Longtime referee and judge Rob Hinds returns to clear up misconceptions about judging a fight, weigh in on open scoring, and offer a surprising reaction to unflattering results from The Athletic’s fighter survey.

Amanda Nunes thoroughly dominated featherweight title challenger Felicia Spencer on a night where the judges were on point. But did their scores reflect the degree of domination from the Lioness? Scott and Dan discuss.

With Amanda Nunes set to defend her featherweight title at UFC 250, Scott and Dan rescore the Lioness’ 2017 rematch against Valentina Shevchenko, which was about as close as it gets.

Gilbert Burns crushed Tyron Woodley for five rounds on a night marked by fun finishes and impeccable judging at the UFC’s first non-Contender Series event at its state-of-the-art facility.

Tyron Woodley returns to the octagon Saturday for the first time since Kamaru Usman took his title in dominant fashion. How dominant was it? Scott and Dan apply their scoring system to see.

Khabib Nurmagomedov and Demetrious Johnson are modern MMA greats, but both reached the peak thanks to some debatable decision wins early in their UFC careers. Scott and Dan spotlight those fights in Past Judgment.

Longtime MMA referee and judge Rob Hinds joins Scott and Dan to assess close fights from the three UFC events in Jacksonville, as well as clear up some judging misconceptions.

Robbery in Jacksonville?! Sure, Dan and Scott saw much of the action differently than the judges, but many fights were closer than some think. The Couchside Judges dissect the decisions.

Scott’s fuming about the extra punishment Anthony Smith endured at the hands of Glover Teixiera, and Dan vents about the lack of 10-7 scores given by judges in MMA.

A terrific pay-per-view event heralded the return of live sports, with Justin Gaethje and Henry Cejudo the big winners. Scott and Dan break down how even the judging in Jacksonville was on point.