James Corbett appears in two separate interviews for KLA.TV. In the first, he discusses how the US/Israeli relationship explains Uncle Sam's moves in the Middle East and how technocracy explains the so-called "Donroe Doctrine." In the second, he goes in-depth on the Epstein files and what they reveal about the operations of the kakistocracy.
Skip to Interview One / Interview Two
FIRST INTERVIEW
Description via KLA.TV: Which greater goal is being achieved with President Maduro's arrest and the US economic warfare against Cuba? What is the agenda behind the aggression against Iran and Palestine? Investigative Researcher James Corbett answers these and more questions in this brand new Kla.TV short interview.
VIDEO COURTESY: KLA.TV
TRANSCRIPT COURTESY OF KLA.TV:
Interviewer:
So great to have James Corbett back on KLA TV. James, thank you so much for agreeing to yet another interview.
James Corbett:
Thank you for having me on
Interviewer:
I would like James Corbett's take on America's strange behavior vis-a-vis Iran, Greenland, Venezuela, Cuba, and Palestine. Now, I know that's a lot, we could do two hours. But I wonder if you want to put all of this in a nice nutshell, encapsulating the insane...well, let's just say encapsulating the U.S. stance. Or do you want to take these one by one?
James Corbett:
Let's take them in two groups. I would say that Iran and Palestine and what is happening there definitely have a relation. And the common factor in the U.S. stance in both of those situations is, of course, Israel.
And I think Israel's desire to undermine Iran as a potential regional rival fully explains why the U.S. has the stance that it does against Iran. Does anyone—anyone in the entire world—believe at this point that the U.S. government is involved in trying to destabilize the Iranian regime because they care about the Iranian people and they want to see democracy flourish and blah, blah?
Of course not. We are old enough to understand that that is absolute nonsense and tosh.
So, what is the real answer there? Well, I think it has more to do with the Zionist faction that is looking to create the "Greater Israel" and recognizing that Iran would be a bulwark against the creation of such a thing. And obviously with Hezbollah and other such things operating against Israel and of course [Hamas] in Palestine as well.
And to whatever extent that Trump may or may not actually be the "wheeler-dealer businessman" that we understand his public persona to be and that maybe he really is just trying to get "Trump Gaza" going with these casinos on the beach and whatever else is supposedly going to happen in those AI monstrosity fantasies that are being constructed by Trump's fans online—to whatever extent that that might be a thought in his head it is only there because, of course, he is really working with his friend, his partner in crime, literally, unconvicted war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu.
So, I think that that explains that side of the geopolitical aisle.
But when we talk about the "Donroe Doctrine" and its various implications for Venezuela and Cuba and Greenland and other things in the Western Hemisphere, I think we have to understand this in the context of an interesting map that one could find at the Cornell Library. It has it online in very high res if you want to go download it.
It's called the "Technate of America," and it was a map that was produced in 1940 by Howard Scott, who was a complete charlatan who somehow or other managed to worm his way into academic and upper-crust circles in the 1920s and 30s in order to create something called "Technocracy, Inc.," which was an organization that was dedicated to the social engineering of society by technocrats—mostly engineers and scientists who would know how to precisely balance the inputs and outputs in the economy in order to stop the big swings in the economy that was, of course, the defining characteristic of life for people living through the Great Depression. [People were] wondering "how are—you know, capitalism has failed—how are we going to solve this?" Well, there was Howard Scott and his friend, King Hubbert, who people will know as [the progenitor of] "Hubbert's Peak," aka "peak oil," [which] comes from a Shell Oil researcher along those lines of oil, et cetera.
Anyway, he came up with the peak oil [idea]. He also wrote the Technocracy Study Course, which is this voluminous study course about how the technocrats will rule over their technate.
And so they said, "we don't want governments. We don't want elected politicians. We don't want any of that. We are going to set up a technate!" And the "Technate of America" will include—and there is the map that you can go and look up online—and it includes Greenland.
