                                                          Literature on IVT in non-disabling stroke:

                                                                                                                                                                                          • Several available studies comparing IVT to antiplatelet therapy (aspirin +/- clopidogrel/ticagrelor): PRISMS trial (2018), ARAMIS trial (2023), TEMPO-2 trial (2024) and PUMICE trial (2024).
                                                                                                                                                                                          • A 2025 meta-analysis found no improvement in excellent recovery with thrombolysis, but there were lower odds of 90-day independence with thrombolysis (OR 0.7, ARD 2.5%, NNH 40) and an increased mortality with thrombolysis (OR 2.4, ARD 1.5%, NNH 66)
                                                                                                                                                                                            • Limitations: heterogeneity with differing definitions of disabling symptoms, agents, time windows for treatment, routine care strategies, concomitant interventions, follow-up times.
                                                                                                                                                                                            • Trials did not enroll patients with strokes presenting with isolated dysarthria, ataxia, facial weakness, sensory symptoms, and other isolated symptoms not captured by the NIH stroke score.
                                                                                                                                                                                            • Overall, evidence suggest that risk of IVT outweigh benefits in patients with non-disabling strokes.
                                                                                                                                                                                            • Optimizing practice:

                                                                                                                                                                                              • Define disability in strokes based on the individual patient rather than on the NIHSS.
                                                                                                                                                                                              • For nondisabling strokes, current data strongly support antiplatelets and risk factor modification, not thrombolysis.
                                                                                                                                                                                              • In disabling stroke, legal implications of not giving thrombolytics may outweigh risk of complications from IVT.
                                                                                                                                                                                              • Follow your local institutional protocols on IVT in stroke, and ensure neurology is on board.
                                                                                                                                                                                              • Present purported risks and benefits of IVT to patients/family, used shared decision making, and document the discussion.
                                                                                                                                                                                              • Bottom line: Evidence overall suggests that risk of IVT may outweigh benefits in patients with minor stroke, however for disabling minor strokes, IVT should be offered. Consider legal implications of not giving IVT in disabling minor strokes. Reference your local institutional protocols on IVT for stroke.

                                                                                                                                                                                                For further listening on referenced EMCases episodes and Dr. Katie Lin’s take on the evidence for thrombolysis is disabling minor stroke in the comments sections: Ep 208 Paradigm Shift in Ischemic Stroke Management Part 1: Disabling Strokes and Ep 209 Nondisabling Stroke Recognition and Management.

