Experts discuss the different legal standards applied to racial discrimination claims brought under §1981 and Title VII, as well as the Court’s hesitation to broaden Bivens claims to cover cross-border shootings.

Experts discuss the different legal standards applied to racial discrimination claims brought under §1981 and Title VII, as well as the Court’s hesitation to broaden Bivens claims to cover cross-border shootings.

Experts analyze what the Executive must do to properly rescind DACA, and when Due Process rights attach to immigrants that have crossed the U.S. border.

Experts analyze what the Executive must do to properly rescind DACA, and when Due Process rights attach to immigrants that have crossed the U.S. border.

Experts discuss the impact of agency for cause termination provisions and the potential unconstitutional restraint on Executive Power they create.

Experts discuss how subpoenas issued to third parties for the personal records of a sitting President impact the Separation of Powers doctrine, as well as the Court’s rejection of Executive claims of absolute immunity.

Experts discuss the impact of agency for cause termination provisions and the potential unconstitutional restraint on Executive Power they create.

Experts discuss how subpoenas issued to third parties for the personal records of a sitting President impact the Separation of Powers doctrine, as well as the Court’s rejection of Executive claims of absolute immunity.

Experts discuss a criminal law jurisdictional ruling impacting nearly half of Oklahoma land and with implications across a broad array of laws and regulations. Also discussed is how Kansas v. Glover’s narrow holding prompts questions about future interpretations of reasonable suspicion traffic stops if applied to the many possible differing factual scenarios.

Experts discuss a criminal law jurisdictional ruling impacting nearly half of Oklahoma land and with implications across a broad array of laws and regulations. Also discussed is how Kansas v. Glover’s narrow holding prompts questions about future interpretations of reasonable suspicion traffic stops if applied to the many possible differing factual scenarios.