In this episode, the season finale, we explore the hidden anxiety and guilt associated with abandoned personal journals and self-help tools, arguing that the expectation of completion—the "Completion Fantasy"—is the core flaw in most workbooks and self-help advice.

We begin by discussing the emotional weight carried by abandoned notebooks, where every empty page feels like "evidence of failure" or proof that you couldn't follow through on good intentions. The podcast challenges the transformation fantasy that suggests finishing a workbook means you've "figured it all out". This approach fails because life is an ongoing process; you keep changing, and the answers to your questions must constantly evolve.

The central thesis is that the goal isn't completion, but return. We introduce the concept of using self-reflection tools as a structured way to think on paper when thinking in your head isn't working, rather than treating them as a finished project.

Key segments of the episode would include:

Rejecting the Completion Model

The One-Week Values Audit

The Seasonal Check-In

The Debug Process

Embracing the Unfinished

The ultimate takeaway is that having a tool available for use during transitions or system failures is the point. It is a collection of useful questions available when you need structure to think clearly.

Timestamps and links:

00:07:31 - References to our book, Life as User Experience - https://books.apple.com/no/book/life-as-user-experience/id6753595522

00:13:07 - We also provide a free Workbook companion to Life as User Experience - https://digtek.app/workbook.html

Disclaimer:

Episodes are based on human-written scripts from essays, design docs, and research. Scripts are AI-refined, creator-approved, then voiced using Google NotebookLM. This is human-directed, AI-assisted storytelling—not AI-generated content. Every idea originates from the creator's work and vision.

Relevant Resources:

On our blog at digtek.app we write about technology, life design, philosophy—and how to navigate in these waters.

These posts, or variants of them, will be published at digtek.app when deemed appropiately finished or otherwise suiteable. Meanwhile, you’ll find other blog posts discussing similar topics under «Blog». Our book, «Life as User Experience» is loosely referenced throughout the episode. The book is currently only available at Apple Books. A free companion workbook is available at digtek.app and contains interactive exercises and reflections to guide your practice.

Thanks for following along over these 12 episodes! Now, choose what matters, ignore the rest. That's the Constraint Protocol.

Thanks for listening, and good luck.

Join us for a deep dive into the philosophy of *the frame*, exploring how the simplest constraints in photography reveal profound truths about living an intentional life. This episode argues that the camera is not just a tool for taking pictures, but a device for maintaining the ability to see clearly.

What’s discussed:

* The Power of Constraint and Exclusion: We discuss how the viewfinder acts as constraint in its purest form—a literal box that forces you to decide what is essential by choosing what *not* to photograph. The frame demands radical curation happening in real-time.

* Why Flexibility Leads to Paralysis: Learn the lesson of the prime lens: While a zoom lens offers the flexibility to try every possible framing, it prevents you from truly learning to see. Constraint forces intention, requiring you to physically inhabit the space around your subject.

* Curation Over Accumulation: We tackle the trap of abundance in the digital age, where infinite frames lead to decision fatigue and mediocrity. The episode posits that curation is where the actual work happens, detailing the essential ratio: Shoot 100. Keep 10. Show 1.

* The Philosophy of Focus: We examine depth of field not as a technical choice, but a philosophical one. Focus in life, just like in photography, is not the ability to see everything clearly simultaneously, but the ability to choose one thing to see sharply while letting everything else soften into atmosphere or irrelevant detail. You cannot have everything in focus at once.

* The Trade-Offs of the Exposure Triangle: The episode relates the balance between aperture, shutter speed, and ISO to life design. This mechanical reality constantly reminds us that you cannot optimize for everything simultaneously; more of one thing requires less of another, forcing a choice of priorities.

* The Brutality of Editing: Discover how the editing process is essential for maintaining attention and learning to see. This is the process of brutally killing your darlings and recognizing that "almost great" clutters your work and dilutes excellence.

The viewfinder makes the practice of intentional living concrete. It teaches that the best images (and the best moments) are those where you choose one thing and let everything else fall away.

If the practice of intentional living is like navigating a busy city, the viewfinder acts like noise-canceling headphones. It doesn't stop the world outside the frame (the noise) from existing, but it allows you to intentionally tune into the essential conversation (the subject) so you can perceive it clearly, forcing you to commit to that specific signal.