                                                                                                                                                                                                Expand to view reference list

                                                                                                                                                                                                1. Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, Biller J, Brown M, Demaerschalk BM, Hoh B, Jauch EC, Kidwell CS, Leslie-Mazwi TM, Ovbiagele B, Scott PA, Sheth KN, Southerland AM, Summers DV, Tirschwell DL. Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2019 Dec;50(12):e344-e418.  Epub 2019 Oct 30. Erratum in: Stroke. 2019 Dec;50(12):e440-e441.
                                                                                                                                                                                                2. American College of Emergency Physicians Clinical Policies Subcommittee (Writing Committee) on Thrombolytics; Lo BM, Carpenter CR, Milne K, Panagos P, Haukoos JS, Diercks DB; Members of the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) Clinical Policies Committee (Oversight Committee); Diercks DB, Anderson JD, Byyny R, Carpenter CR, Friedman BW, Gemme SR, Gerardo CJ, Godwin SA, Hatten BW, Haukoos JS, Kaji A, Kwok H, Lo BM, Mace SE, Mattu A, Promes SB, Shah KH, Shih RD, Silvers SM, Slivinski A, Smith MD, Thiessen MEW, Thompson JT, Tomaszewski CA, Trent SA, Valente JH, Westafer LM, Wall SP, Yu Y, Lin MP, Finnell JT, Schulz T, Vandertulip K. Clinical Policy: Use of Thrombolytics for the Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Emergency Department. Ann Emerg Med. 2024 Dec;84(6):e57-e86.
                                                                                                                                                                                                3. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 1995 Dec 14;333(24):1581-7.
                                                                                                                                                                                                4. Hacke W, Kaste M, Bluhmki E, Brozman M, Dávalos A, Guidetti D, Larrue V, Lees KR, Medeghri Z, Machnig T, Schneider D, von Kummer R, Wahlgren N, Toni D; ECASS Investigators. Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2008 Sep 25;359(13):1317-29.
                                                                                                                                                                                                5. Hoffman JR, Schriger DL. A graphic reanalysis of the NINDS Trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Sep;54(3):329-36, 336.e1-35. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.03.019. Epub 2009 May 23. PMID: 19464756.
                                                                                                                                                                                                6. Alper BS, Foster G, Thabane L, Rae-Grant A, Malone-Moses M, Manheimer E. Thrombolysis with alteplase 3-4.5 hours after acute ischaemic stroke: trial reanalysis adjusted for baseline imbalances. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2020 Oct;25(5):168-171.
                                                                                                                                                                                                7. Doheim MF, Nguyen TN, Xiong Y, Chen HS, Bhatt NR, Wang Y, Nogueira RG. Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on IV Thrombolysis in Patients With Minor Acute Ischemic Stroke. 2025 Aug 12;105(3):e213863.
                                                                                                                                                                                                8. Long B, Gottlieb M. Intravenous Thrombolysis for Minor Acute Ischemic Stroke. Acad Emerg Med. 2025 Sep 4.
                                                                                                                                                                                                9. https://first10em.com/thrombolytics-for-acute-ischemic-stroke-nnt-evidence-review/
                                                                                                                                                                                                10. https://rebelem.com/thrombolysis-in-acute-ischemic-stroke-now-we-have-no-positive-rcts/
                                                                                                                                                                                                11. https://thesgem.com/2020/07/sgem297-tpa-advocates-be-like-never-gonn
                                                                                                                                                                                                12. The post PODCAST: EM Quick Hits Pediatric Urinary Retention & Acute Transverse Myelitis, Post-Dural Puncture Headache, Med Mal Cases: Clenched Fist Injury, IV Thrombolysis for Minor Stroke, EM Leadership Spotlight #4 first appeared on האיגוד הישראלי לרפואה דחופה.

                                                                                                                                                                                                  1 hr 33 min
                                                                                                                                                                                                13. PODCAST: Your Mission, Should You Choose to Accept It – To Be an EM Doc

                                                                                                                                                                                                  Date: June 2, 2025

                                                                                                                                                                                                  Dr. Andrew Tagg

                                                                                                                                                                                                  Guest Skeptic: Dr. Andrew (Andy) Tagg is an Emergency Physician with a special interest in education and lifelong learning. He is the co-founder and website lead of Don’t Forget the Bubbles.

                                                                                                                                                                                                  This is another SGEM Xtra that talks about what we can learn about being physicians from certain pop culture (TV and Movies). Past episodes include:

