Electricity costs are rising across the U.S., and for many businesses, municipalities, and institutions, power has become a top-three operating expense. Even organizations that haven’t changed their energy usage are paying more — and it’s not temporary.

In this episode of The Clean Energy Edge, we break down why electricity prices keep climbing and why waiting for political or regulatory fixes won’t protect your budget. Exploding demand from AI data centers, electrification, population growth, and extreme weather is forcing utilities to build new infrastructure — and those costs are being passed on to everyone through higher rates, demand charges, grid riders, and fuel adjustments.

The key takeaway is simple: you don’t fight rising grid costs politically — you opt out economically.

Sponsored by NXTGEN Clean Energy Solutions

In this episode, we cover:

Why electricity is becoming one of the fastest-growing operating expenses

How AI data centers and rapid demand growth are driving grid costs higher

Why grid infrastructure costs are being socialized across all ratepayers

The limits of waiting for regulatory or political solutions

How behind-the-meter solar and battery storage reduce grid exposure

Peak shaving, demand charge management, and fixed-price power purchase agreements (PPAs)

Why predictable, fuel-free energy economics matter in a volatile grid environment

Rising electricity costs aren’t a short-term spike — they’re a structural shift. Organizations that recognize this early aren’t reacting with outrage; they’re deploying strategy. By generating power on-site and adding storage, businesses can lock in costs, reduce volatility, and regain control over their energy budgets.

Subscribe to The Clean Energy Edge for clear, real-world conversations about electricity prices, grid reliability, clean energy economics, and the solutions that actually work in today’s energy system.

Electricity costs are rising, demand is accelerating, and the grid is under more strain than at any point in modern history. In this January kickoff episode of The Clean Energy Edge, we shift from diagnosing the problem to explaining why clean energy still makes sense in 2026 and beyond.

December focused on what’s breaking in the electricity system — rising power prices, AI-driven demand growth, interconnection backlogs, transmission delays, and growing reliability risks. This episode zooms out to look at the bigger picture and explains why clean energy isn’t a fringe solution, but a practical response to how the grid actually works today.

This conversation isn’t about ideology or politics. It’s about math, timelines, and real-world constraints.

Sponsored by NXTGEN Clean Energy Solutions NXTGEN helps cities, schools, and companies design, finance, and execute real-world clean energy projects — from solar and battery storage to EV charging and resilient energy systems. Learn more at nxtgencleanenergy.com.

In this episode, we cover:

Why electricity demand is growing faster than supply can keep up

How AI data centers, electrification, and extreme weather are reshaping the grid

Why traditional solutions like fossil fuel and nuclear power don’t align with today’s timelines

How solar, battery storage, distributed generation, and microgrids deploy faster and scale where power is actually needed

Why modern grid reliability depends on flexibility, not baseload

How behind-the-meter clean energy reduces exposure to rising costs, fuel volatility, and grid bottlenecks

Utilities, businesses, and institutions are already turning to clean energy because it’s the fastest and most cost-effective way to respond to today’s grid realities. The real question isn’t whether clean energy can work — it’s whether slower, more expensive options can arrive in time to matter.

This episode sets the foundation for the January series, where each episode tackles a specific grid challenge and explains how clean energy solves it in practical, deployable ways.

Subscribe to The Clean Energy Edge for clear, no-spin conversations about electricity costs, grid reliability, clean energy economics, and the future of power.

After a recent episode on nuclear power sparked intense discussion, one issue became clear: many people are still confusing what works in theory with what can actually be delivered on real-world timelines.

In this episode of The Clean Energy Edge Podcast, Russ Bates steps back from ideology and focuses on execution. This isn’t a pro- or anti-nuclear argument — it’s a reality check on what the grid can finance, permit, build, and rely on in the 2020s.

This episode breaks down:

-Why nuclear scores well on physics but struggles on delivery

-The difference between theoretical reliability and real-world execution

-What recent projects like Vogtle tell us about cost and schedule risk

-Why electricity demand from data centers, electrification, and industry is a now problem, not a future one

-How asset lifespans, repowering, and modularity change the clean energy conversation

-Why “baseload” is not the same thing as modern grid reliability

-Where nuclear can fit — and where it doesn’t

The core message is simple: the grid doesn’t run on hypotheticals. It runs on resources that can be delivered in time to meet today’s demand.

