
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Dan Huff, former White House attorney, is sounding the alarm in a powerful Wall Street Journal op-ed. Huff argues that Judge Boasberg’s deportation order—and dozens of similar injunctions—are legally invalid because they fail to impose the mandatory bond required under Rule 65(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Without such bonds, these rulings may not be legally enforceable.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
By Sean Hannity4
97399,739 ratings
Dan Huff, former White House attorney, is sounding the alarm in a powerful Wall Street Journal op-ed. Huff argues that Judge Boasberg’s deportation order—and dozens of similar injunctions—are legally invalid because they fail to impose the mandatory bond required under Rule 65(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Without such bonds, these rulings may not be legally enforceable.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

23,425 Listeners

26,300 Listeners

2,317 Listeners

62,894 Listeners

12,951 Listeners

4,055 Listeners

3,399 Listeners

5,667 Listeners

779 Listeners

6,555 Listeners

254 Listeners

6,579 Listeners

44,099 Listeners

11,886 Listeners

40,473 Listeners

197 Listeners