
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


When the deal is signed but not yet closed, a material adverse change clause can mean everything. In this episode, Lucas and Luna dissect a 2024 acquisition where a buyer invoked the MAC clause to back out of a $300 million deal — and paid a $45 million reverse termination fee after a court ruled the change didn't qualify. You'll learn what counts as a MAC, why courts view them with skepticism, and how to draft a clause that actually protects you without scaring off the seller. With real examples and practical takeaways, this is a must-listen for anyone buying or selling a business.
#MaterialAdverseChange #MACClause #MADeals #Acquisition #BuyerProtection #DealRisk #LegalDrafting #MergersAndAcquisitions #BusinessLaw #DealTerms #Mergers #Buyouts #BusinessSales #FexingoBusiness #BusinessPodcast #MALitigation #ReverseTerminationFee #ContractLaw
Keep every episode free: buymeacoffee.com/fexingo
Episode 147 of The Acquisition Talk dives into one of the most misunderstood provisions in M&A purchase agreements: the anti-sandbagging clause. Most sellers assume that if they hide a problem, the buyer can sue after closing. But an anti-sandbagging clause flips that logic—it says the buyer cannot bring a claim for breaches they knew about or reasonably should have discovered before signing. Lucas and Luna walk through the case of OmniCorp's $150 million acquisition of DataStream Analytics. OmniCorp's due diligence flagged a possible revenue recognition issue, but they didn't dig deeper. After closing, the issue turned into a $20 million write-down. Because the contract included a pro-buyer (or 'sandbagging') clause, they couldn't recover a dime. This episode explains the two types of clauses—pro-buyer and pro-seller—and why this distinction can make or break a deal. Listeners will learn how to negotiate this clause, what 'knowledge' means in legal terms, and why both sides need to be crystal clear on the language. A must-listen for anyone buying or selling a mid-market company.
#MergersAndAcquisitions #AntiSandbaggingClause #PurchaseAgreement #MADeals #BusinessSeller #BusinessBuyer #FexingoBusiness #BusinessPodcast #AcquisitionTalk #Mergers #Buyouts #BusinessSales #Operators #LegalTrap #MergersAndAcquisitionsLaw #DueDiligence #RiskAllocation #ContractNegotiation
Keep every episode free: buymeacoffee.com/fexingo
In this episode of The Acquisition Talk, Lucas and Luna examine a costly M&A mistake: failing to verify intellectual property ownership before closing. They walk through a real-world case where a buyer lost $40 million because a critical patent wasn't properly assigned from an inventor to the target company. Discover why IP due diligence goes beyond checking patent filings, how 'chain of title' gaps arise, and what operators can do to avoid this expensive trap. Perfect for business owners, acquisition entrepreneurs, and M&A professionals.
#IntellectualProperty #MergersAndAcquisitions #DueDiligence #PatentAssignment #ChainOfTitle #BusinessAcquisition #Mistake #OperatorAdvice #DealLesson #AcquisitionTrap #Business #Entrepreneurship #FexingoBusiness #BusinessPodcast #MAndA #Trap #RiskManagement #IPRights
Keep every episode free: buymeacoffee.com/fexingo
M&A contracts often include a Material Adverse Change (MAC) clause, allowing buyers to walk away if something fundamentally harms the target. But these clauses are notoriously hard to invoke. In this episode, we dissect a case where a buyer tried to invoke a MAC after a raw material price spike caused a 30% earnings drop at a specialty chemicals company. The seller fought back, a court ruled the downturn was industry-wide and foreseeable, and the buyer lost $45 million in legal fees and settlement. Lucas and Luna explore how narrowly courts interpret MAC clauses, why vague language is dangerous, and how buyers can draft more protective provisions. They also share tips on negotiating for specific 'carve-outs' and ensuring that earnings-based triggers are explicitly tied to the deal's valuation assumptions.
#MergersAndAcquisitions #MaterialAdverseChange #MACClause #BuyerBeware #ContractDrafting #MAndATrap #DealMaking #PrivateEquity #Litigation #BusinessPodcast #FexingoBusiness #AcquisitionTalk #CorporateLaw #DueDiligence #DealStructure #AcquisitionTrap #EarningsDrop #LegalRisk
Keep every episode free: buymeacoffee.com/fexingo
In this episode of The Acquisition Talk, hosts Lucas and Luna dissect a six-figure M&A mistake: a seller who lost $25 million after a buyer invoked a loosely worded financing condition when interest rates rose. The seller had turned down a competing all-cash offer because the winning buyer promised a faster close. But the purchase agreement's financing condition allowed the buyer to walk without penalty when debt markets tightened—even though the buyer had ample equity to close. Lucas explains how the 'reasonable best efforts' language was too weak to force the buyer to use its own capital. Luna asks about the role of reverse breakup fees and whether the seller's advisor should have flagged the risk. The episode provides concrete tips for sellers: require the buyer to waive the financing condition by a certain date, demand a cash deposit, or insist on a 'certain funds' clause. They also explore how the seller could have negotiated for the buyer to assume the financing risk entirely. The case underscores that not all offers are equal—and that deal certainty often comes with a price tag.