                                                                                                                                                                                                  • Star Trek Made Me A Better Physician
                                                                                                                                                                                                  • Lead Me On – What I Learned from Top Gun
                                                                                                                                                                                                  • Holding Out for a Hero – Lessons from The Dark Knight
                                                                                                                                                                                                  • Yeah, Might Be All that You Get – How Ted Lasso Made Us Better
                                                                                                                                                                                                  • Doctor, Doctor – Paging Dr. Robby (The Pitt)
                                                                                                                                                                                                  • Five EM Lessons from Mission Impossible Movies
                                                                                                                                                                                                    1. Precision Under Pressure: Ethan Hunt doesn’t get extra time or perfect conditions — and neither do we. Whether defusing a bomb or managing a crashing patient, calm execution under pressure saves lives.
                                                                                                                                                                                                    2. The Team is Everything: Hunt may be the face, but he’s nothing without Luther, Benji, and the crew. Medicine is no different: the best outcomes happen when we trust our team and play to each other’s strengths.
                                                                                                                                                                                                    3. Always Question the Intel: Just because it’s in the mission briefing doesn’t mean it’s true. Skeptical medicine is about challenging the “received wisdom” and verifying it before acting — just like a good IMF agent would
                                                                                                                                                                                                    4. Know Your Exit Strategy: Whether escaping a vault or de-escalating a high-stakes family discussion, always have a way out. Good clinicians plan for failure just as much as success — that’s what keeps patients (and careers) safe.
                                                                                                                                                                                                    5. Mission Fatigue is Real: Even Ethan looks wrecked sometimes. Adrenaline is not a sustainable fuel. We need to rest, recover, and recalibrate — especially if we want to perform at a high level over decades.
                                                                                                                                                                                                    6. The SGEM will return with a structured critical appraisal of a recent publication. We will continue to strive to reduce the Knowledge Translation (KT) window from over ten years to less than one year, leveraging the power of social media.

                                                                                                                                                                                                      Remember to be skeptical of anything you learn, even if you heard it on the Skeptics’ Guide to Emergency Medicine.

                                                                                                                                                                                                      Share:

                                                                                                                                                                                                      PreviousSGEM Xtra: Ten Lessons They Don’t Teach in Medical School (But Should)
                                                                                                                                                                                                      About The Author
                                                                                                                                                                                                      admin

                                                                                                                                                                                                      Dr. Wm. Ken Milne Emergency Medicine Physician Researcher/EBM Skeptic

                                                                                                                                                                                                      The post PODCAST: Your Mission, Should You Choose to Accept It – To Be an EM Doc first appeared on האיגוד הישראלי לרפואה דחופה.

                                                                                                                                                                                                      25 min
                                                                                                                                                                                                    7. PODCAST: Strategies for Keeping Trauma at Bay with Rob Orman, MD

                                                                                                                                                                                                      In this episode, Sam Ashoo, MD interviews Rob Orman, MD about ways to manage the trauma inflicted by the ER.

                                                                                                                                                                                                      • Discussing Trauma in Emergency Medicine
                                                                                                                                                                                                        • Personal Experiences with Trauma
                                                                                                                                                                                                        • The Impact of Suppression
                                                                                                                                                                                                        • Defining Trauma and Its Effects
                                                                                                                                                                                                        • Integration vs. Disintegration
                                                                                                                                                                                                        • Debriefing and Coping Mechanisms
                                                                                                                                                                                                          • The Driveway Debrief
                                                                                                                                                                                                          • Nurse and Physician Dynamics
                                                                                                                                                                                                          • Reflective Solitude vs. Isolation
                                                                                                                                                                                                          • Creating Narratives During Trauma
                                                                                                                                                                                                          • Dropping Anchor Technique
                                                                                                                                                                                                          • Body-Oriented Resets
                                                                                                                                                                                                          • Post-Incident Rituals
                                                                                                                                                                                                          • Addressing Lowercase t Traumas
                                                                                                                                                                                                          • Therapy and Trauma Pathways
                                                                                                                                                                                                          • For more about Rob Orman and physician coaching: https://roborman.com/

                                                                                                                                                                                                            Sam Ashoo, MD

                                                                                                                                                                                                            Sam Ashoo, MD, FACEP,  is board certified in emergency medicine and clinical informatics. He serves as EB Medicine’s editor-in-chief of interactive clinical pathways and FOAMEd blog, and host of EB Medicine’s EMplify podcast. Follow him below for more…

                                                                                                                                                                                                            The post PODCAST: Strategies for Keeping Trauma at Bay with Rob Orman, MD first appeared on האיגוד הישראלי לרפואה דחופה.