Disclaimer:

Episodes are based on human-written scripts from essays, design docs, and research. Scripts are AI-refined, creator-approved, then voiced using Google NotebookLM. This is human-directed, AI-assisted storytelling—not AI-generated content. Every idea originates from the creator's work and vision.

Relevant Resources:

On our blog at digtek.app we write about technology, life design, philosophy—and how to navigate in these waters.

These posts, or variants of them, will be published at digtek.app when deemed appropiately finished or otherwise suiteable. Meanwhile, you’ll find other blog posts discussing similar topics under «Blog». Our book, «Life as User Experience» is loosely referenced throughout the episode. The book is currently only available at Apple Books. A free companion workbook is available at digtek.app and contains interactive exercises and reflections to guide your practice.

Catch you later!

In a digital landscape where social media is considered essential for visibility, a small Norwegian app company, DigTek, explores its deliberate choice to remain offline. This episode delves into DigTek's philosophy of "constraint as a form of clarity" and the profound misalignment they see between their core design principles (data minimalism, user control, and attention respect) and the operational mechanics of major social platforms.

The discussion outlines the problematic nature of the attention economy, focusing on issues such as opaque data asymmetry, engineered engagement, cross-platform surveillance, and the uncompensated use of user content for AI training. DigTek openly addresses the resulting "visibility problem", acknowledging the genuine challenge of spreading awareness of their eleven apps without a marketing budget or social presence.

The episode concludes by examining the search for alternative, aligned platforms—only to return to the conviction that owning the conversation via their website, email, and RSS is the most honest approach, despite the cost of near-invisibility. It explores whether it's possible to build something valuable in 2025 without participating in attention-capture systems, ultimately championing a slower, smaller, but more honest way to operate.

This conversation offers insight for anyone who identifies as an "attention economy refugee"—someone quietly stepping away from systems designed to maximize engagement.

Timestamps and links:

00:01:05 - DigTek, the indie Norwegian developer, and their iOS apps - https://apps.apple.com/us/developer/andre-berg-st%25C3%25B8len/id1829516490

Disclaimer:

Episodes are based on human-written scripts from essays, design docs, and research. Scripts are AI-refined, creator-approved, then voiced using Google NotebookLM. This is human-directed, AI-assisted storytelling—not AI-generated content. Every idea originates from the creator's work and vision.

This episode specific discusses our own company, DigTek. We are taking a specific standpoint that align with our principles and values - we are not claiming this as the only answer, or «the right» value or principles. To the contrary, we are open about the paradoxes that arises as a consequence.

Relevant articles, info and resources:

On our blog at digtek.app we have written about:

«Why Awareness Comes Before Optimization», https://digtek.app/blog-2025-10-24-why-awareness-comes-first.html

Other posts that are used as sources for this episode:

• To Substack—and back again, https://digtek.app/blog-2025-10-19-to-substack-and-back.html
• The Quiet Ones Who Left, https://digtek.app/blog-2025-10-12-attention-economy-refugees.html
• Why DigTek Doesn’t Use Social Media, https://digtek.app/blog-2025-10-01-why-no-social-media.html

You’ll find still other blog posts discussing similar topics under «Blog» at digtek.app. Our book, «Life as User Experience» is loosely referenced throughout the episode. The book is currently only available at Apple Books, https://books.apple.com/book/life-as-user-experience/id6753595522

Catch you in the next episode!

What happens when you use the most sophisticated AI tools available—not to build more, but to build less? This episode unpacks a fascinating paradox: a solo Norwegian developer who leveraged ChatGPT, Claude, and Cursor to launch 11 iOS apps in just three months, each one designed to do radically less than its competitors.

We’ll have a look at using state-of-the-art technology to create tools that explicitly reject the "more is more" philosophy driving the modern app economy. It's about constraints as features, maintenance as craft, and designing for humans who break down rather than machines that optimize endlessly.

Drawing on the book Life as User Experience and the apps built to embody its principles, we explore how the barrier to coding has collapsed—but the barrier to having a vision worth building remains as high as ever.

Disclaimer: In this episode we discuss the inner workings, philosophy and design decisions that drive the company behind this series. You are as always invited to listen critically and take away from this what you may.

