The answer is uncomfortable: the better the AI gets at reading your logs, the more logs your developers will send it.
Bolt an agent onto an observability platform and you haven't changed the cost structure — you've given everyone a reason to feed it more. The storage bill was always the bill.
Anthony Critelli is a career firefighter and an independent consultant who spent over a decade in tech, so he's seen both sides of the fire drill. Nati sits down with him to ask what's actually happening inside customer environments, underneath the AI pitch decks.
The conversation gets to a question most observability tools quietly avoid: when you're investigating an incident, would you rather have all the evidence, or a witness?
Today we ship every log to a remote lake and reconstruct what happened in retrospect. Anthony's point is that you don't need the witness to carry pieces of the car back to the crime lab. You ask them what they saw.
Also in this one: why DevOps is an ideology and not a job title, why "you build it, you run it" is really "until it breaks," why an agent still needs a deterministic substrate underneath it, and why a 90% accurate agent walking a ten-step rollback is not a 90% accurate rollback.