Iran has publicly contradicted Donald Trump’s announcement that negotiations between Washington and Tehran are under way, creating another extraordinary dispute over whether diplomacy is quietly advancing behind the scenes or whether the two governments are describing completely different processes.
Speaking aboard Air Force One on Sunday, President Trump said talks with Iran would begin on Monday afternoon after he cancelled a major American attack that he claimed would have been devastating for the Islamic Republic.
“Would I rather make a deal? I’m not looking to kill people,” Trump told reporters.
He said the United States was now talking to Iran “in the form of a negotiation” and suggested that an agreement covering the Strait of Hormuz was imminent, with the eventual denuclearisation of Iran also on the table.
Iran, however, issued an emphatic denial.
Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei said Tehran was not negotiating with the United States and had no meetings scheduled with American representatives. According to Baghaei, Iran’s existing discussions were with Oman and concerned the creation of a safe shipping route through the Strait of Hormuz.
That distinction may be technically accurate. But it does not necessarily mean Trump invented the diplomatic process.
Oman has repeatedly operated as an intermediary between Washington and Tehran. A negotiation carried through Omani mediators can still amount, in practical terms, to negotiations between the United States and Iran — even when Iranian and American officials never enter the same room.
The disagreement may therefore be less about whether messages are being exchanged and more about what each government is politically willing to call them.