                                                                                                                                                                                                            51 min
                                                                                                                                                                                                          • PODCAST : summary EM clerkship CNS, Cardiopulmonary, Renal Diagnosis:

                                                                                                                                                                                                            Phase One: CNS

                                                                                                                                                                                                            • Ataxia, Slurred Speech, Confusion, N/V, Seizures
                                                                                                                                                                                                            • Phase Two: Cardiopulmonary

                                                                                                                                                                                                              • CHF, Cardiogenic Shock/Hypotension, Pulmonary Edema, ARDS
                                                                                                                                                                                                              • Phase Three: Renal

                                                                                                                                                                                                                • Flank pain, Hematuria, Oliguria, Renal Failure
                                                                                                                                                                                                                • Diagnosis:

                                                                                                                                                                                                                  • HIGH INDEX OF SUSPICION
                                                                                                                                                                                                                  • Ethylene Glycol Serum Level
                                                                                                                                                                                                                  • Elevated Osmolar Gap
                                                                                                                                                                                                                  • Serial Anion Gap Measurements
                                                                                                                                                                                                                  • Treatment:

                                                                                                                                                                                                                    • Fomepizole or Ethanol to prevent breakdown to toxic glycolic acid/oxalic acid
                                                                                                                                                                                                                    • Hemodialysis
                                                                                                                                                                                                                    • Consider Bicarb drip, pyridoxine, and thiamine
                                                                                                                                                                                                                    • The post PODCAST : summary EM clerkship CNS, Cardiopulmonary, Renal Diagnosis: first appeared on האיגוד הישראלי לרפואה דחופה.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                      19 min
                                                                                                                                                                                                                    • PODCAST: EM Quick Hits 63 S-TEC and HUS, IM Epinephrine in OHCA, Dengue, Geriatric Trauma Imaging, TTP
                                                                                                                                                                                                                      “This learning material is sourced from Emergency Medicine Cases  and has been published here with permission as per creative commons copyright”  
                                                                                                                                                                                                                      Topics in this EM Quick Hits podcast

                                                                                                                                                                                                                      Stephen Freedman on pediatric bloody diarrhea, S-TEC and hemolytic uremic syndrome (1:06)

                                                                                                                                                                                                                      Justin Morgenstern on the evidence for IM epinephrine in out of hospital cardiac arrest (27:04)

                                                                                                                                                                                                                      Matthew McArther on recognition and ED management of dengue fever (33:56)

                                                                                                                                                                                                                      Andrew Petrosoniak on imaging decision making in trauma in older patients (47:20)

                                                                                                                                                                                                                      Brit Long & Michael Gotlieb on recognition and management of TTP (59:10)

                                                                                                                                                                                                                      Podcast production, editing and sound design by Anton Helman

                                                                                                                                                                                                                      Podcast content, written summary & blog post by Brandon Ng, edited by Anton Helman, March, 2025

                                                                                                                                                                                                                      Cite this podcast as: Helman, A. Freedman, S. Morgenstern, J. McArther, M. Petrosoniak, A. Long, B. Gotlieb, M. EM Quick Hits 63 – S-TEC and HUS, IM Epinephrine in OHCA, Dengue, Geriatric Trauma Imaging, TTP. Emergency Medicine Cases. March, 2025. https://emergencymedicinecases.com/em-quick-hits-march-2025/. Accessed March 12, 2025.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                      Pediatric bloody diarrhea: Shiga Toxin Producing E. Coli (S-TEC) and HUS

                                                                                                                                                                                                                      Consider obtaining a stool specimen or rectal swab in the ED for PCR testing (not culture) to detect S-TEC, Salmonella, Shigella, and Campylobacter.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                      Which children with bloody diarrhea require bloodwork? Most children with blood in stool do not require blood work. Indications for bloodwork include:

                                                                                                                                                                                                                      • Hemodynamic instability
                                                                                                                                                                                                                      • S-TEC is high on your differential (bloodwork may be useful as baseline)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                      • Recent travel with bloody diarrhea and fever
                                                                                                                                                                                                                      • Close contact with S-TEC cases (~10% household transmission rate)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                      • When to suspect S-TEC?

