Term Talk

Groff v. DeJoy. Civil Rights. Title VII. Dean Erwin Chemerinsky and Professor Michael McConnell discuss the term’s case likely to have the greatest impact on the lower courts. The Supreme Court’s substantial cost standard increases the burden on employers to provide religious accommodations to employees and will prompt litigation necessary to define the new standard.

Health and Hospital Corporation of Marion County v. Talevski. Civil Rights. §1983. Dean Erwin Chemerinsky and Professor Michael McConnell analyze §1983 enforcement of Spending Clause legislation, and the limitations on bringing private causes of action.

Erwin Chemerinsky is the Dean and Jesse H. Choper Distinguished Professor of Law at the University of California, Berkeley School of Law. Michael McConnell was a judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, and is the Richard and Francis Mallery Professor of Law, and Director of the Constitutional Law Center, at Stanford University Law School.

Groff v. DeJoy. Civil Rights. Title VII. Dean Erwin Chemerinsky and Professor Michael McConnell discuss the term’s case likely to have the greatest impact on the lower courts. The Supreme Court’s substantial cost standard increases the burden on employers to provide religious accommodations to employees and will prompt litigation necessary to define the new standard.

Health and Hospital Corporation of Marion County v. Talevski. Civil Rights. §1983. Dean Erwin Chemerinsky and Professor Michael McConnell analyze §1983 enforcement of Spending Clause legislation, and the limitations on bringing private causes of action.

Erwin Chemerinsky is the Dean and Jesse H. Choper Distinguished Professor of Law at the University of California, Berkeley School of Law. Michael McConnell was a judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, and is the Richard and Francis Mallery Professor of Law, and Director of the Constitutional Law Center, at Stanford University Law School.

303 Creative LLC v. Elenis. First Amendment. Dean Erwin Chemerinsky and Professor Tara Grove discuss the emerging artistic expression exception to public accommodations and anti-discrimination laws.

Erwin Chemerinsky is the Dean and Jesse H. Choper Distinguished Professor of Law at the University of California, Berkeley School of Law. Tara Grove is a Professor and the Vinson and Elkins Chair at the University of Texas at Austin, School of Law.

303 Creative LLC v. Elenis. First Amendment. Dean Erwin Chemerinsky and Professor Tara Grove discuss the emerging artistic expression exception to public accommodations and anti-discrimination laws.

Erwin Chemerinsky is the Dean and Jesse H. Choper Distinguished Professor of Law at the University of California, Berkeley School of Law. Tara Grove is a Professor and the Vinson and Elkins Chair at the University of Texas at Austin, School of Law.

Dean Erwin Chemerinsky and Professor Michael McConnell, former Judge for the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, analyze the Supreme Court’s reaffirmation and application of the Thornburg v. Gingles test to districting questions in Alabama.

Dean Erwin Chemerinsky and Professor Michael McConnell, former Judge for the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, analyze the Supreme Court’s reaffirmation and application of the Thornburg v. Gingles test to districting questions in Alabama.

Dean Erwin Chemerinsky and Professor Michael McConnell, former Judge for the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, discuss the Supreme Court’s rejection of the Independent State Legislature Theory.

Dean Erwin Chemerinsky and Professor Michael McConnell, former Judge for the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, discuss the Supreme Court’s rejection of the Independent State Legislature Theory.

Experts discuss the Court’s elevated clear statement rule in Biden v. Nebraska, and a potentially diminishing special solicitude toward state standing in United States v. Texas.

Experts discuss the Court’s elevated clear statement rule in Biden v. Nebraska, and a potentially diminishing special solicitude toward state standing in United States v. Texas.