Split Decisions pits veteran family law attorneys Tim Miranda and Carlos Tavares against each other in mock-trial debates that show how powerful legal arguments can shape a case: and change the outcome! Each has 4 minutes or less to make their case. You be the judge. 

In this head-to-head mock trial, they argue opposing sides of a high-stakes question: Should a restraining order be granted when one spouse alleges domestic abuse, but the other denies it ever happened?

The Case:
- A couple married for 23 years with two teenage children.
- The wife claims years of intimidation, stalking through technology, and verbal abuse.
- The husband says it’s exaggeration—admitting to drinking, swearing, and joking with the Tesla app, but denying abuse.

The Debate:
Carlos argues the wife’s safety and peace of mind require court protection.
Tim insists the evidence falls short of what the law demands.

You be the judge. Cast your verdict in the comments and poll — whose argument wins?

Follow for more legal battles, sharp insights, and real courtroom strategies from The AM Sidebar.

Can you really sue the city if a cracked sidewalk or busted roadway causes your injury? In this debut episode of Law on Edge on The AM Sidebar, California trial attorney Eric Ganci breaks down Restivo v. City of Petaluma and explains what it takes to prove government liability under California Government Code §835.

From skateboards to courtroom strategy, Eric reveals why proving “notice” is the key to winning these cases, how this ruling compares to Ortega v. Kmart, and what both trial lawyers and everyday citizens need to know when the streets aren’t safe.

Law on Edge is your weekly legal edge: sharp insights on California’s newest laws, courtroom strategies, and headline-worthy cases: all in 10 minutes or less!