                                                                                                                                                                                                                        • Severe crampy abdominal pain
                                                                                                                                                                                                                        • >15-20 small frequent, mucousy, bloody stools per day
                                                                                                                                                                                                                        • Low grade fever
                                                                                                                                                                                                                        • Signs of microangiopathy (e.g. petechiae, jaundice)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                        • Endemic area
                                                                                                                                                                                                                          • Children generally do not require stool O&P for acute diarrhea but should be considered for chronic abdominal pain, chronic diarrhea, or failure to thrive.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                            When to test for C.difficile? There is a high carriage rate of C. diff (up to ~50% in children under 2 years old). Consider C. diff testing only in children with risk factors such as recent antibiotic use or hospitalization, or as a second line test on follow up if bloody diarrhea persists that is not noted to be from another bacterial etiology.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                            Why is it important to recognize S-TEC?

                                                                                                                                                                                                                            A complication of S-TEC infection is Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (HUS), caused by Shiga toxin accumulation in the kidney which leads to the HUS triad: acute kidney injury, hemolysis, and thrombocytopenia.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                            • Shiga toxin 2 (STX2) is specifically associated with a 15-20% risk of HUS in children <5 years
                                                                                                                                                                                                                              • HUS development increases risk of dialysis to 50-60% within 1 week
                                                                                                                                                                                                                              • Differentiating between STX1 (<1% risk of HUS) and STX2 toxin can help risk-stratify patients
                                                                                                                                                                                                                              • How to risk stratify a positive STEC result:

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                • Assume blood in stool to be STX2 producing STEC until proven otherwise (non-bloody STEC unlikely making Shiga toxin 2 and unlikely to cause HUS)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                • Determine duration of diarrhea: HUS develops a median of 7 days after diarrhea onset
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  • Diarrhea >10 days = low risk of HUS
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  • Determining if toxin result is STX2+ (high risk)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  • How to manage high risk patients with confirmed S-TEC?

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    • Manage dehydration aggressively (volume depletion is associated with adverse outcomes in HUS)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    • Blood work q24h until reaching termination criteria (to allow early identification of microangiopathy)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      • Platelet drop is the earliest marker of evolving HUS
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      • Consider LDH to identify hemolysis
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      • Bottom line: Obtain early stool testing to identify children who present with bloody diarrhea for STEC, as some are at high risk of developing complications such as HUS. Children with STEC and their hydration status should be closely monitored.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Expand to view reference list

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Does IM epinephrine improve mortality in Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA)?

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        The Paper: Early intramuscular adrenaline administration is associated with improved survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest by Palatinus et al. Resuscitation 2024.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        This before-and-after study suggests 5mg IM epinephrine may improve survival when given while IV access is being secured during an out of hospital cardiac arrest.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        P: Adult patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest at a single-center urban setting

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        I (After): Single dose 5mg IM epinephrine prior IV/IO access in patient between November 2019 and May 2024

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        C (Before): Standard EMS ACLS protocol without IM epinephrine in patients between January 2010 and October 2019

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        O: Time to epi administration: 4.3 min in IM epi group, 7.8 min in standard protocol group. Survival to hospital admission: 37% in IM epi group, 32% in standard protocol group. Hospital survival: 11% in IM epi group, 7% in standard protocol group. Favourable neurological status at hospital discharge: 10% in IM epi group, 6% in standard protocol group

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Limitations of this study:

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        • Before-and-after design (not an RCT), so confounding factors may have influenced results.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        • Trial takes place over 14 years, and other aspects of care (e.g. temperature management, ECMO involvement, airway management techniques) may have changes over time which leads to improved outcomes in the after group.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          • An example of this is evidenced in the changes in baseline group data, where bystander CPR in the after group is ~14% higher and the age of patients are on average 3 years younger.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          • Results are somewhat contrary to other RCT studies, which suggests epinephrine improves overall survival but not neurologic outcomes.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          • Bottom line: There is insufficient evidence for early administration of IM epinephrine compared to standard ACLS protocols to improve outcomes in out of hospital cardiac arrest.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            Expand to view reference list