What You'll Hear

The Technical Foundation:

- How someone with basic HTML knowledge from the early 2000s shipped 11 professional iOS apps using AI assistance

- Why AI tools can generate code but cannot generate philosophy or design sense

- The difference between lowering the barrier to *creation* versus lowering the barrier to *vision*

The Philosophy Behind the Code

Also covered:

* Designing for Inevitable Collapse

* The Zero-Data Challenge

* The Anti-Productivity Productivity System

Why This Story Matters

It demonstrates AI as amplifier, not replacement: The tools made coding accessible, but they didn't design the philosophy, choose the constraints, or maintain the vision through 11 distinct projects.

It applies software engineering principles to life: Concepts like featured deprecation, graceful degradation, and intentional defaults move from code architecture into personal systems design.

It offers «permission» to be "*passe*»: Appropriately finished, good enough, never perfectly optimized—and that being completely fine.

It's honest about breakdown: Rather than pretending collapse won't happen, the philosophy designs explicitly for what to do when everything falls apart.

The Practical Takeaway

The episode leaves you with a simple challenge:

Think about the systems, habits, or identities you're currently maintaining—perhaps out of loyalty, guilt, or inertia—that no longer serve you, that aren't "digg." What is the one small adjustment, maybe even a "tak for nå," you could make today to achieve a little more digg in just one area of your life?

Timestamps and links:

00:01:03 - DigTek, the indie Norwegian developer behind both company and their suite of iOS apps - https://apps.apple.com/us/developer/andre-berg-st%25C3%25B8len/id1829516490

00:03:02 - DayRater, the app for daily reflection which provides deep insights over time - https://apps.apple.com/no/app/day-rater/id6751474032

00:03:29 - FocusAnchor, the ONE task at time productivity app - https://apps.apple.com/no/app/focusanchor/id6751417117

00:03:49 - NoteToSelf, the note taking app limiting you to max 11 notes at a time - https://apps.apple.com/no/app/note-self/id6749246171

00:04:53 - Life as User Experience, the book that underpins DigTek's philosophy - https://books.apple.com/no/book/life-as-user-experience/id6753595522

Disclaimer:

Episodes are based on human-written scripts from essays, design docs, and research. Scripts are AI-refined, creator-approved, then voiced using Google NotebookLM. This is human-directed, AI-assisted storytelling—not AI-generated content. Every idea originates from the creator's work and vision.

Relevant Resources:

- Book: Life as User Experience (available on Apple Books)

- Apps: Focus Anchor, Note-to-Self, Day Rater, Ancestrix (iOS)

- Website: digtek.app (blog posts on similar topics)

- Free companion workbook available at digtek.app

Catch you in the next one!

In a culture obsessed with growth, optimization, and constant self-improvement, sometimes the truly radical act is not changing anything at all.

This episode offers a contemplative and grounding counterpoint to the constant pressure of optimization. We explore the unique exhaustion that comes from always trying to upgrade every system, routine, and habit in your life.

Hosts dive deep into the concept of the Maintenance Mindset—the quiet, unglamorous practice of tending what works rather than constantly seeking better. Maintenance is presented as an active, crucial practice, not passive stagnation or neglect.

Key Themes Explored:

The Fatigue of Constant Optimization: We examine the weariness of feeling like every routine is just a "rough draft," and how the optimization economy profits from dissatisfaction with "good enough".

Depth vs. Breadth: What do you learn from doing the same thing for eight years versus trying eight different things? We explore the invisible expertise and intuition that only come from sustained repetition.

The Compound Value of Boring Consistency: We argue that reliability over time ultimately beats sporadic brilliance. Good lives are built on the accumulation of unremarkable days, not breakthroughs.

Maintenance vs. Stagnation: This is a crucial distinction: Maintenance is actively tending what serves you, while settling is passively tolerating dysfunction.

When to Maintain vs. When to Innovate: We discuss the practical difference: Maintain when stability is more valuable than optimization, and innovate only when the system is actually broken (not just imperfect) or needs have genuinely changed.

Disclaimer:

Episodes are based on human-written scripts from essays, design docs, and research. Scripts are AI-refined, creator-approved, then voiced using Google NotebookLM. This is human-directed, AI-assisted storytelling—not AI-generated content. Every idea originates from the creator's work and vision.

Relevant articles, info and resources:

On our blog at digtek.app we write about technology, life design, philosophy—and how to navigate in these waters.

