I would. Now, of course, he was not the but would now like to speak to the additional Solicitor general of India and also the member of the Bharatiya Janata Party National Executive Committee of BJP. Mr. Satya Pal, join Mr Jain. My first question to you is in this case, we saw an attempt to first show are in Khan as a consumer that was the basic grounds on which he was arrested. And the later and argument was made that he was in touch with an international drug cartel, a member who may be in touch with an international drug cartel, a charge which has been denied by his lawyers. So do you feel that there is a definite situation where the law is misused by agencies? See, I I am not aware of the effects of the state because I never appeared as a year. But I have run ready judgement of the special where he declined bail to all these people. The findings by a judicial officer he has been don't have the judgement of the court with us at the moment. Today also does not, he says. He says it was a conscious violation of this below. He knew about it. Number two, he says. I have seen the perceptive which have been shown to the honourable judge, and worship chairs nowadays are admissible in the courts. They are taken into consideration. They you made a 67 and all that. I am not going her real Cordy finding that is not there simple up to seeing the chest. The special that says it's the international and is a part of it. It's a conspiracy and the international level. Therefore, I think it will be too premature to say that in this case and C P has been wild weather. Let's away for the judgement of the high Court, Mr Jane, while you say we must await the judgement of the high court, you're saying and highlighting what the session's court said in terms of merits for not granting bail. However, the same merits were not considered by the high court, and they have granted Bill C. C nor saying the marriage is a defensive and i'ma tell you 1000 cases it Bailey's granted. Ultimately, you maybe barely declined. Ultimately heavy thousands of cases we have seen thousands location and I said yesterday also, these circumstances under which these three persons have been arrested and one court says, don't know bail, other courses and finally thousands of people, thousands of people under the I will be very happy as a lawyer if the Delhi High Court and after that Supreme Court comes out with clear cut directions on the issue of Grant of It left an impression not go to the people that the law of this land is different For big people, the law of the land is different. For a former for a common man, the son of a farmer's you will be not surprised, shocked, shocked the extent to which this drug manners is going, taking the lives of the people daily in the local newspaper we're ready for. Somebody died in to people like there because of the excessive use to person there, and they're therefore, I she let there be clear cut guidelines by the high court or the river for bands, for others for release on bail, and not that simply because we're a big man. Your case will be heard within three weeks and got the pigments that well known in James James up the big man's contention is that he is being victimised because he is a big man. I think that's the point that that Bollywood is a soft target and that's why they're being targeted because they are a big man, not because they're not. Now. My final question, Mr Jain, is that there is a view that first time consumers of drugs must be let off with a warning because they're not criminals. You have to look at in whether a person is actually a criminal or is a repeat offender. You think the law can move in this direction? I don't think there can be really hard and fast food on their It all depends from the of it Differs from individual to individual. Aye, three things. Number one attempt should be left. The real culprits don't goes for free. They're finished. Two innocent or not touch. They are not allowed to be arrest people, the the those who have come into it. Maybe first time, Second time, third time, all possible attempt should be made to bring them out of it. And in Punjab, we have seen people who ultimately became victim of the drug were able to come out of it. because of the addiction. But I can't think that they can see a be taken against you. That everybody will say how you prove. Probably prove that everybody will. First traffic violations. I am the first violators. Morrow, murder, accused militia. And the first accused, Moreau, the rapist will drive. I don't think as a metro for principal for medicine has a metro. You can introduce it in the criminal. Sure, I I respect your arguments. Thank you very much, Mr Jain, for joining us.