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            Recognition and management of dengue fever

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            Background: Dengue is a mosquito-borne flavivirus (related to Zika and West Nile) which transmits between humans by mosquitos and is endemic to many countries in tropical and subtropical regions. It has been an increasing public health concern due to increasing outbreaks over the last decade. All 4 types of Dengue cause acute infections in humans but are not known to cause chronic infections.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            75% of dengue infections are asymptomatic. However, 2-5% of dengue can progress to severe dengue.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            There are 3 phases of dengue:

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            • Febrile phase (2-7 days): Rapid onset of high fever, headache, joint pain, eye pain, myalgia, nausea, vomiting, and a macular or maculopapular rash
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              • Minor bleeding and petechiae can be elicited by the tourniquet test (inflation to halfway between SBP and DBP x5 min, +ve test if >10 new petechiae appear in a 1 square inch of skin within 1-2 min of cuff deflation)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              • Blood work may show leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and mild liver enzyme elevation
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              • Confirmatory test for dengue: Viral molecular testing and IgM levels (positive within 4-7 days of infection
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              • Critical phase (severe cases only): Plasma leakage leading to shock, bleeding, and organ dysfunction
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                • Treatment: IV fluid resuscitation and supportive care
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                • Risk factors for developing into severe dengue include extremes of age, immunosuppression, baseline comorbidities, and previous dengue infection
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                • Recovery phase: Resolution of plasma leakage and hemorrhage. Reabsorption of extravasated fluids
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  • Some may develop further rashes or severe post-viral fatigue lasting days to weeks
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  • The updated WHO classification system for dengue includes dengue, dengue with warning signs, or severe dengue. Consider the diagnosis of dengue in patients coming from an endemic area who have fever and any 2 of: aches, rash, nausea, vomiting, leukopenia, and positive tourniquet test.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    Warning signs for severe dengue:

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    • Intense, continuous abdominal pain or tenderness
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    • Persistent vomiting
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    • Fluid accumulation (e.g. ascities, pleural effusion)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    • Mucosal bleeding
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    • Altered mental status
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    • Hepatomegaly
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    • Rapidly rising hematocrit (in measures six hours apart)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    • Severe dengue = shock, clinically significant bleeding, or severe organ impairment

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      There are no specific therapies or vaccines for Dengue. Management is primarily supportive:

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      • Mild cases without warning signs: Outpatient management with close follow up, oral hydration, and tylenol for fever
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        • Avoid NSAIDs and steroids (increased risk of GI bleed)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        • Patients with risk factors (e.g. age, comorbidities): consider admission for close observation
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        • Patients with warning signs: admission and IV fluid resuscitation with isotonic fluids (10mL/kg over 1 hour) followed by reassessment and gradual tapering of IV fluids
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        • Severe dengue: ICU level care with large volume resuscitation (consider IV colloids if not responsive to aggressive crystalloids).
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          • Prophylactic platelet transfusion is not recommended
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          • Bottom line: Dengue is self-limiting in most cases but can be life-threatening in 2-5% of patients. Management of dengue is primarily supportive with oral or IV fluid resuscitation.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            Expand to view reference list

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            Imaging decision making in geriatric trauma

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            Falls in the older patient can result in significant injuries despite seemingly minor mechanisms.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            • For example, there is a 2-5x higher mortality rate in patients >65 with rib fractures, with increasing mortality rates up to 11% and 35% with 6 and >8 rib fractures, respectively
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            • Pre-existing imaging rules may not have inclusion criteria that fit common patient presentations
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            • CT imaging considerations:

