
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Sara Labaton, the Director of Teaching and Learning at the Shalom Hartman Institute of North America, recently taught a group of local rabbis. She observed that the prophetic ideals of peace (lion lies down the with lamb, nations will beat swords into ploughshares, neither will they know war anymore) are so lofty as to be unattainable. Would we be better off looking towards rabbinic ideals of peace?
The good news for rabbinic ideals of peace: not lofty. Not utopian.
The bad news: rabbinic ideals of peace are small, local, and very imperfect.
On Shabbat we will consider a fascinating source about a most imperfect, indeed troubling peace. Three things about this source are striking.
One the genre. It is sheilah u’teshuva, a legal question and answer, a responsum. Not a genre we have studied before.
Two, the author is Ovadia Yosef, zichrono livracha, who was the Orthodox Chief Rabbi of the Sephardi community in Israel and throughout the world. He was incredibly learned and inspired passionate devotion among his followers. When he died in 2013, 800,000 people attended his funeral, the largest funeral in the history of Israel.
Three, the fact pattern. A young woman has sex outside of marriage, gets pregnant, and has an abortion. Later, she becomes very observant, marries a yeshiva bocher, gets pregnant, has a baby boy. She never tells her husband about her abortion. When their child is born, the husband wants to do a ceremony called pidyon haben, the redemption of the first-born boy. Since she had had an abortion, she was not eligible for the pidyon haben. But he did not know. Would it be better to tell the truth, and not have the pidyon haben? Or to perpetuate the omission, and have the pidyon haben that she was not eligible to have, in which case the ceremony would contain a blessing that should not have been said?
Read this short, saucy case. What did Ovadia Yosef decide? Why? Do you agree with his decision? How would you assess pros and cons? What do we learn from his decision that could apply to our very different world?
Is an imperfect peace worth pursuing? Is local peace an adequate response to a world on fire?
5
88 ratings
Sara Labaton, the Director of Teaching and Learning at the Shalom Hartman Institute of North America, recently taught a group of local rabbis. She observed that the prophetic ideals of peace (lion lies down the with lamb, nations will beat swords into ploughshares, neither will they know war anymore) are so lofty as to be unattainable. Would we be better off looking towards rabbinic ideals of peace?
The good news for rabbinic ideals of peace: not lofty. Not utopian.
The bad news: rabbinic ideals of peace are small, local, and very imperfect.
On Shabbat we will consider a fascinating source about a most imperfect, indeed troubling peace. Three things about this source are striking.
One the genre. It is sheilah u’teshuva, a legal question and answer, a responsum. Not a genre we have studied before.
Two, the author is Ovadia Yosef, zichrono livracha, who was the Orthodox Chief Rabbi of the Sephardi community in Israel and throughout the world. He was incredibly learned and inspired passionate devotion among his followers. When he died in 2013, 800,000 people attended his funeral, the largest funeral in the history of Israel.
Three, the fact pattern. A young woman has sex outside of marriage, gets pregnant, and has an abortion. Later, she becomes very observant, marries a yeshiva bocher, gets pregnant, has a baby boy. She never tells her husband about her abortion. When their child is born, the husband wants to do a ceremony called pidyon haben, the redemption of the first-born boy. Since she had had an abortion, she was not eligible for the pidyon haben. But he did not know. Would it be better to tell the truth, and not have the pidyon haben? Or to perpetuate the omission, and have the pidyon haben that she was not eligible to have, in which case the ceremony would contain a blessing that should not have been said?
Read this short, saucy case. What did Ovadia Yosef decide? Why? Do you agree with his decision? How would you assess pros and cons? What do we learn from his decision that could apply to our very different world?
Is an imperfect peace worth pursuing? Is local peace an adequate response to a world on fire?
90,828 Listeners
6,522 Listeners
535 Listeners
1,211 Listeners
110,824 Listeners
201 Listeners
428 Listeners
3,041 Listeners
1,034 Listeners
15,363 Listeners
8,560 Listeners
67 Listeners
665 Listeners