If we don’t separate long-term possibilities from near-term realities, we risk delaying solutions that are already available — and the grid doesn’t have time for that.

👉 Subscribe to The Clean Energy Edge Podcast for clear, real-world discussions about grid reliability, timelines, and what actually works.

Clean energy isn’t failing — it’s being misunderstood.

In this solo episode of The Clean Energy Edge Podcast, Russ Bates explains why clean energy still feels unfamiliar and uncomfortable to so many people — even though the technology itself has been around for decades.

Drawing on his own background in traditional power generation, Russ walks through how clean energy challenges the century-old model of centralized, fuel-based electricity and replaces it with something fundamentally different: local control, price stability, resilience, and energy independence.

This episode covers:

Why clean energy feels “untraditional” — and why that’s intentional

The difference between clean energy technology and clean energy at scale

How solar, storage, and microgrids disrupt the traditional utility model

Why clean energy reduces exposure to fuel price volatility and outages

The myth that clean energy is expensive — and why costs are falling while grid prices rise

How misunderstanding clean energy leads to slower deployment, bad policy, and higher risk

Clean energy isn’t a silver bullet, and it doesn’t replace everything overnight. But it does solve real problems faster, cheaper, and closer to where electricity is actually used — if people are willing to understand it.

👉 Subscribe to The Clean Energy Edge Podcast for real-world discussions about the grid, energy costs, and how power is actually changing.

Even when new power plants are planned…

Even when projects are approved…

Even when electricity is actually being generated…

The grid often can’t deliver that power where it’s needed.

In this episode of The Clean Energy Edge Podcast, Russ Bates breaks down one of the most overlooked problems in the U.S. electricity system: the transmission bottleneck.

High-voltage transmission lines are the backbone of the grid, yet new lines can take 7–12 years to plan, permit, and build — far too slow for today’s rapidly growing demand. As electricity consumption accelerates due to AI data centers, electrification, extreme weather, and large energy-intensive facilities, transmission has become a major driver of rising prices and declining reliability.

This episode explains:

What transmission is and why it matters

Why electricity demand is growing faster than the grid can adapt

How congestion forces higher-cost power onto the system

Why transmission constraints raise electricity prices even when cheap power exists

How limited transmission weakens grid resilience during heat waves and cold snaps

Why “just building more power plants” doesn’t solve the real problem

Russ also explains why the traditional model of large, centralized power plants is running into hard limits — and why distributed energy, storage, and behind-the-meter generation are becoming essential to grid reliability going forward.

🎧 If electricity prices keep rising and the grid feels less reliable, transmission is a big reason why.

👉 Subscribe to The Clean Energy Edge Podcast for clear, real-world explanations of what’s broken in the energy system — and what actually works.

Electricity prices keep rising — but it’s not just about fuel costs or power plants. The real problem is something almost no one explains clearly: grid interconnection delays.

Across the U.S., thousands of gigawatts of fully developed power projects — including solar, battery storage, wind, fossil fuel, and even nuclear — are stuck waiting years just to get permission to connect to the grid. The power exists. The financing exists. The equipment exists. But the electricity can’t turn on.

In this episode of The Clean Energy Edge Podcast, we break down:

-What interconnection actually is and why it matters

-Why projects are waiting 3, 5, even 7 years in interconnection queues

-How outdated utility processes and risk-averse incentives slow everything down

-Why interconnection delays keep electricity supply artificially tight

-How congestion costs rise and ratepayers end up paying more

-Why this is not just a clean energy issue — fossil fuels, nuclear, and transmission upgrades are also affected

Utilities aren’t rewarded for speed. They’re rewarded for caution. And that broken incentive structure is quietly driving higher electricity prices, grid reliability risks, and emergency alerts, even when cheaper power is ready to go.

If you’ve ever heard someone say “just build more power plants”, this episode explains why that doesn’t solve the problem unless the grid itself changes.

👉 Next episode: We go upstream to the next bottleneck — transmission — and why even connected power often can’t get where it’s needed.

Nuclear power is often framed as the clean, reliable solution to America’s electricity crisis — but the reality is far more complicated.

In this episode of The Clean Energy Edge Podcast, Russ Bates breaks down why nuclear power struggles to address today’s grid challenges, focusing on the three issues that matter most right now: cost, schedule, and risk. Drawing on recent U.S. nuclear projects and real-world examples, the episode explains why nuclear plants take decades to deliver power, why costs routinely spiral into the tens of billions, and why high-consequence risks — from accidents to security threats — can’t be ignored

The conversation also takes a hard look at Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) — why they sound promising, but why they are not yet commercially viable or scalable for the 2020s.

