
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Dan Huff, former White House attorney, is sounding the alarm in a powerful Wall Street Journal op-ed. Huff argues that Judge Boasberg’s deportation order—and dozens of similar injunctions—are legally invalid because they fail to impose the mandatory bond required under Rule 65(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Without such bonds, these rulings may not be legally enforceable.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
4
96669,666 ratings
Dan Huff, former White House attorney, is sounding the alarm in a powerful Wall Street Journal op-ed. Huff argues that Judge Boasberg’s deportation order—and dozens of similar injunctions—are legally invalid because they fail to impose the mandatory bond required under Rule 65(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Without such bonds, these rulings may not be legally enforceable.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
23,650 Listeners
2,358 Listeners
25,478 Listeners
63,416 Listeners
13,020 Listeners
4,006 Listeners
3,390 Listeners
5,726 Listeners
767 Listeners
48,820 Listeners
257 Listeners
6,398 Listeners
44,235 Listeners
11,886 Listeners
38,742 Listeners
118 Listeners