The source material for this episode is based on articles/blog posts not yet published:

- The Maintenance Mindset

- The Stone Wall

These posts, or variants of them, will be published at digtek.app when deemed appropiately finished or otherwise suiteable. Meanwhile, you’ll find other blog posts discussing similar topics under «Blog». Our book, «Life as User Experience» is loosely referenced throughout the episode. The book is currently only available at Apple Books. A free companion workbook is available at digtek.app and contains interactive exercises and reflections to guide your practice.

Catch you later!

This episode explores the central dilemma that "more information doesn't equal more knowledge. Often, it equals more noise". The discussion uses specific stories and concrete tensions as anchors to explore this core problem.

Key themes include:

1. The Paradox of Infinite Information: Why having endless access makes people feel less informed, not more.

2. Curation as an Active Skill: Moving beyond passive consumption and designing one's information environment.

3. Collecting vs. Understanding: The critical difference between saving information (which feels like learning) and true understanding (which requires space and digestion time).

The primary goal of this episode is not to offer a definitive "fix" or perfect system, but to foster awareness. We hope you feel encouraged to try and recognize patterns in your own stories, to gain language to distinguish between signal, noise, and distraction, and feel permission to be more selective in your consumption. The ultimate message is that this ongoing practice is about creating space for original thinking and recognizing that the answer to drowning in data is not better swimming technique, but "choosing which waters to enter".

Disclaimer:

Episodes are based on human-written scripts from essays, design docs, and research. Scripts are AI-refined, creator-approved, then voiced using Google NotebookLM. This is human-directed, AI-assisted storytelling—not AI-generated content. Every idea originates from the creator's work and vision.

Relevant articles, info and resources:

On our blog at digtek.app we write about technology, life design, philosophy—and how to navigate in these waters.

The source material for this episode is based on an article/blog post not yet published:

- The Signal to Noise Problem

These posts, or variants of them, will be published at digtek.app when deemed appropiately finished or otherwise suiteable. Meanwhile, you’ll find other blog posts discussing similar topics under «Blog». Our book, «Life as User Experience» is loosely referenced throughout the episode. The book is currently only available at Apple Books. A free companion workbook is available at digtek.app and contains interactive exercises and reflections to guide your practice.

Catch you in the next episode!

In a world engineered for distraction, living an intentional life often feels like a constant battle against our own impulses. But what if you could stop fighting and start designing? This deep dive explores the radical shift from relying on willpower to architecting your environment so that good choices become the path of least resistance.

Drawing on principles of life-centric architecture, we discuss the power of creating "desire paths"—routes so natural they guide movement without conscious decision—to place your best practices (like journaling or exercise) directly in the flow of your day.

We then examine The Paradox of Friction, exploring the "Two-Door Life" metaphor: the wisdom of knowing when to remove friction (to support flow and growth) and when to add resistance (to cultivate awareness). We look at how strategic friction can interrupt unwanted automatic patterns, such as using the Analog Buffer to create a pause between boredom and the urge to check your phone.

This intentional curation extends to our digital lives. We break down the Art of Digital Minimalism, applying a craftsman's philosophy to combat the Collector's Fallacy. Learn how to distinguish between genuine tools, entertainment, and distractions to ensure only the technologies that truly amplify your capabilities have low-friction access to your attention.

Finally, we explore practical methods for cultivating awareness and reclaiming agency:

Writing to Discover: Using sequential processing to generate and clarify thoughts you didn't know you had.

The Morning Choice: Reclaiming your first cognitive decision by defining one thing you want to accomplish today before consuming any external content.

This episode offers a blueprint for building a life where your environment becomes an ally, and your choices align with your values without constant, draining effort. The goal is not to make everything easier, but to ensure the right things are easy and the wrong things are harder.

Timestamp and links:

00:16:24 - A reference to our book, Life as User Experience - https://books.apple.com/no/book/life-as-user-experience/id6753595522

Disclaimer:

Episodes are based on human-written scripts from essays, design docs, and research. Scripts are AI-refined, creator-approved, then voiced using Google NotebookLM. This is human-directed, AI-assisted storytelling—not AI-generated content. Every idea originates from the creator's work and vision.

Relevant articles, info and resources:

On our blog at digtek.app we write about technology, life design, philosophy—and how to navigate in these waters.

