Argued 10/30/2017.

Description from Oyez.org:

"A case in which the Court will decide whether investigative services under 18 U.S.C. §3599(f) are only “reasonably necessary” when the habeas petitioner requesting the services can meet the burden of proof for the underlying claim for habeas relief at the time of the request for the investigative services."

Argued 10/11/2017.

Description from Oyez.org:

"A case in which the Court will decide whether the Alien Tort Statute prohibits corporate liability."

Argued 10/11/2017.

Description from Oyez.org:

"A case in which the Court will decide whether the Clean Water Act grants federal courts of appeals jurisdiction to review the Environmental Protection Agency’s rule that defines the scope of United States waters."

Argued 10/10/2017.

Description from Oyez.org:

"A case in which Court held that Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5)(C), which places a time limit on appeals, is not jurisdictional because it is a court-made rule rather than a statute."

Argued 10/4/2017.

Description from Oyez.org:

"A case in which the Court will decide whether a guilty plea inherently waives a defendant’s right to challenge the constitutionality of his conviction."

Argued 10/4/2017.

Description from Oyez.org:

"A case in which the Court will decide whether officers have probable cause to arrest for unlawful entry under D.C. law despite a claim of good-faith entry and whether the relevant law was sufficiently clearly established to justify the denial of immunity to the officers."

Argued 10/3/2017.

Description from Oyez.org:

"A case in which the Court will determine whether noncitizens who are subject to mandatory detention under the Immigration and Nationality Act are entitled to bond hearings with the possibility of release if they are detained for longer than six months. The Court will also determine whether the government’s burden is to prove by clear and convincing evidence that they are dangerous to their communities and represent flight risks."

Argued 10/3/2017.

Description from Oyez.org:

"A case in which the Court will decide whether partisan gerrymandering claims are justiciable, and whether the district court erred in striking down Wisconsin’s redistricting plan as an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander."

Re-argued 10/2/2017. First argued 1/17/2017.

Description from Oyez.org:

"A case in which the Court will decide whether the Immigration and Nationality Act’s “crime of violence” provision is unconstitutionally vague under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment."

Argued on 10/2/2017.

Description from Oyez.org:

"A case in which the Court will decide whether the National Labor Relations Act prohibits enforcement of an agreement requiring employees to resolve disputes with the employer through individual arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act."