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              • CT Head/C-Spine: Low threshold if patient >65, or other risk factors such as being on anticoagulants, or a high-risk mechanism.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                • Consider no imaging in patients without the main predictors of C-spine injury: head injury, neck pain, and increasing age
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                • CT Chest/Abdomen/Pelvis: Consider if chest X-ray is abnormal or if chest X-ray is normal but significant pain is present.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  • 16% of patients >65 and 28% of patient >85 with blunt chest trauma develop a complication such as pneumonia or respiratory failure
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  • Chest X-rays demonstrate rib fractures only 50% of the time
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  • There is conflicting data on whether older patients with radiographically occult injuries e.g. rib fractures require admission
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  • The Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) developed an imaging decision algorithm for the evaluation of blunt trauma patients > 65 although it has not received external validation. They recommend:

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    • CT Head and C-spine for all
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    • CT Chest/Abdomen/Pelvis if there are abnormal torso findings or high-risk factors
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    • Full CT spine if imaging Chest/Abdo/Pelvis: there is a 15% chance of another fracture elsewhere in the spine with any vertebral fracture
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    •  

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      Expand to view reference list

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      TTP recognition and management

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a rare but important disorder as it is associated with a mortality rate of 4-30%, even with early recognition and treatment.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      In TTP, enzyme ADAMTS13 (responsible for cleaving large von Willebrand factor (vWF) becomes dysfunctional, resulting in large vWF multimers which accumulates in platelets, form clots, and destroys RBCs, leading to thrombocytopenia and hemolysis.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      The classic pentad is seen in less than 7% of patients with TTP, and many of these findings can be transient:

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      • Thrombocytopenia (petechiae, purpura in ~50%)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      • Microangiopathic hemolytic anemia
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      • Fever (seen in ~10% of cases)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      • Neurologic symptoms
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        • 40% of patients may have confusion, seizures, stroke
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        • ~25% of patient swill have minor symptoms including headache or transient confusion
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        • Up to 1/3 of patients have no neurologic symptoms
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        • Acute renal injury
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        • Lab work for TTP

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          • End organ dysfunction: renal and liver dysfunction
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          • Hemolytic anemia: Hgb <10 g/dL, platelet <150 x10^9/L., ADAMTS13 activity level <10%, schistocyte on blood smear, increased indirect bilirubin, increased LDH, decreased haptoglobin, reticulocytosis
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          • Others: HIV, coagulation panel with normal INR, D-dimer, normal fibrinogen, troponin, urinalysis
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          • A PLASMIC Score ≥5 has a 99% sensitivity and 57% specificity for TTP (incorporates elements including platelet count, hemolysis, active cancer, solid organ or stem cell transplant, low MCV, INR <1.5, Cr <2mg/dL).

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            Management of TTP:

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            1. Address the underlying etiology and end organ dysfunction
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            2. Consultation with hematology
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            3. Focused treatment of TTP: FFP (limited success), plasma exchange therapy, and methylprednisolone 1mg/kg/d. Rituximab (limited evidence from RCTs)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              1. Active bleeding is rare and transfusions are generally not necessary
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              2. Platelet transfusions can be given if patients have major bleeding or are severely thrombocytopenic (current evidence suggests no significant impact on mortality)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              3. Low-molecular weight heparin + ASA for patients with platelet >50 as thromboembolic prophylaxis
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              4. Bottom line: Patients with TTP may not present with all elements of the classic pentad. Early identification and therapy can significantly improve mortality. The PLASMIC score can be used to assist in identifying patients with TTP.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                The post PODCAST: EM Quick Hits 63 S-TEC and HUS, IM Epinephrine in OHCA, Dengue, Geriatric Trauma Imaging, TTP first appeared on האיגוד הישראלי לרפואה דחופה.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                1 hr 7 min

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              About summary - האיגוד הישראלי לרפואה דחופה

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              From the publisher's feed

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              The Israel Association for Emergency Medicine