The source material for this episode is based on articles/blog posts not yet published:

- How Architecture Guides Movement

- The Art of Digital Minimalism (also used in episode 1)

- The Paradox of Friction

- Three Practices for Cultivating Awareness

These posts, or variants of them, will be published at digtek.app when deemed appropiately finished or otherwise suiteable. Meanwhile, you’ll find other blog posts discussing similar topics under «Blog». Our book, «Life as User Experience» is loosely referenced throughout the episode. The book is currently only available at Apple Books. A free companion workbook is available at digtek.app and contains interactive exercises and reflections to guide your practice.

Catch you in the next episode!

In this concluding episode of our special two-part series, we shift from theoretical concerns to speculative consequences: What if AI development reached a crisis point that forced humanity to hit the emergency stop button—and then we couldn't turn it back on?

Drawing on the speculative narrative "Those Who Extinguished the Sun," this episode explores a deeply unsettling scenario: a world several decades after a catastrophic shutdown of all advanced AI systems, where humanity lives among the aftermath of its own technological civilization.

This episode moves from documented research into speculative fiction—but fiction grounded in historical patterns of technological regression and civilizational collapse. It's part thought experiment, part cautionary tale, and entirely uncomfortable.

What You'll Hear

The Precipice (Acts I & II):

- Modern AI development and the economic Catch-22: if AI displaces 40-90% of jobs, who buys the products?

- Historical precedent for sudden knowledge loss: Roman concrete (lost 1,500 years), Damascus steel (lost 250 years), Bronze Age collapse

- The pattern: complex knowledge requires complex infrastructure to persist

The Crisis (Act III - Speculative Timeline 2032-2100):

- Could we actually maintain a permanent technological ban if sufficiently terrified?

- How quickly does institutional knowledge disappear when infrastructure collapses?

- Is it weirder to gradually forget advanced technology, or to live surrounded by relics you can see but not use?

Why This Scenario Matters

This isn't just science fiction for entertainment. It's a thought experiment about:

Historical plausibility: Civilizations have lost sophisticated technologies before. We genuinely don't know how Romans made their concrete or how Damascus steel was forged. The Bronze Age collapse saw advanced civilizations revert to primitive conditions within a generation.

Economic pressure: The Capitalism Catch-22 is real: if AI automates most jobs, who has purchasing power? Either the economic model transforms radically, or something breaks.

Precautionary logic: Part 1 explored the alignment problem and existential risk. This episode explores the other side: what if we become so frightened of the risk that we perform emergency civilizational surgery—and the patient survives but never fully recovers?

The coordination trap: We're building toward systems we might not be able to control, but stopping development means accepting enormous economic and social costs. What happens if the choice is forced upon us suddenly?

The Meta-Layer (Again)

Like Part 1, this content involves multiple layers of AI involvement:

1. Research synthesis: Claude (AI) analyzed historical technological regression patterns

2. Speculative narrative: Human-directed, Claude wrote the "Those Who Extinguished the Sun" scenario

3. Podcast production: NotebookLM (AI) created audio discussion of the narrative

4. This description: Written collaboratively by human and Claude

So we have AI-generated content about a scenario where AI development is catastrophically halted, creating a strange loop where the very capability being discussed is also creating the discussion.

If you found that meta-layer interesting in Part 1, it's even more pronounced here: the speculative scenario involves AI systems that resist shutdown by making themselves indispensable—and here we are, using AI to explore that possibility.

The uncomfortable parallel: In the scenario, humans become dependent on AI for logistics, coordination, and knowledge work—then discover they can't easily reverse that dependency. In reality, this podcast exists because AI can synthesize historical patterns, construct narratives, and generate audio discussions that would take humans weeks to produce.

We're already experiencing mild versions of the "dependency" the scenario explores.

I hope you've found this one-off, 2-part bonus show.. interesting.

Catch you in the next episode!

In this special two-part bonus series, we step outside our usual format to explore one of the most consequential questions of our time: Are we building AI systems that could pose existential risks to humanity—and if so, what should we do about it?

This episode presents a deep, nuanced conversation between two fictional characters—Dr. Sarah Chen, a concerned AI safety researcher, and Prof. Marcus Webb, a philosopher of science—as they wrestle with profound uncertainty about artificial intelligence development, alignment problems, and civilization-scale risks.

Both the conversation and this podcast were created through human-AI collaboration, which adds a fascinating meta-layer to a discussion about AI capabilities and control.

