The jury system sits at the heart of the justice system, trusted to deliver fair and impartial verdicts. But in an age of 24-hour news, viral trials, and social media commentary, does trial by jury still work as it was intended?
In this episode of Surrey Speaks, Dr Emily Finch, criminologist, criminal lawyer and Senior Lecturer in Law at the University of Surrey, joins Georgie and Ness to put the jury system on trial.
The discussion explores how juries are meant to function in theory and whether that ideal holds up in practice. Dr Finch examines how emotion, media coverage and online discourse can influence juror decision-making, drawing on high-profile cases such as the Johnny Depp and Amber Heard trial, alongside examples closer to home in the UK.
The episode also looks at whether juries can ever be truly impartial. It considers how jurors are selected, how effective current safeguards are at filtering bias, and how factors such as race, gender and socioeconomic background can shape verdicts.
With cameras now entering some UK courtrooms for the first time, the conversation asks whether greater transparency strengthens justice or risks turning trials into performances. Dr Finch also unpacks whether jurors understand complex legal language, how majority verdicts work, and whether compromise decisions always lead to justice.
Finally, the episode compares jury-led systems with judge-only trials used in other countries and asks a bigger question: if we were rebuilding the justice system from scratch, would juries still exist at all?
A timely and thought-provoking episode for anyone interested in criminal justice, legal reform, and how society decides guilt and innocence.