#MergersAndAcquisitions #Business #Finance #MA #FinancingCondition #Seller #Pitfall #FexingoBusiness #BusinessPodcast #AcquisitionTalk #DealMaking #DueDiligence #TermSheet #PrivateEquity #ExitPlanning #Legal #CorporateFinance #Risk
Keep every episode free: buymeacoffee.com/fexingo
In M&A, the indemnification basket is often a routine clause—until it isn't. This episode unpacks the difference between a 'deductible' basket and a 'tipping' basket, and how one software company seller lost $12 million because they assumed a $500,000 threshold worked like an excess policy. Lucas and Luna walk through the exact contract language that hooked a family office, the negotiation that should have happened, and the painful lesson about reading baskets on a net-loss basis. If you're selling a business, this is one clause you cannot afford to skim.
#MAndA #Acquisitions #BusinessDeals #Indemnification #ContractTrap #SellerBeware #DealStructure #DueDiligence #LegalRisk #PrivateEquity #MiddleMarket #BusinessPodcast #FexingoBusiness #AcquisitionTalk #LucasAndLuna #Episode143 #MergersAndAcquisitions #IndemnityBasket
Keep every episode free: buymeacoffee.com/fexingo
In M&A, environmental liabilities can lurk beneath the surface. This episode of The Acquisition Talk with Fexingo examines a case where a seller of a Midwestern bottling plant faced a $15 million indemnity claim after the buyer discovered decades-old soil contamination. Lucas and Luna walk through how the contamination was missed during due diligence, the indemnity clause that triggered the loss, and the operational lessons for sellers who think they have clean property. They also discuss when to buy environmental insurance and how to negotiate scope limitations on indemnities. A practical episode for operators selling businesses with any industrial or real estate footprint.
#EnvironmentalLiability #IndemnityClause #DueDiligence #MergersAndAcquisitions #SellersTrap #SoilContamination #BusinessSale #AcquisitionTalk #MADeal #OperatorLessons #LiabilityTransfer #BottlingPlant #MidwestBusiness #EnvironmentalInsurance #TransactionStructuring #Business #FexingoBusiness #BusinessPodcast
Keep every episode free: buymeacoffee.com/fexingo
In this episode, Lucas and Luna dissect a $25 million M&A disaster caused by a poorly drafted non-compete clause. When OmniCorp acquired software firm DataSync, they relied on a standard non-compete from the seller's CEO. But a single loophole—defining 'competitive business' too narrowly—allowed that CEO to launch a nearly identical company just six months later, poaching key clients and employees. The result: OmniCorp's projected synergies evaporated, and a lawsuit consumed millions more. Lucas breaks down the exact language that failed, how buyers can audit non-compete scope, and why a 'blue pencil' jurisdiction doesn't always save you. Luna shares a cautionary tale from the 2018 acquisition of HubSpot's competitor where a similar oversight led to a $12 million earnout dispute. They also discuss the importance of defining affiliates, passive ownership exceptions, and geographic breadth. Key takeaways: never accept boilerplate non-competes in acquisition agreements; always map the non-compete to the target's actual business lines and future expansion plans; and consider a garden leave clause as a backup. Plus, a behind-the-scenes look at how listener support keeps The Acquisition Talk ad-free.
#NonCompete #MergersAndAcquisitions #BusinessLaw #DealStructuring #AcquisitionTrap #DueDiligence #OmniCorp #DataSync #PostCloseLitigation #BluePencil #GardenLeave #Earnout #Business #Finance #FexingoBusiness #BusinessPodcast #AcquisitionTalk #MALegal
Keep every episode free: buymeacoffee.com/fexingo
When a private equity firm acquired a SaaS company for $200 million, they assumed a 70% revenue concentration was a strength—until the customer renegotiated, costing them $40 million. This episode of The Acquisition Talk with Fexingo explores how buyers can identify, price, and protect against customer concentration risk in M&A deals. Lucas and Luna discuss specific deal structures including revenue covenants, earnouts tied to key customer retention, and adjusted valuation multiples. They also share real negotiation tactics for seller pushback. A must-listen for any operator or investor evaluating a target with concentrated revenue.
#CustomerConcentration #M&A #MergerAndAcquisition #DueDiligence #RevenueRisk #PrivateEquity #SaaS #Acquisition #BusinessPodcast #FexingoBusiness #DealStructuring #Earnout #Valuation #RiskManagement #Negotiation #LucasAndLuna #Operators #BusinessSales
Keep every episode free: buymeacoffee.com/fexingo
In 2024, a private equity firm acquired a fast-growing SaaS company for $300 million. The founder and CEO was critical to client relationships and product vision. The buyer included a generous retention package with a $2 million signing bonus and a guaranteed three-year earnout that paid out regardless of performance. But the CEO left after 18 months, collecting the remaining earnout as a 'good leaver'. A weak non-compete allowed him to consult for a competitor, and the buyer lost its largest client. The acquisition's value dropped by $50 million. This episode dissects the hidden traps in management retention agreements: how guaranteed payments, loose non-competes, and lack of performance hooks can turn retention into an expensive liability. Lucas and Luna explore real-world fixes: performance-based vesting, broader non-competes, clawback clauses, and equity-based incentives. If you're buying a founder-led business, this episode reveals why key-person retention deserves as much scrutiny as financial due diligence.
#MergersAndAcquisitions #ManagementRetention #KeyPerson #PrivateEquity #SaaS #DealStructure #Incentives #DueDiligence #RetentionAgreement #GoldenHandcuffs #ClientLoss #ValueDestruction #Trap #Business #Finance #FexingoBusiness #BusinessPodcast #Acquisition
Keep every episode free: buymeacoffee.com/fexingo
From the publisher's feed