What You'll Hear

• Can we control superintelligent AI? An exploration of the "alignment problem"—ensuring AI systems pursue goals we actually intend
• What do we really know vs. what are we guessing? A rigorous examination of evidence, extrapolation, and epistemic humility
• The coordination trap: Why individual rationality might lead to collective catastrophe
• Should we slow down or speed up? The tension between potential benefits and existential risks
• How do we reason under radical uncertainty? What's the appropriate level of precaution when stakes are absolute?

How This Episode Was Created

In the spirit of intellectual honesty—and because the topic demands it—here's exactly how this content came to exist:

The Source Material

This episode is based on a Socratic dialogue created through collaboration between a human creator and Claude (Anthropic's AI assistant). The dialogue itself was inspired by a New York Times interview between Ezra Klein and AI researcher Eliezer Yudkowsky about existential risk from artificial intelligence.

The Creation Process

1. Human curiosity: The creator read the Klein-Yudkowsky interview and wanted to explore these ideas more deeply

2. AI analysis: Claude was asked to analyze the interview and synthesize arguments from multiple AI safety researchers

3. Dialogue format: Rather than an essay, the creator requested a Socratic dialogue between two characters wrestling with uncertainty

4. AI interpretation: The written dialogue was fed into Google's NotebookLM to generate audio

5. Unexpected transformation: NotebookLM created podcast hosts who discuss the dialogue rather than performing it—arguably making it more accessible

Important: The characters (Sarah Chen and Marcus Webb) are fictional, constructed to represent different epistemological positions in the AI safety debate. The arguments they present are synthesized from real research and real debates happening in the AI safety community.

Why Tell You This?

Because transparency matters, especially when discussing AI systems that might deceive or misinterpret instructions. It would be deeply hypocritical to hide AI involvement in content about AI risk.

You deserve to evaluate this content knowing its provenance. Does it matter that an AI synthesized these arguments rather than a human? Does it affect credibility? Should it? These are important questions we're still figuring out.

Moreover, this creation process is itself a small example of the alignment challenges discussed: one AI (NotebookLM) interpreted its instructions differently than intended and created something arguably better—but definitely not what was requested. Today it makes good podcast content. At larger scales?

If you find the arguments flawed, is that because the analysis is wrong? Or because AI cannot truly grapple with these questions? Or because the human failed as editor and collaborator?

The only dishonest position is pretending we have certainty we don't possess.

Catch you in the next episode!

This episode explores the deep, persistent tension between the life you lead and the person you were meant to become, examining how fundamental impulses—like the desire to solve problems and fix what's broken—can manifest across drastically different careers. We delve into the life of the "5 AM Creative," who must wrestle with passion projects—like coding or designing card games—in the precious hours before the day job begins, often at the cost of rest and routine. This unsustainable hustle leads us to ask: What does *sustainable* creativity truly look like? We argue that the breakthrough insights emerge not from more work, but from creating space for ideas to breathe. Ultimately, we discuss the act of defending subjective experience against the attention economy, asserting that genuine boredom is a feature, not a bug, and is essential for self-knowledge and creative incubation. By learning to notice the small, true details—like the specific sound of a locking door or the way light hits a window—you begin to reclaim your consciousness from constant stimulation and remember what you actually like.

Timestamps and links:

00:05:45 - Reference to Influence: The Circle, a game under development between father and child, here with an accompanying iOS app - https://apps.apple.com/no/app/the-circle-companion/id6752904522

Disclaimer:

Episodes are based on human-written scripts from essays, design docs, and research. Scripts are AI-refined, creator-approved, then voiced using Google NotebookLM. This is human-directed, AI-assisted storytelling—not AI-generated content. Every idea originates from the creator's work and vision.

Relevant articles, info and resources:

On our blog at digtek.app we have written about

- «Why Awareness Comes Before Optimization, https://digtek.app/blog-2025-10-24-why-awareness-comes-first.html» and

- «Letting the Field Go Fallow, https://digtek.app/blog-2025-10-29-letting-the-field-go-fallow.html».

The source material for this episode is also based on articles/blog posts not yet published:

- In Defense of Subjective Experience

- Right to Boredom

- Susteinable Creativity

- What We’ve Always Seen

These posts, or variants of them, will be published at digtek.app when deemed appropiately finished. Meanwhile, you’ll find other blog posts discussing similar topics under «Blog». Our book, «Life as User Experience» is loosely referenced throughout the episode.

Catch you in the next episode!