This episode isn’t anti-nuclear — it’s about alignment. At a time when the grid needs fast, flexible, and affordable solutions, nuclear power simply doesn’t match the urgency of the moment.

In this episode, Russ — an IBEW electrician who spent decades inside fossil fuel power plants — explains why more gas and coal plants won’t solve America’s accelerating electricity crisis. After working on every part of these facilities, from coal yards to steam turbine generators to stack lights, he lays out exactly why fossil fuel generation cannot keep up with today’s demand curve.

Electricity demand is rising right now — driven by AI, data centers, electrification, and extreme weather — but fossil fuel plants take 5–10 years to build. And the turbine that actually produces electricity? It can take 5–7 years just to manufacture. Even if we approved a plant today, the equipment wouldn’t arrive until 2030 or 2031.

Russ breaks down why fossil generation loses on:

• Speed — far too slow for a 2027 supply–demand crisis

• Cost — billion-dollar gas plants vs. 12–36 month solar/storage builds

• Flexibility — fossil is built for baseload, not peaks

• Reliability — Texas 2021, California heat waves, and Midwest polar events all showed fossil plants failing first (frozen gas lines, coal piles, derates, turbine lockups)

He also explains what actually handles peak demand: solar, battery storage, behind-the-meter generation, demand response, and microgrids — technologies that scale in months, not decades.

The fastest-growing electricity demand in history requires the fastest-to-build supply in history — and fossil fuels simply can’t keep up.

Next episode: Nuclear — what’s real, what’s hype, and why the timelines are even longer. Hit subscribe so you don’t miss it.

Ohio is facing one of the fastest electricity demand surges in the Midwest — driven by data centers, manufacturing growth, electrification, and aging baseload generation. In this episode, Russ Bates sits down with Mryia Williams of Solar United Neighbors of Ohio to break down what this demand spike means for communities, what “community energy” actually is, and why local generation could play a critical role as Ohio heads toward projected shortfalls as early as 2027.

We unpack how renters, farmers, small businesses, schools, churches, and local governments can participate in smaller, faster-to-build energy projects that strengthen the grid, lower bills, and diversify local income. We also cover Ohio’s new House Bill 303, bipartisan support for community-scale projects, and the challenges posed by permitting, interconnection, and utility resistance to net metering.

With traditional power plants aging out, new generation taking years to build, and data center load increasing rapidly, Ohio is at a crossroads. Community energy—small, local, distribution-level solar and wind—may be one of the only near-term tools available to keep up with demand.

This is a must-watch episode for anyone in Ohio or the Midwest concerned about rising electricity costs, grid reliability, and the policies that will shape the state’s energy future.

Electricity prices are climbing, reliability is slipping, and utilities across the U.S. are warning about future shortages. But the reason behind it all is surprisingly simple: supply and demand are moving in opposite directions. In this episode, Russ breaks down why electricity is the most sensitive market in the economy — and why even small imbalances create higher prices, instability, and blackout risks.

We explain why supply is lagging:

• Retiring coal and gas plants without replacing them fast enough

• Fossil fuel plants taking years to build

• Nuclear taking decades

• Clean energy being the fastest option — but stuck behind slow permitting

• Interconnection queues jammed with thousands of gigawatts

• Transmission lines that take 7–12 years to complete Meanwhile, demand is exploding far faster than forecasts predicted:

• AI and data centers (fastest new load in U.S. history)

• Population growth

• Extreme heat and cold

• Electrification — EVs, heat pumps, building upgrades

Grid planners are sounding the alarm because this is now the fastest electricity demand growth in modern history, and supply simply isn’t keeping up. When demand outpaces supply — even briefly — the math guarantees higher prices and blackout risk.

Russ also previews upcoming episodes on:

• Why new fossil fuel plants and nuclear are too slow and too expensive to solve the crisis

• What clean energy solutions CAN scale fast enough

• What’s real — and what’s hype — in the nuclear debate

If you want to understand what’s really happening to U.S. electricity prices and the future of grid reliability, this episode breaks it down clearly. Subscribe to follow the full December “problem breakdown” series before we shift to January’s “solutions” episodes.