And interestingly, it includes part of Venezuela, and it includes Cuba, and it includes Panama, and Central America, et cetera. And all of this will be conjoined in a single unit called the Technate of America that will be stewarded over by these technocrats.
Now, obviously, Technocracy, Inc. is long [gone]—well, actually it still exists, but it is a rump organization at this point. But the idea of technocracy continues to thrive in the 21st century.
And, you know, there are some interesting historical parallels with some of the people who make their presence known on the international stage, even to this day, like say Elon Musk, who people may or may not know, his grandfather, his Canadian grandfather, was literally a card-carrying member of Technocracy, Inc. in Saskatchewan back in the 1930s before he was run out of Canada and ended up in South Africa, where the Musk family originates from. His grandfather, Joshua Haldeman. Look that up and fact-check me.
Interviewer:
Okay.
James Corbett:
But it is true. His grandfather was a literal technocrat. And then you get Elon Musk tweeting such things as, you know, "preparing for the Martian technocracy," et cetera. So I think technocracy is the lens through which we have to understand this unfolding Donroe Doctrine.
What is really going to unfold from this is the consolidation of the Western hemisphere into this Technate of America.
Interviewer:
Now, this consolidation, I mean, it's it's just too fantastic to imagine that it's going to happen in the very near future as an invasion of these countries. I mean, you can't foresee boots on the ground in Greenland, Venezuela are Cuba, can you?
James Corbett:
No, well, no, I will qualify that. But for example with Greenland. So we saw this play out, obviously, over the course of the past month.
Interviewer:
Yeah.
James Corbett:
Suddenly [at] the World Economic Forum, the main topic of discussion is: will Trump invade Greenland? And you have NATO talking about stationing troops there and Canada was going to come to Greenland's defense, all of this craziness.
Interviewer:
Yeah.
James Corbett:
And then what eventuated is Trump announced, "well, we're not going to take it by force." And so it seemed like just another "Art of the Deal." Trump obviously getting people to talk and think along one line and then retreating so that it seems like we can cut a deal.
But all of that, of course, was distraction, because, in fact, the U.S. already has a military base operating and functioning in Greenland right now. It has had a longstanding post-World War II relationship with Denmark to situate American forces on Greenland. They have been operating there for over half a century at this point, 80 years or so.
So, the idea that there would ever need to be a full-on American invasion in order to make these things happen does seem fanciful. But perhaps that's the point. No, the military side of this is not the operative part of it.
It is to some extent about securing resources, including of course the rare earth deposits and other such things that obviously Greenland has in abundance and that are sitting out there for the taking in this new mad scramble for the Arctic that's going on geopolitically. But, more specifically, the securing of the resources for the Technate of America—as in, for this coming political consolidation unit that is coming into view right now.
And I think we've been being prepared for the consolidation of these grander geopolitical regional units for some time now, because we've been seeing the "NATO versus BRICS" sort of idea of some sort of "multipolar struggle" taking place on the grand chessboard of geopolitics for some time. And I think we've been being prepared for the idea that it's going to be some sort of consolidation of a North American/Western hemispheric continental regional security apparatus of some sort.
Will it be literally a government that will consolidate all of these with boots on the ground? I don't think that is the most likely way of doing it. But some sort of consolidation politically, economically, and in terms of supply lines and supply chains, which is probably the operative part of this going forward into the 21st century.
Interviewer:
I want to preface this question with a pre-question, and that is this. Consider the two wars in Iraq and the interim when President Clinton was in power in the United States and we still had an economic embargo on Iraq. We still had a no-fly zone. I think we still might have been bombing them. Certainly, we were blocking off many kinds of supplies, including, as far as my research, or as far as I know, medicine and food.
So, could you consider that that interim period was also simply a continuation of the war and the war actually did not end?
James Corbett:
Absolutely, yes. No, of course, the war just took a different form. And it was, of course, concentrated on, at that time, the civilian population. And that was actually known and deliberate.
Because, of course,
